SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the automation testing category. TestComplete often has the upper hand due to its robust scripting capabilities and comprehensive object management features.
Features: TestComplete offers extensive automation capabilities for desktop, mobile, and web applications. Its comprehensive object management through Object Browser, superior user scripting across multiple languages, and adaptability for diverse testing needs make it highly valued. OpenText also supports automation for desktop and web applications with integration to development environments, providing users ease of use and flexibility. It excels in GUI testing and integrates effectively with other frameworks like N-unit, providing a seamless testing experience.
Room for Improvement: TestComplete struggles with its web and mobile frameworks, especially in dynamic object recognition and virtual machine licensing issues. OpenText has difficulty recognizing elements in complex desktop applications and presents a steep learning curve, potentially limiting usability. Both products could enhance their support for cloud environments to better meet modern deployment needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both TestComplete and OpenText primarily offer on-premises deployment with limited cloud options. Users often report that SmartBear's customer service provides more reliability and quicker resolution times than OpenText, which can be crucial for fast-paced development cycles.
Pricing and ROI: SmartBear TestComplete is perceived as expensive, but its modular pricing offers flexibility for varied testing needs, suggesting better value for larger enterprises. OpenText's licensing costs are considered high, with user perception favoring more affordable open-source alternatives, impacting its ROI compared to TestComplete.
Once set up, only one person is needed to handle all tasks, reducing the requirement for multiple personnel.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
What is SmartBear TestComplete?
TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.
TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.
TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:
Key Features
Reviews from Real Users
Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”
Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
