Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 14, 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive and integrated management capabilities and extensive feature suite.
Features: Trellix Endpoint Security offers threat prevention, firewall, and web control, all managed from a single console which centralizes management and boosts efficiency. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection focuses on strong auto-containment and zero-day threat monitoring, with an emphasis on ransomware protection and remote management, providing a tailored edge for businesses prioritizing these areas.
Room for Improvement: Trellix users indicate a need for better resource consumption, improved integration capabilities, enhanced technical support, and faster deployment response times. For Comodo, users suggest improvements in agent performance, detailed reporting feedback, enhanced log details, and more efficient quarantine processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers flexible deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, beneficial for large enterprises. However, customer service receives mixed reviews, with some delays reported post-merger with FireEye. Comodo focuses on cloud deployments, making it convenient for cloud-focused companies. Its support is highly praised for quick issue resolution, though Linux support may have occasional gaps.
Pricing and ROI: Trellix, positioned as mid-range in pricing, is appreciated for its extensive features and customization options suitable for large enterprises, although some note an increase in costs annually. Its licensing flexibility contributes positively to ROI. Comodo is viewed as cost-effective with competitively lower pricing appealing to small and medium-sized businesses. Its straightforward pricing structure enhances ROI, effectively balancing comprehensive security with cost considerations.
