CrossBrowserTesting vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared SmartBear and Inflectra solutions aren't in the same category. SmartBear is ranked #29 in FT , and holds a 1.3% mindshare in the category. Inflectra is ranked #22 in TAt , and holds a 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

2,226 Views
1,937 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

3,664 Views
1,466 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and Inflectra Rapise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (29th)

Inflectra Rapise

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (39th), Test Automation Tools (22nd), AI Quality Assurance (4th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. CrossBrowserTesting is designed for Functional Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, up 1.0% compared to last year.
Inflectra Rapise, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 1.5% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CrossBrowserTesting	1.3%
Tricentis Tosca	9.4%
OpenText Functional Testing	8.5%
Other	80.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Inflectra Rapise	1.5%
Tricentis Tosca	10.5%
OpenText Functional Testing	8.2%
Other	79.8%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, the product does what we need and does it well."

"CrossBrowserTesting helps a lot with the responsive testing in different mobiles and browsers and has good tools for our testing like taking videos and screenshots."

"We no longer need to have a full QA team, testing is more quickly and reliably reproduced, and scheduled daily tests assist in catching any bugs which fall through the cracks and make it to the production environment."

"I must acknowledge that the customer support has been A++ when I have run into problems."

"The most valuable feature is that it gives us real OS devices that are available to test, and we don't have to ensure that all of the devices are up to date."

"Aside from speeding up our processes, it also allowed us to tie in our automated test scenarios and integrate our reporting tools to make the entire process efficient and hassle free."

"The ability to replay sessions is valuable for tracking down issues."

"The CrossBrowserTesting Selenium API and live test features have greatly improved our team's ability to quickly and effectively perform QA."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"The scripting of this tool is easy and user friendly."

"We saved thousands of dollars because the Rapise implementation gave us 30 or more executions for every release compared to three or four, so huge savings on manual testing effort plus easy detection of defects is very cost effective."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"The first time I used Rapise I completed the automation scripts for a full application in a day and I was shocked how easy it was."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"The initial setup was straightforward; it wasn't complex at all, and we found it nice and easy."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"It's incredible but the support and maintenance of Inflectra Rapise's scripts is less than 30% of the effort that was involved in maintaining Selenium, it is very easy and this is the reason that we are switching everything that needs handling from Selenium to Inflectra Rapise, as it is easy to maintain and provides a benefit in cost and efforts with a 90% reduction factor in the maintenance of the scripts."

More Inflectra Rapise pros

Cons

"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."

"Sometimes the testing is slow."

"Elements of 'real' mobile/tablet testing could be sped up, as I still sometimes experience lag, which no one loves."

"The "Getting Started" documentation for Selenium testing could be improved."

"The five minute timeouts can cause irritation if you have just popped away to consult some supporting documentation."

"Automated testing could be improved."

"I had some problems with the local connection, but there is someone that can help us always on customer support chat."

"I have experienced some lagging issues, and it does not seem like all of the testing environments are configured the same."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"I faced one problem where it can't validate the colour of images and text. Also, it could not automate the mobile app, and this needs to be included."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"When there are failures in a nightly run of batches of scripts, it can create a blocking situation where all the following scripts will fail due to unexpected results."

"The maintenance is very difficult."

"What I have noticed about Rapise is that sometimes when you keep on using the same script, it fails many times."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It has some stability issues where the tool crashes sometimes on Windows 10."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

19%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 13% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 4% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 4% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 4% of the time

Hyland RPA vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 3% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

October 2026

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

September 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rapise

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting provides comprehensive live and automated testing across browsers and devices, helping teams ensure functionality and compatibility through features like record and replay, and real device access.

CrossBrowserTesting is a robust tool for quality assurance professionals focusing on cross-browser compatibility and feature validation across multiple devices and operating systems. It assists in detecting platform inconsistencies early by simulating interactions and allows for troubleshooting front-end defects. Whether conducting manual or automated testing via its Selenium portal and API, it proves invaluable for assessing JavaScript performance and resolving browser-specific issues in web and mobile applications. The service is appreciated for responsive support and adaptation to feature requests, though it seeks enhancements in load times and UI streamlining.

What are some key features of CrossBrowserTesting?

Live Testing: Conduct live tests to verify functionality across browsers and devices.
Screenshot Functionality: Quickly capture and share page results with team members.
Record and Replay: Enhance test automation capabilities with this functionality.
Real Device Access: Perform tests on real devices under actual conditions.
Updated TLS Settings: Run tests with the latest security configurations.

What benefits should users seek in CrossBrowserTesting reviews?

Responsiveness: Notice how support teams address user inquiries and feature needs.
Flexibility: Observe flexibility in adding requested features for seamless testing.
Device Diversity: Consider the range of browser and device combinations offered.

In industries like e-commerce and SaaS platforms, CrossBrowserTesting is instrumental in providing rigorous testing, allowing companies to enhance user experiences by identifying cross-platform issues. It supports ensuring that applications perform effectively across devices and browsers, which is vital for customer retention and satisfaction.

SmartBear

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.