OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and CrossBrowserTesting compete in the software testing domain. OpenText is often preferred for its enterprise-level robust testing environment, while CrossBrowserTesting holds the upper hand with its comprehensive device compatibility features, ideal for diverse test environments.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers provides advanced scripting capabilities, integration with multiple development environments, and extensive test suite support. CrossBrowserTesting offers superior device and browser compatibility testing, real-time testing across platforms, and the ability to perform live browser testing, enhancing its adaptability to diverse environments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance support for modern testing methodologies and streamline its complex interface. Expanding integrations with newer development tools would also be beneficial. CrossBrowserTesting could improve its interface for ease of use, offer better analytics features, and enhance support for automated testing scripts.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText requires a more complex deployment setup, demanding technical expertise, but provides dedicated customer support resources. CrossBrowserTesting offers a straightforward deployment model with responsive support, making it appealing for quicker setup and troubleshooting.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher initial setup costs but delivers significant long-term ROI with its extensive capabilities. CrossBrowserTesting provides more affordable initial pricing and faster ROI with flexible, pay-as-you-go models.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
CrossBrowserTesting | 1.0% |
Other | 96.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 9 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 10 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 2 |
Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.