CrossBrowserTesting vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

The compared SmartBear and Inflectra solutions aren't in the same category. SmartBear is ranked #28 in FT , and holds a 1.0% mindshare in the category. Inflectra is ranked #21 in TAt , with an average rating of 4.0, and holds a 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

550 Views
495 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

531 Views
175 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and Inflectra Rapise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Inflectra Rapise

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (28th)

Inflectra Rapise

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. CrossBrowserTesting is designed for Functional Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.0%, up 0.8% compared to last year.
Inflectra Rapise, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 0.3% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CrossBrowserTesting	1.0%
Tricentis Tosca	18.4%
BrowserStack	10.0%
Other	70.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Inflectra Rapise	0.3%
Tricentis Tosca	20.4%
OpenText Functional Testing	8.7%
Other	70.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team."

"SmartBear has excellent, informative webinars, so keep an eye out for those."

"Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

"CBT has made it easier to troubleshoot issues across devices when we do not have actual access to those specific devices. I even opt for CBT sometimes when we do have access to the device just because it is easier."

"With screenshots, I can quickly verify a page looks universally good in minutes."

"I must acknowledge that the customer support has been A++ when I have run into problems."

"This solution helps lower the overhead cost associated with buying multiple devices."

"The ability to choose from many devices is the best feature."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

Cons

"The "Getting Started" documentation for Selenium testing could be improved."

"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."

"A wider range of physical devices with more browser versions in the Selenium Grid would be great to insure users with out-of-date devices are able to interact with our sites."

"Sometimes the testing is slow."

"I have had quite a few issues trying to use a virtual machine to test our application on."

"I have experienced some lagging issues, and it does not seem like all of the testing environments are configured the same."

"There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting."

"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

26%

Government

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 73% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 14% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

October 2025

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

September 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rapise

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Inflectra Rapise

September 2025

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.