CrossBrowserTesting vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

SmartBear and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #26, while Oracle is ranked #22. SmartBear holds a 1.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

1,008 Views
877 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,793 Views
1,004 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and CrossBrowserTesting are competitive products in software testing and quality assurance. CrossBrowserTesting stands out for its feature-rich platform and cross-browser testing capabilities, making it a strong choice.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers automated regression testing, comprehensive test management, and load testing. CrossBrowserTesting provides seamless integration with various browsers and devices, end-to-end testing capabilities, and a powerful cloud testing platform.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve in user interface complexity, cloud deployment options, and initial setup costs. CrossBrowserTesting may enhance device coverage, offer more in-depth testing analytics, and streamline its session initiation process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides a sophisticated on-premise deployment model with tailored enterprise solutions and substantial support. CrossBrowserTesting uses a cloud-based deployment model that is quick and user-friendly, with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite has a significant setup cost but aligns with enterprise-grade functionality, promising long-term ROI. CrossBrowserTesting offers a cost-effective, cloud-oriented model with quick returns and minimal initial investment, appealing to organizations seeking fast ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (13th), Load Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.7%
CrossBrowserTesting	1.6%
Other	96.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to choose from many devices is the best feature."

"The extensive range of products available to simulate is something I have come to appreciate as it has resulted in an ability to broaden the scope of our tests."

"It helps to speed up the process to test the product in different devices and browsers, making it easy to troubleshoot some issues."

"Selenium Grid allows testing multiple platforms to insure functionality for most users."

"Record and Replay is the most used functionality for us, as we can record the test cases and play them on multiple combinations of platforms."

"Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

"The ability to replay sessions is valuable for tracking down issues."

"I must acknowledge that the customer support has been A++ when I have run into problems."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"I can organize test scripts pretty well."

"Implementation of Oracle Application Testing Suite package has increased the overall efficiency."

"It helped in running performance testing cycles and identifying the bottlenecks of the application, helping our clients to run their application successfully and smoothly."

"This product can facilitate the lowering of test execution times for operational people, as the bulk of the repeating test steps can be taken away by automating the EBS regression set in OpenScript every release."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"The speed connection in mobile devices could be improved, because sometimes the load time is uncertain."

"A problem that we are facing quite often is related to the network connection. Tests can fail if the remote CrossBrowserTesting's VM has connection problems. This happens mostly with browsers of Internet Explorer family which work on Windows OS."

"I have experienced some lagging issues, and it does not seem like all of the testing environments are configured the same."

"The "Getting Started" documentation for Selenium testing could be improved."

"The speed to connect to mobile devices needs improvement, and sometimes the connection fails."

"The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default."

"Sometimes the testing is slow."

"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"The tool runs out of memory when the recording flows are long and involve many screens despite increasing the memory settings for OpenScript."

"Room for improvement would be for the reporting features. If they could improve the dashboards, that would be helpful."

"OATS has some promising features that frankly we wish we could utilize, but so far we haven’t had much luck doing so."

"It does not provide easy diagnostics to ascertain end to end transaction monitoring."

"OTM Test Report – We needed to develop custom reports as there is less flexibility."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Performing Arts

Government

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 18% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 8% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 6% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

March 2026

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

OATS

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2026

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.