IFS Cloud Platform vs KACE Asset Management Appliance comparison

IFS and Quest Software are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. IFS is ranked #15 with an average rating of 6.5, while Quest Software is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. IFS holds a 2.6% mindshare in IAM, compared to Quest Software’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 31 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

5,297 Views
530 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Read 7 KACE Asset Management Appliance reviews

476 Views
476 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

IFS Cloud Platform and KACE Asset Management Appliance focus on enterprise resource planning and asset management, respectively. IFS Cloud Platform has an advantage in overall features and long-term value, while KACE is superior in specific asset management tasks, offering cost-effectiveness for niche needs.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform offers excellent integration capabilities, streamlined processes, and robust analytics. KACE Asset Management Appliance provides specialized asset tracking, inventory management, and remote control features.

Room for Improvement: IFS Cloud Platform could improve its deployment complexity, pricing transparency, and customization options. KACE Asset Management Appliance can enhance its analytics, user interface, and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KACE Asset Management Appliance features a quicker deployment cycle and extensive user support suited for IT environments. IFS Cloud Platform involves a more complex setup but offers strategic customer support and training resources.

Pricing and ROI: KACE Asset Management Appliance is more economically viable, with lower upfront costs ensuring quick ROI. IFS Cloud Platform requires a higher initial investment but offers potential for greater long-term ROI due to its extensive features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in IT Asset Management

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (35th), Customer Experience Management (9th), Field Service Management (2nd), Help Desk Software (21st), ERP (19th), Activity Based Costing Software (9th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (4th), Local Government CRM (15th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (19th), License Management (2nd)

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Ranking in IT Asset Management

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 2.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KACE Asset Management Appliance is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
KACE Asset Management Appliance	1.7%
IFS Cloud Platform	2.6%
Other	95.7%

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Thangaraj Ramasamy

Consultant at Arcwide

Has supported project management and business customization through strong modular flexibility

The cloud feature in IFS Cloud Platform is predominantly valuable, especially the enterprise asset management module, which IFS has very good business into, along with strong finance, project management, and supply chain management modules; these are the major modules that are performing well with IFS, and the cloud options along with user-friendly customizations for any technical developments are additional advantages. The integration of IoT with IFS Cloud Platform is performing well, enabling us to integrate with predominantly any third party through the standard inbuilt connectors that are readily available, and if we need to customize the integration, we can certainly do that too.

Read full review

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Remote control and massive deployment streamline operations efficiently

It seems that it is a bit difficult to learn and purchase. The requirement for employees to be certified before purchasing is understandable yet can be a hurdle. A focus on more simplicity and user-friendly features would be beneficial. More training deals, up-to-date articles, and improved documentation would help users navigate the solution more intuitively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The workflow of the solution is very good."

"There tends not to be a massive weakness in the product itself, as weaknesses can quickly be resolved in the next patch or the next release."

"The most valuable features of IFS Applications in the latest version are the new user Arena interface. It's from Apps 9, but it brings more flexibility in usage, especially around different devices, such as mobile usage, which doesn't restrict you from using a computer. We are it for the HR side, and it's proving quite good. It has a new modern feel to it similar to a standard cloud application which enhances the user experience."

"We could quickly understand what was going on and what the customer wanted to do."

"The main reason for the ERP project was to bring together our fourteen sites, which had until then worked in separate silos."

"All the modules are valuable in their own right, but everything has to go through the ERP. IFS has done an excellent job integrating the various modules to complete these processes. My expertise is in the finance module, but I have used the other verticals. It's an all-around good product."

"The product is quite flexible."

"One of our favorite features is the "Info-Zone", which provides operational intelligence in flight and in context to guide both business users and support teams to productivity."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"We have a support team here in India that has been helpful. We have not reached out to the global support for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance."

"The ability to work on printers and everything can be done remotely, which enhances functionality."

"The platform offers efficient stability."

"We use the solution for IT service desk management and asset management."

"The solution is scalable."

"We utilize the package management feature the most. We also use it for getting the inventory. Companies like us don't have an inventory or asset management system per se. A lot of companies, for instance, use SCCM as their asset management tool. We are using Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance for asset management, which is a good feature. The feature that I really like is to be able to upgrade to the Windows management systems or Windows version. It is very seamless, and I have found it fairly good."

"Feature-wise, I think it's more to do with the usability. It's pretty simple and it's got a very low learning curve, so that helps a lot. Feature-wise, things work pretty well as it's provided a lot of information available on the guides and the manuals, and things work as per the description."

Cons

"There are certain digital features that need to be incorporated, such as IOP."

"Aspects of HR and payroll could be better."

"I have seen that one of the areas that my company has identified for improvement might be the rental management capabilities within the solution."

