IBM Maximo Application Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform comparison

IBM Maximo Application Suite vs. IFS Cloud Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo Application Suite

Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Billing Software (5th)

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (29th), Customer Experience Management (11th), Field Service Management (2nd), Help Desk Software (16th), ERP (20th), Activity Based Costing Software (10th), Local Government CRM (9th), IT Asset Management (13th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (14th), License Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo Application Suite is 12.1%, down from 25.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 6.6%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Maximo Application Suite	12.1%
IFS Cloud Platform	6.6%
Other	81.3%

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

Featured Reviews

Antony Mishra

Java Software Engineer at GPA

Asset management has become streamlined and decision-making is now driven by lifecycle data

The best features IBM Maximo offers are that it is very simple to deploy on OpenShift using Ansible playbooks. It also has excellent support for integration, is simple to configure, and the asset register is very straightforward. Work management and managing inventory are seamless. In terms of integration support, I have used preventive maintenance, work generation, accurate work execution planning, tracking actuals, and I can easily integrate with other tools and systems. IBM Maximo Suite gives me a single place where service cycles are standardized and tied to compliance. IBM Maximo has positively impacted my organization as it has been a very useful tool. It reduced human error by moving away from pen and paper-based scheduling. It saved cost by minimizing unexpected downtime of assets, with approximately 50% of time being saved. We have also reduced overwork among staff by removing redundant information and smoothing task flows. It helps us scale our team without micromanaging small issues.

Read full review

reviewer2268153

Cloud Operations Engineer

Integrated planning has improved production scheduling and now reduces downtime and costs

The biggest friction point I have run into with IFS Cloud Platform is user adoption, which has been the biggest challenge, as different users in the organization need to get accustomed to the new processes after years of using spreadsheets and legacy systems, requiring training and a mindset shift, along with challenging data migration and process standardization. My advice to someone considering IFS Cloud Platform with a similar workflow is to spend sufficient time understanding and standardizing their business processes before implementing it, as the technology is very powerful, but the real value comes when processes, data, and teams are all aligned. I would rate my overall experience with IFS Cloud Platform as a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For what it represents and what it gives you, it is a very powerful tool."

"IBM Maximo is the most stable solution that I have ever seen."

"IBM Maximo has positively impacted my organization as it has been a very useful tool, reducing human error by moving away from pen and paper-based scheduling, saving cost by minimizing unexpected downtime of assets with approximately 50% of time being saved, and reducing overwork among staff by removing redundant information and smoothing task flows."

"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."

"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."

"If it's not the best EAM product, it is one of the best out there."

"They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc."

"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."

More IBM Maximo Application Suite pros

"All the modules are valuable in their own right, but everything has to go through the ERP. IFS has done an excellent job integrating the various modules to complete these processes. My expertise is in the finance module, but I have used the other verticals. It's an all-around good product."

"Individual user profiles that can be configured as templates to minimize data entry."

"The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."

"We applied the ISO 20000 standard using Assyst."

"Apart from the pressures of meeting 14 go-live dates, this has been a very positive experience and has led to a streamlined and effective business."

"Prior to using the IFS site, it was quite difficult for us to track, access, and extract the inventory available to us, and once we started using IFS, it introduced us to a way to track and monitor the inventory, which from a user perspective is extremely useful for us."

"We could quickly understand what was going on and what the customer wanted to do."

"Our client has benefited as follows: Reduced transaction time, better visibility, easier tracking, more control on business and automation, and better agility with the ability to move swiftly as times and market conditions change."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

Cons

"Coding can be complex when customization is required."

"Vendor management needs enhancement."

"From that perspective, the UI is quite old-fashioned, and that would be one of my main concerns."

"One way IBM Maximo can be improved is that the interface is not modern or particularly user-friendly."

"Whenever we are trying to create an application from scratch, there are some things we cannot do, or when we are trying to reuse XML things, we need to duplicate the same logic and then keep it with a new ID and then use it."

"Maximo is a big system, so the initial setup is complex."

"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."

More IBM Maximo Application Suite cons

"Documentation-wise, they need more."

"The initial implementation was more complex than expected."

"When it comes to AI, I feel that is the area where we expect something more from IFS Cloud Platform."

"Customization needs to be improved."

"Sometimes from the sales perspective, clients don't always fully understand how large a task or a project they're getting involved in when they decide, "We're going to switch across to IFS." They could probably do a little bit more, maybe around preparing people for these projects."

