OpenText 360 for SharePoint and IBM BPM are competing products in enterprise software. OpenText focuses on seamless Microsoft integration, while IBM BPM is preferred for its extensive feature set, despite higher costs.
Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint excels in integration with Microsoft products, offers document management, and enhances collaboration. IBM BPM provides robust process management tools, comprehensive analytics, and high scalability.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its feature set to better compete with IBM's offering and expand scalability for non-Microsoft environments. Its user interface requires modernization, and analytics capabilities could be improved. IBM BPM could improve deployment simplicity, reduce associated costs, and enhance integration with non-IBM systems. Additionally, its learning curve for new users could be reduced.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers straightforward deployment, particularly within Microsoft ecosystems, supported by reliable customer service. IBM BPM offers strong customer service for large-scale deployments, although its deployment process can be complex.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint features lower setup costs and quick ROI, which appeal to cost-conscious organizations. IBM BPM has higher initial costs but promises significant long-term ROI through its comprehensive features and scalability, suiting larger enterprises.
The return on investment provided by OpenText 360 for SharePoint is excellent, and that is why we are continuing this team for the past 3 years.
It eliminates the challenges associated with handling files on local servers and allows efficient document management.
The customer service is outstanding.
On a scale from 1 to 10, support deserves a rating of 7 to 8.
We had a contract that provided on-site support, which was very satisfactory.
I have not directly contacted vendor support but use forums for any queries or issues while utilizing OpenText 360 for SharePoint.
The solution has scalability issues; on a scale, I would rate it at eight out of ten.
The architecture of the solution offers scalability; we can scale both vertically and horizontally.
I found IBM BPM to be scalable to a certain level but it struggled with large volumes of concurrent transactions.
IBM BPM also lacks smaller solutions, so I must purchase multiple solutions to start with workflows and applications.
Although IBM BPM is a substantial product, adopting and integrating new technologies quickly is not easy due to the migration and upgrade paths involved.
If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful.
Integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to specific individuals for follow-up.
The GUI should be improved for better user experience.
SAP is more expensive, but IBM BPM is very expensive.
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 suite, costing around five dollars per user.
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft.
As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft partners, where organizations receive yearly discounts.
The integration capabilities of IBM BPM are excellent.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices.
The metadata can be retrieved from the SharePoint list, and those libraries and metadata serve as a very effective way that I am utilizing SharePoint, apart from just storing documents.
IBM BPM is a business process management tool that provides a robust set of tools to author, test, and deploy business processes, as well as full visibility and insight to managing those business processes. The solution provides tooling and run time for process design, execution, monitoring, and optimization, along with basic system integration support. To support various levels of complexity and involvement with business process management, there are two different editions of the product: IBM BPM and IBM BPM Express.
IBM BPM Features
IBM BPM has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
IBM BPM Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing IBM BPM. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
IBM BPM is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it’s good for developing complex apps, is robust, and has helpful team management and process performance features.
Zoran C., Owner/CEO at IT SPHERE, says, “It is perfect if you have to develop complex apps without much coding (only java script). It is also good if you don't have much IT resources in your company and would like to involve business analysts in the process of developing apps. My opinion is that it can do about 50% of all developers' work.”
Suhas V., BPM Architect at GBM, mentions, “Overall the solution is robust and has the ability to integrate with any product for complex workflows."
A BPM Consultant at a financial services firm comments, "Some of the features that I like the most are team management and process performance. They are both very useful and very powerful with regard to the workflow."
A Digital Banking & Innovation Director at a financial services firm expresses, “The processing functionality makes it easy to change processes and workflows easily.”
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