"Documentation-wise, they need more."

"Technical support could be improved."

"IFS Applications can improve the reporting capabilities and increase the speed of feedback time in the IFS Applications. This would help with the overall performance of the solution and provide better experiences for customers."

"I'm a business analyst, so I do a lot of customer-facing work. I take calls from businesses I have to troubleshoot. One thing that bugs me is the error messages you get from IFS. If I get an error message, I have to dig to find the cause because, often, the error message doesn't precisely describe the problem. It'll hint about where the problem lies, but you have to work to find the root cause. It doesn't help in my situation. You expect an error message to point to the field or what is causing the issue."

"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The technical support my company receives from the implementation partners of the solution is not that great."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"Sometimes, it feels like the inventory it takes is not 100% accurate. I would say it is correct 90% of the time. We have had some issues. So, we have to rely on some factors of inconsistency in the data."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance could improve areas related to the management of updates, especially concerning new operating systems."

"A focus on more simplicity and user-friendly features would be beneficial."

"The first thing I don't like about KACE is that it needs to have a proper service desk. The categories and the command section do not reflect the users and the permanent users porting commands on updating. There is an issue and delay in loading the commands. We also want a proper structure for infrastructure management. Also, the AI chatbot and user template options are missing."

"The remote desktop tool they are using needs improvement. They have integrated some third-party tools for remote desktop connections but that is a bit complicated. That can be further simplified."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance can improve by incorporating AI and machine learning into the solution."

"The initial setup was burdensome."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."

"There's an additional yearly cost for support."

"The additional cost that comes with the solution includes the overhead of the people who are trying to fix the tool issues. These people are trying to reproduce the issue and report it to the technical support and testing with them which is huge. It is the cost of quality in the end."

"It is better to buy implementation services from IFS than from partners"

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

"It is less expensive as compared to SCCM."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance provides two remote desktop licenses which are helpful. The price of the solution is high, it would be beneficial if it was more flexible and less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

When it comes to AI, I feel that is the area where we expect something more from IFS Cloud Platform. They are working on IFS AI, but we have not explored much into that yet, and if they want to kee...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IFS Applications?

Currently, I am working with Arcwide, which is a service industry that predominantly focuses on IFS consulting, including IFS implementations, rollouts, upgrades, and support services.

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

The platform offers efficient stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

They are maybe on the higher end, however, their solutions suit bigger companies well. Building a solution out of smaller packages could end up being more expensive. Their pricing corresponds to th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IFS assyst vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

ServiceNow vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 23% of the time

Freshservice vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 22% of the time

Lansweeper vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 19% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 18% of the time

InvGate Assets vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 17% of the time

More KACE Asset Management Appliance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

January 2026

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

December 2025

Download KACE Asset Management Appliance product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

KACE Asset Management Appliance, KACE Asset Management

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

KACE Asset Management Appliance enhances asset usability with popular package management and inventory features, ideal for companies that lack systems. The tool provides seamless Windows upgrades, remote control, and deployment, making it essential for businesses managing multiple devices.

KACE Asset Management Appliance provides streamlined asset management, featuring prominent package management and inventory functionalities that support seamless Windows upgrades and remote control for bug fixing. Users greatly value its capabilities for remote printer work and automated compliance reporting. Suggested improvements include enhanced remote desktop integration, more precise inventory accuracy, and effective service desk features. Simplifying these elements, integrating AI for better image management and operating system deployment would enhance its effectiveness. Updated documentation, user-friendly features, and enhanced training are needed to overcome learning challenges and certification requirements.

What are the most important features of KACE Asset Management Appliance?

Usability with Low Learning Curve: Makes it accessible for organizations with limited IT resources.
Package Management and Inventory: Popular features for streamlined asset management.
Remote Control and Deployment: Allows for effective bug fixes across multiple devices.
Automated Compliance Reporting: Ensures up-to-date compliance without manual intervention.
Remote Printer Work: Facilitates management of remote printing tasks.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Consolidated Data Management: Combines data from multiple desktops and laptops.
Efficient IT Service Desk Management: Supports efficient handling of service desk tasks.
Seamless System Upgrades: Simplifies upgrading systems to new Windows releases.
Private Cloud Integration: Essential for organizations working within private cloud environments.
Scalability for Large Distributed Workforce: Suitable for businesses with over fifty employees and multiple clients.

This appliance is frequently implemented by companies for deploying Windows and non-Windows patches, managing IT service desks and assets, and facilitating software installations. Common within private cloud environments, it supports businesses managing over fifty employees, numerous clients, and a distributed workforce who need consolidated data management for effective IT operations.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Coastal Community Credit Union, St. Dominic Hospital

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

January 2026

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.