CrossBrowserTesting vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

SmartBear and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while Oracle is ranked #25. SmartBear holds a 0.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

562 Views
417 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

898 Views
531 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and CrossBrowserTesting are competitive products in software testing and quality assurance. CrossBrowserTesting stands out for its feature-rich platform and cross-browser testing capabilities, making it a strong choice.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers automated regression testing, comprehensive test management, and load testing. CrossBrowserTesting provides seamless integration with various browsers and devices, end-to-end testing capabilities, and a powerful cloud testing platform.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve in user interface complexity, cloud deployment options, and initial setup costs. CrossBrowserTesting may enhance device coverage, offer more in-depth testing analytics, and streamline its session initiation process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides a sophisticated on-premise deployment model with tailored enterprise solutions and substantial support. CrossBrowserTesting uses a cloud-based deployment model that is quick and user-friendly, with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite has a significant setup cost but aligns with enterprise-grade functionality, promising long-term ROI. CrossBrowserTesting offers a cost-effective, cloud-oriented model with quick returns and minimal initial investment, appealing to organizations seeking fast ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Load Testing Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Michael Hutchison

Web Specialist at Mayo Clinic

Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems

The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default. Every time, I have to select the full screen, then restart its captures, which seems a waste of time and energy. This is, admittedly, a minor complaint.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The support team is top-notch. I have a great relationship with them. They are extremely honest and responsive."

"It was the perfect solution that saved us time and money to perform web viewing tests on real devices, which allowed our team to correct multiple failures in devices."

"I must acknowledge that the customer support has been A++ when I have run into problems."

"CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing."

"This solution helps lower the overhead cost associated with buying multiple devices."

"Video recording of the script running in a cloud server."

"The CrossBrowserTesting Selenium API and live test features have greatly improved our team's ability to quickly and effectively perform QA."

"Selenium Grid allows testing multiple platforms to insure functionality for most users."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"The function test feature is valuable."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"The solution is scalable."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"Elements of 'real' mobile/tablet testing could be sped up."

"I have had quite a few issues trying to use a virtual machine to test our application on."

"It would be useful if we can run the live-testing test cases on multiple platforms at the same time, instead of waiting for one session to finish."

"A wider range of physical devices with more browser versions in the Selenium Grid would be great to insure users with out-of-date devices are able to interact with our sites."

"There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting."

"Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing."

"A problem that we are facing quite often is related to the network connection. Tests can fail if the remote CrossBrowserTesting's VM has connection problems. This happens mostly with browsers of Internet Explorer family which work on Windows OS."

"The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 71% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 13% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 35% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 11% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

May 2025

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

OATS

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2025

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.