CrossBrowserTesting vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

SmartBear and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while Oracle is ranked #25. SmartBear holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

512 Views
286 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

845 Views
443 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and CrossBrowserTesting are competitive products in software testing and quality assurance. CrossBrowserTesting stands out for its feature-rich platform and cross-browser testing capabilities, making it a strong choice.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers automated regression testing, comprehensive test management, and load testing. CrossBrowserTesting provides seamless integration with various browsers and devices, end-to-end testing capabilities, and a powerful cloud testing platform.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve in user interface complexity, cloud deployment options, and initial setup costs. CrossBrowserTesting may enhance device coverage, offer more in-depth testing analytics, and streamline its session initiation process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides a sophisticated on-premise deployment model with tailored enterprise solutions and substantial support. CrossBrowserTesting uses a cloud-based deployment model that is quick and user-friendly, with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite has a significant setup cost but aligns with enterprise-grade functionality, promising long-term ROI. CrossBrowserTesting offers a cost-effective, cloud-oriented model with quick returns and minimal initial investment, appealing to organizations seeking fast ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The screen shot portal is essential for an easy way to run tests across hundreds of browsers and retrieve screenshots which then indicate success or failure."

"I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team."

"The support team is top-notch. I have a great relationship with them. They are extremely honest and responsive."

"The ability to replay sessions is valuable for tracking down issues."

"With screenshots, I can quickly verify a page looks universally good in minutes."

"I am able to continuously test my new releases across browser versions without issues."

"This solution helps lower the overhead cost associated with buying multiple devices."

"I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"The solution is scalable."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default."

"The "Getting Started" documentation for Selenium testing could be improved."

"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."

"I have experienced some lagging issues, and it does not seem like all of the testing environments are configured the same."

"There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting."

"A wider range of physical devices with more browser versions in the Selenium Grid would be great to insure users with out-of-date devices are able to interact with our sites."

"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

"Sometimes the testing is slow."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 81% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 19% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 34% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

June 2025

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

June 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

OATS

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.