IFS Cloud Platform vs KACE Asset Management Appliance comparison

IFS and Quest Software are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. IFS is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quest Software is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. IFS holds a 1.9% mindshare in IAM, compared to Quest Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 30 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

4,095 Views
410 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Read 7 KACE Asset Management Appliance reviews

287 Views
287 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 19, 2025

IFS Cloud Platform and KACE Asset Management Appliance compete in enterprise resource planning and IT asset management. Data comparisons show IFS Cloud Platform has an advantage with integrations and scalability, while KACE offers specialized focus and intuitive features.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform offers robust ERP with advanced business support, high scalability, and seamless integration. KACE Asset Management Appliance provides detailed inventory management, software compliance capabilities, and remote control for managing multiple systems.

Room for Improvement: IFS Cloud Platform could benefit from streamlined deployment processes, improved user interface customization, and enhanced mobile accessibility. KACE Asset Management Appliance might improve its integration capabilities, expand reporting functionalities, and optimize asset tracking features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IFS Cloud Platform offers flexible yet resource-intensive deployment and a strong support structure suitable for various business needs. KACE Asset Management Appliance provides a straightforward, rapid deployment model with efficient support channels tailored for IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: IFS Cloud Platform requires a significant upfront investment but yields high ROI through its comprehensive features for large enterprises. KACE Asset Management Appliance is cost-effective with lower initial costs and quicker ROI, appealing to IT departments focused on efficient asset management.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in IT Asset Management

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (20th), Customer Experience Management (8th), Field Service Management (1st), Help Desk Software (12th), ERP (12th), Activity Based Costing Software (6th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (8th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th), License Management (2nd)

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Ranking in IT Asset Management

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KACE Asset Management Appliance is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Remote control and massive deployment streamline operations efficiently

It seems that it is a bit difficult to learn and purchase. The requirement for employees to be certified before purchasing is understandable yet can be a hurdle. A focus on more simplicity and user-friendly features would be beneficial. More training deals, up-to-date articles, and improved documentation would help users navigate the solution more intuitively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IFS has been completely rebuilt, modernized, and cloud-based so we don't need bulky software installations."

"Feature-wise, I like the way it provides inventory details...It is a stable solution."

"Individual user profiles that can be configured as templates to minimize data entry."

"There tends not to be a massive weakness in the product itself, as weaknesses can quickly be resolved in the next patch or the next release."

"The workflow of the solution is very good."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users."

"What I like about IFS Applications is that it's easier to use and implement than SAP. I also like that the IFS Applications team is more flexible than the SAP team."

"The product is quite flexible."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"We utilize the package management feature the most. We also use it for getting the inventory. Companies like us don't have an inventory or asset management system per se. A lot of companies, for instance, use SCCM as their asset management tool. We are using Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance for asset management, which is a good feature. The feature that I really like is to be able to upgrade to the Windows management systems or Windows version. It is very seamless, and I have found it fairly good."

"The platform offers efficient stability."

"We use the solution for IT service desk management and asset management."

"The ability to work on printers and everything can be done remotely, which enhances functionality."

"Feature-wise, I think it's more to do with the usability. It's pretty simple and it's got a very low learning curve, so that helps a lot. Feature-wise, things work pretty well as it's provided a lot of information available on the guides and the manuals, and things work as per the description."

"We have a support team here in India that has been helpful. We have not reached out to the global support for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance."

"The solution is scalable."

Cons

"IFS Applications is not robust enough to handle high-volume transactions, so it's not suitable for larger enterprises."

"I have seen that one of the areas that my company has identified for improvement might be the rental management capabilities within the solution."

"IFS Applications can improve the reporting capabilities and increase the speed of feedback time in the IFS Applications. This would help with the overall performance of the solution and provide better experiences for customers."

"The solution needs to improve its documentation and user-friendliness."

"It would be ideal if, in the future, the product could incorporate IoT and blockchain elements. We'd like to explore more of these types of features going forward."