"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The technical support my company receives from the implementation partners of the solution is not that great."

"Customization can only be done by IFS and not by the clients themselves."

"However, if we had any bids with the other products Assyst unfortunately would have lost the bids."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing."

"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."

"$USD700 per agent user."

"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."

"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."

"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the pricing a nine. The price is very high."

"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."

More IBM Maximo Application Suite pricing and cost advice

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Maximo?

There are a couple of places, but I cannot name one at this moment because I still need to go through more of the things because there is a lot which I need to learn. Something related to the custo...

What is your primary use case for IBM Maximo?

I generally develop IBM Maximo reports and then some automation scripts, and the major thing which I have customized is an application called Archival solution that we created from scratch. For the...

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Maximo?

AI Watson, I have not used it so far. I was trying to use it, but there are some challenges for me to use it. I will definitely try to give a review once I use it. I have not used it so far. I will...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

There are features that came up during implementation that we are not actually using today, such as field service management (FSM), because we do not have any field technicians visiting customer si...

What is your primary use case for IFS Applications?

My main use case for IFS Cloud Platform is for production planning, where I typically use it for production scheduling and for inventory management. When I open IFS Cloud Platform, the first thing ...

ServiceNow vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

Comparisons

Compared 35% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

Compared 6% of the time

Hexagon EAM vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Asset Management vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Asset Performance Management vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Maximo Application Suite Competitors

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 3% of the time

IFS assyst vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Maximo Application Suite

Download IBM Maximo Application Suite product report

IFS Cloud Platform

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

Maximo

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

Overview

IBM Maximo offers advanced asset management with preventive maintenance, asset tracking, and integration capabilities. Its flexibility boosts efficiency and reduces downtime.

Known for its robust asset lifecycle management, IBM Maximo integrates with financial platforms and IoT data sources. It supports maintenance management, process digitization, and inventory purchasing, proving ideal for industries like manufacturing and energy. Users find its predictive maintenance and central asset management key to cost reduction and efficiency.

What are the most important features of IBM Maximo?

Preventive Maintenance: Optimize asset uptime through scheduled tasks and checks.
Asset Tracking: Monitor and manage assets across locations and systems.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connect with financial platforms and IoT sources.
Predictive Maintenance: Anticipate potential failures to minimize downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Gain insights through detailed analytics and reports.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Downtime: Efficient maintenance and asset tracking reduce productivity losses.
Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Configurability and integration streamline processes.
Cost Savings: Preventive strategies and predictive analytics cut operational expenses.
Agnostic Integration: Easily adapts to existing systems for smooth operations.
Ease of Use: Intuitive interface supports quick adoption and implementation.

IBM Maximo is widely adopted in manufacturing, telecommunications, and energy sectors, excelling in asset lifecycle management and maintenance processes. Industries enhance efficiency with its centralized management, predictive maintenance, and improved information sharing, aligning operations with comprehensive asset strategies.

IBM

IFS Cloud Platform offers a modern, adaptable enterprise management tool with a user-friendly design, providing seamless integration and customizable modules for efficient operations.

IFS Cloud Platform streamlines enterprise processes through its cloud-based architecture, favoring adaptability and swift updates. It supports industry standards and offers deep analytics and flexible customization, benefiting industries like aerospace, defense, and manufacturing. Despite needing enhancements in documentation, mobile compatibility, and reporting tools, it remains a viable choice for comprehensive ERP applications in finance, HR, and supply chain management. Integration with systems such as Azure and NetSuite further optimizes manufacturing schedules.

What are the key features of IFS Cloud Platform?

Modern Design: Offers an intuitive interface.
REST APIs: Enables seamless integration.
Customizable Modules: Enhances finance and service management.
Analytics: Provides deep insights into operations.
Cloud-Based: Ensures quick updates and adaptability.
Industry Standards: Supports service-oriented architecture.

What benefits or ROI should be considered in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines enterprise management.
Enhanced Connectivity: Facilitates system integration.
Flexibility: Customizable to business needs.
Improved Operations: Optimizes schedules and resources.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive in enterprise solutions.

In aerospace and defense, IFS Cloud Platform assists with planning and scheduling, while in manufacturing, it manages inventory and service management efficiently. Companies implement it for ERP applications across finance, HR, and supply chain, integrating with Azure and NetSuite to enhance IT service management and project-based scenarios, leveraging its AI-driven PSO component.

IFS

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

IBM Maximo Application Suite vs. IFS Cloud Platform