No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infor LN vs Infor VISUAL comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infor LN
Ranking in ERP
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Infor VISUAL
Ranking in ERP
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LN is 2.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infor VISUAL is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ERP Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infor LN2.5%
Infor VISUAL1.3%
Other96.2%
ERP
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2123580 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infor Ln Manufacturing Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Cloud deployment has streamlined complex manufacturing projects and supports faster implementations
The workflow configuration, alert configuration, and report designing could be a bit easier. It is easy now, but it needs some technical guidance in terms of writing code, fixing it, and making it more flexible for users. The improvement needed in this area is around twenty percent. Seventy to eighty percent is user-friendly, but if Infor can put more energies into making this easier, that would be beneficial. Extensions and any customizations are also a bit technical. If they can make it a simple drag and drop, low code or no code method, it would be easier. Another area for improvement is AI integration. As we are in the AI era, Infor is putting energies into integrating AI within the application, but they are still in progress. If AI can be integrated so that customers or users can interact with it, that would be beneficial. If users want any information from the system or application, it should be a chat-based, user-friendly interaction so that they can get insights in real time. AI integration would add an advantage on a greater level, and Infor should focus on this improvement area.
Carlos  Cardona - PeerSpot reviewer
Operations Manager at Visual K
Powerful accounting functionality, easy to implement, and same day support response
There is a tool in Infor VISUAL that is called Costing Utilities, they should make the functionality more flexible. In a future release, if they could add a CRM incorporated into the core of the solution that would be awesome. Additionally, a more flexible project model. They have a project model, but it's very challenging to set up values.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"The best feature of this solution, is that it provides businesses with a way to see information from across different process streams, in one place via dashboards."
"Infor LN is compatible with our company size and is cost-effective compared to other ERP solutions like SAP."
"The best thing about Infor LN is that you can use it for inter-company business and for international businesses, especially by mid-sized and big companies."
"Infor LN is a completely integrated product that provides good stability."
"We like the recent customization features that Infor is providing, such as extensibility, which do not impact on version upgrades."
"Infor LN is highly stable."
"The most valuable features of Infor VISUAL are its powerful accounting, multicurrency functionality, and production aspects."
"The most valuable features of Infor VISUAL are its powerful accounting, multicurrency functionality, and production aspects. We implement the manufacturing for many customers. These are the main goals of the solution."
 

Cons

"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"The price is challenging in the market."
"The solution’s performance could be improved."
"My rating considers user experience, missing advanced scheduling and sequential product configurator."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"There is a tool in Infor VISUAL that is called Costing Utilities, they should make the functionality more flexible."
"There is a tool in Infor VISUAL that is called Costing Utilities, they should make the functionality more flexible."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have to pay a licensing fee for the solution."
"The standard pricing is two thousand per year per user. There are no additional costs."
"The cost is somewhat high."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"Infor LN is a free solution, and everything is included in the package, such as add-ons."
"The price of the solution can vary."
"I would say that Infor's pricing is competitive compared to other ERP solutions available in the market, such as SAP and Oracle."
"The tool’s AMC and support are given on a yearly basis. You need to make monthly payments for support."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
894,830 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Construction Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LN?
Infor LN is cost-effective when compared to solutions like SAP.
What needs improvement with Infor LN?
The workflow configuration, alert configuration, and report designing could be a bit easier. It is easy now, but it needs some technical guidance in terms of writing code, fixing it, and making it ...
What is your primary use case for Infor LN?
I am a user of Infor and occasionally use Salesforce as well. I have been using Infor for close to a decade. I am a consultant, specifically an implementation consultant where I implement Infor LN....
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Infor ERP LN
Infor Visual Enterprise
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LTH Castings, Gloucester Engineering, Gorman-Rupp, Computer Designs, Instrument Technology, GWA Group Limited, PRIDE Industries, CAV Aerospace, New Scale Technologies Inc.
Skills Inc, Darmex, Eberhard Manufacturing, Bluegame, ENERTECH fabricaciones, L&H Industrial, Geophysical Survey Systems, Computer Designs, Essen, Graphicast, Instrument Technology, J&E Manufacturing
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: May 2026.
894,830 professionals have used our research since 2012.