Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are leading cybersecurity products. While Kaspersky receives praise for its superior feature set, Comodo often has more favorable pricing and support reviews. Users feel Kaspersky's features justify its higher price.
Features: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is noted for its containment technology, automatic file analysis, and competitive pricing. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is praised for its threat intelligence, comprehensive reporting, and broader range of advanced features.
Room for Improvement: Users of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection desire better integration with third-party tools, a more intuitive management console, and regular updates. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum users seek enhancements in reducing false positives, improving system performance, and expect regular optimizations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is valued for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is sometimes seen as more complex to deploy but has robust support that assists throughout the deployment phase. Both products have strong customer service, but Comodo's simpler installation process gives it an edge.
Pricing and ROI: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is often highlighted for its competitive pricing and transparent cost structure. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum may have higher upfront costs but is regarded as delivering strong ROI due to its extensive feature set. Users generally view Kaspersky as providing better long-term value despite higher initial expenses.
Without this type of solution, work becomes hampered and files become inaccessible.
I have observed value for money from Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
Compared to other solution providers, the responses are not very clear when we need support.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
For technical support, Kaspersky provides two kinds: purchased support for real-time assistance and normal support during working hours.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum can expand from Endpoint Detection and Response to Extended Detection and Response and then threat intelligence solutions.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
When deploying on old PCs, servers, or laptops, optimal performance cannot be expected.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
I would rate stability for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum as nine; it is pretty stable, a very good, stable product.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
The main areas for improvement are support responsiveness and the additional enhancement with the DLP integration.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions.
SonicWall can integrate with other products such as Sophos, SentinelOne, and several others, but not with Kaspersky.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
If anything happens or any suspicious activities are detected, an alert is generated, allowing for quick response.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
Threat Response Automation in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is quite effective for enhancing security.
In the past month, we encountered an unknown type of malware, but the behavior was sufficient for Kaspersky to isolate the network based on this behavior, which proved very efficient.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum | 0.9% |
| Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection | 0.6% |
| Other | 98.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