"I'm a business analyst, so I do a lot of customer-facing work. I take calls from businesses I have to troubleshoot. One thing that bugs me is the error messages you get from IFS. If I get an error message, I have to dig to find the cause because, often, the error message doesn't precisely describe the problem. It'll hint about where the problem lies, but you have to work to find the root cause. It doesn't help in my situation. You expect an error message to point to the field or what is causing the issue."

"The solution's reporting tools still require improvement."

"The support provided by IFS Applications has room for improvement. I'm based in Poland, and when my company had an issue, finding people from IFS to give my company the support it needed was difficult."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"A focus on more simplicity and user-friendly features would be beneficial."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance could improve areas related to the management of updates, especially concerning new operating systems."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance can improve by incorporating AI and machine learning into the solution."

"Sometimes, it feels like the inventory it takes is not 100% accurate. I would say it is correct 90% of the time. We have had some issues. So, we have to rely on some factors of inconsistency in the data."

"The first thing I don't like about KACE is that it needs to have a proper service desk. The categories and the command section do not reflect the users and the permanent users porting commands on updating. There is an issue and delay in loading the commands. We also want a proper structure for infrastructure management. Also, the AI chatbot and user template options are missing."

"The initial setup was burdensome."

"The remote desktop tool they are using needs improvement. They have integrated some third-party tools for remote desktop connections but that is a bit complicated. That can be further simplified."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions."

"Compared to SAP, the pricing for IFS Applications was very affordable. People using the solution would find that it's worth the money."

"There's an additional yearly cost for support."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"Ask for all-inclusive pricing, as they are pretty flexible if you ask for custom models."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"It is less expensive as compared to SCCM."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance provides two remote desktop licenses which are helpful. The price of the solution is high, it would be beneficial if it was more flexible and less expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

The platform offers efficient stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

They are maybe on the higher end, however, their solutions suit bigger companies well. Building a solution out of smaller packages could end up being more expensive. Their pricing corresponds to th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

ServiceNow vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 100% of the time

More KACE Asset Management Appliance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

August 2025

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

January 2025

Download KACE Asset Management Appliance product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

KACE Asset Management Appliance, KACE Asset Management

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

KACE Asset Management Appliance enhances asset usability with popular package management and inventory features, ideal for companies that lack systems. The tool provides seamless Windows upgrades, remote control, and deployment, making it essential for businesses managing multiple devices.

KACE Asset Management Appliance provides streamlined asset management, featuring prominent package management and inventory functionalities that support seamless Windows upgrades and remote control for bug fixing. Users greatly value its capabilities for remote printer work and automated compliance reporting. Suggested improvements include enhanced remote desktop integration, more precise inventory accuracy, and effective service desk features. Simplifying these elements, integrating AI for better image management and operating system deployment would enhance its effectiveness. Updated documentation, user-friendly features, and enhanced training are needed to overcome learning challenges and certification requirements.

What are the most important features of KACE Asset Management Appliance?

Usability with Low Learning Curve: Makes it accessible for organizations with limited IT resources.
Package Management and Inventory: Popular features for streamlined asset management.
Remote Control and Deployment: Allows for effective bug fixes across multiple devices.
Automated Compliance Reporting: Ensures up-to-date compliance without manual intervention.
Remote Printer Work: Facilitates management of remote printing tasks.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Consolidated Data Management: Combines data from multiple desktops and laptops.
Efficient IT Service Desk Management: Supports efficient handling of service desk tasks.
Seamless System Upgrades: Simplifies upgrading systems to new Windows releases.
Private Cloud Integration: Essential for organizations working within private cloud environments.
Scalability for Large Distributed Workforce: Suitable for businesses with over fifty employees and multiple clients.

This appliance is frequently implemented by companies for deploying Windows and non-Windows patches, managing IT service desks and assets, and facilitating software installations. Common within private cloud environments, it supports businesses managing over fifty employees, numerous clients, and a distributed workforce who need consolidated data management for effective IT operations.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Coastal Community Credit Union, St. Dominic Hospital

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

July 2025

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.