SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers are prominent competitors in the software testing automation category. Based on user reviews and feature assessments, TestComplete seems to have the upper hand due to its superior object recognition and flexibility.
Features: SmartBear TestComplete supports desktop and web applications, offering features like the Object Browser, test modularization, and data-driven testing. It supports multiple scripting languages and cross-browser testing. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is developer-focused, integrating seamlessly with developer tools and offering strong AI-driven features. It provides robust integration with JIRA, making it suitable for development-centered testing scenarios.
Room for Improvement: TestComplete users report challenges with dynamic object capturing, particularly in web and mobile testing, and find its licensing system cumbersome, especially with virtual machines. The Object Spy tool and cross-browser scripting present additional concerns. OpenText could enhance support for desktop applications and object recognition across varied technologies. Users also note the need for better integration with CI/CD pipelines and headless testing capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offer deployment options for on-premises and public cloud environments. While SmartBear is recognized for prompt customer service, technical support efficiency could be improved. OpenText provides satisfactory customer service, but enhancements in technical support for complex issue resolution are desirable. Both platforms benefit from valuable community support; however, SmartBear is often recognized as more responsive.
Pricing and ROI: SmartBear TestComplete is viewed as cost-effective, with varied licensing models, though some users find floating licenses expensive. It is credited with significantly reducing testing times, delivering noticeable ROI. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is often deemed expensive due to higher licensing fees, which can deter smaller organizations. Despite this, both products reportedly deliver substantial ROI by cutting down on manual testing time, with TestComplete offering more value for the cost compared to OpenText.
Once set up, only one person is needed to handle all tasks, reducing the requirement for multiple personnel.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SmartBear TestComplete | 5.9% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.5% |
| Other | 91.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
What is SmartBear TestComplete?
TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.
TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.
TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:
Key Features
Reviews from Real Users
Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”
Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
