Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers high ROI by saving time and costs, enhancing compliance, and preventing ransomware disruptions.
Sentiment score
3.5
Users experienced a 30% return with Kaspersky EDR Optimum, valuing enhanced security and favorable pricing despite measurement challenges.
Without this type of solution, work becomes hampered and files become inaccessible.
I have observed value for money from Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.1
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection's customer service is praised for fast, effective support, albeit with occasional delays.
Sentiment score
5.1
Kaspersky support is generally good with multilingual assistance, but response times vary, with users often using other support sources.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
Compared to other solution providers, the responses are not very clear when we need support.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection efficiently scales from small to large enterprises, though larger entities may face some implementation challenges.
Sentiment score
7.9
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is praised for scalability, efficient integration, and straightforward licensing adjustments despite minor speed issues.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is scalable for my environment.
It is very easy for me to scale.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is praised for stability, with 95-97% reliability, though older devices may perform slower.
Sentiment score
7.8
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection is praised for stability and reliability, though concerns exist about zero-day attack vulnerabilities.
When deploying on old PCs, servers, or laptops, optimal performance cannot be expected.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection requires enhanced communication, better support, lower costs, and improvements in infrastructure, documentation, and market presence.
Kaspersky EDR Optimum needs better internet protection, UI, integration, scalability, pricing, support, and simplified installation for improved user experience.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
The main areas for improvement are support responsiveness and the additional enhancement with the DLP integration.
The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions.
SonicWall can integrate with other products such as Sophos, SentinelOne, and several others, but not with Kaspersky.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
 

Setup Cost

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers cost-effective, flexible licensing, appealing to enterprises with competitive pricing and partner discounts.
Kaspersky EDR Optimum offers cost-effective, subscription-based licensing, appealing to budget-conscious companies, praised for quality and threat intelligence.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
 

Valuable Features

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels in ransomware protection, AI threat detection, ease of use, and extensive integrations.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers comprehensive automated threat response, malware detection, and seamless SIEM integration for enhanced security management.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
If anything happens or any suspicious activities are detected, an alert is generated, allowing for quick response.
Threat Response Automation in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is quite effective for enhancing security.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
In the past month, we encountered an unknown type of malware, but the behavior was sufficient for Kaspersky to isolate the network based on this behavior, which proved very efficient.
 

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
38th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
31st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum0.9%
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection0.4%
Other98.7%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

MehulSharma - PeerSpot reviewer
A cloud solution for endpoint security with DLP
We shared a datasheet with the customer. The customer mentioned that MDM or DLP is included in the product, but she cannot utilize these features in AP Protection, even though they are mentioned in the datasheet. This creates an issue recommending the product to the customer since she cannot use these features. Therefore, when updating your datasheet, clarifying which features apply to the customer's product use is crucial. This clarity is beneficial for both parties. I provide the solution on-premises, but we conduct the POC on the Azure platform. Additionally, we are partners with both Microsoft and AWS. This enables us to offer the AWS and Azure platforms, whichever the customer prefers. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Rizki Arya Indracahya - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient integration and log monitoring enhances security operations
The central management needs improvement. The ease of use for updating and managing through the web console is difficult and lacks features. Integration with Mobile Device Management is not good, and controlling client update times can become problematic. If there is a network issue during an update, it can create junk files on the system, filling up disk space.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
There are not many disadvantages, but they need to do some work on DLP integration. Support could be improved. Sometimes it is difficult to find exact solutions, and people occasionally get stuck, ...
What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
The product's most valuable feature is the flexibility of installation with the console and a simple administration strategy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market. I do not know the exact cost of the license per endpoint or annually.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
The reporting system is good, but it can be quite tricky for customers to get the reports. Unfortunately, Kaspersky UI is something they need to work upon. It's not as simplistic or user-friendly a...
 

Also Known As

Comodo AEP
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.