Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText
3.7 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers accelerates software testing automation, reducing lead time and increasing productivity.
It integrates well with other products and testing frameworks like Visual Studio, enhancing its versatility.
The tool supports regulation compliance for industries like banking, making it trustworthy for sensitive applications.
The object repository function simplifies object identification, significantly cutting down on automation testing development time.
The tool is scalable and supports testing across various protocols and applications, including SAP, Siebel, .Net, and pdf.

CONS

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.
The parallel execution of tests needs improvement, particularly in executing tests simultaneously across different browsers like IE, Microsoft Edge, Chrome, and Mozilla.
It requires high-level development skills, and scripting is essential, making it development-intensive and unsuitable for teams without software engineering backgrounds.
The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio is limited, only supporting Visual Studio 2019 and up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8 despite newer releases.
Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls, schedulers, and calendars, making customized solutions often necessary.
 

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Pros review quotes

it_user366099 - PeerSpot reviewer
Entity Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jan 6, 2016
It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE.
TestMana6b72 - PeerSpot reviewer
Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Aug 19, 2019
It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry.
NA
Director, Information Technology Infrastructure at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Aug 25, 2019
One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PE
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Sep 15, 2019
The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf.
it_user964113 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect and Test Tool Designer at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
Oct 16, 2019
The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks.
reviewer782295 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 13, 2019
The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working.
reviewer1270638 - PeerSpot reviewer
Programator at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Jan 22, 2020
The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.
reviewer1273218 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Tester at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Jan 26, 2020
The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local.
reviewer1203198 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager PMO Specialists at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
May 25, 2020
The most valuable feature is stability.
DS
Team Leader at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Oct 25, 2020
The cost is the most important factor in this tool.
 

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Cons review quotes

it_user366099 - PeerSpot reviewer
Entity Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jan 6, 2016
We push one button and the tests are completely executed at once, so just have to analyze and say it's okay. It would be nice if this could be entirely automated.
TestMana6b72 - PeerSpot reviewer
Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Aug 19, 2019
It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.
NA
Director, Information Technology Infrastructure at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Aug 25, 2019
The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PE
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Sep 15, 2019
It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute.
it_user964113 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect and Test Tool Designer at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
Oct 16, 2019
UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive.
reviewer782295 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 13, 2019
The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years.
reviewer1270638 - PeerSpot reviewer
Programator at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Jan 22, 2020
The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.
reviewer1273218 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Tester at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Jan 26, 2020
It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.
reviewer1203198 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager PMO Specialists at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
May 25, 2020
Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful.
DS
Team Leader at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Oct 25, 2020
In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable.