Top 10 Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

17 reviews
81% willing to recommend

Top Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat prevention with default-deny technology and built-in auto containment, ensuring comprehensive security and minimal false positives for businesses seeking reliable and proactive defense against cyber threats.

Xcitium Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Xcitium, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced EDR and AI-driven threat detection, ideal for environments needing detailed forensic capabilities. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, with its sandboxing and cost-effectiveness, is attractive for budget-conscious enterprises needing robust security.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a more complex pricing structure. CrowdStrike's simplicity contrasts with Comodo's detailed tiered options.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers competitive pricing and strong support, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is favored for comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless integration with Microsoft products, ideal for larger organizations seeking a robust security infrastructure.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection has a lower initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs a higher setup expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection has a lower initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs a higher setup expense.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has robust AI-driven threat detection and automated response capabilities. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels with containment technology and auto-sandboxing. SentinelOne offers seamless deployment and integration, while Comodo is more affordable and focuses on prevention and containment.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection. The comparison shows significant differences in pricing, with SentinelOne being more expensive upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR offers advanced analytics and AI-based threat detection, making it ideal for comprehensive threat detection and response. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels with its auto-containment technology and strong zero-day malware protection, providing proactive malware prevention at a cost-effective price point.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup.

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient is valued for its comprehensive security features and affordability, with straightforward deployment and responsive service. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels in feature richness and advanced protection, offering strong ROI despite higher costs but presents a steeper learning curve and mixed customer service feedback.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is minimal, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection requires a higher upfront investment. FortiClient offers a cost-effective solution, contrasting with Comodo's premium-priced setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security excels in centralized management with features like antivirus and encryption. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection focuses on containment technology for ransomware protection. Trellix's resource utilization needs improvement, while Comodo's user interface could be more intuitive for IT professionals.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost differs from Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection with its customized pricing structure, while Comodo offers a more straightforward upfront cost, providing options based on user demands and deployment scale.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security excels in malware protection and ease of deployment, making it a robust choice for comprehensive security features. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers advanced threat prevention and cost-effectiveness, attracting users focused on sophisticated endpoint management and cost-efficient solutions.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup option.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business

4.0 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business

4.0 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business attracts buyers with robust antivirus capabilities, ease of use, and efficient customer support. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers comprehensive protection, including containment technology and a security operations center, though users note room for improvement in customer service responsiveness.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a higher setup cost, whereas Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a lower setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a higher setup cost, whereas Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a lower setup cost.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection and seamless integration. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection provides a comprehensive security suite with robust antivirus and firewall features. Trend Vision One is affordable with better ROI, while Comodo's extensive features justify its higher price.

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a more affordable initial implementation cost than Trend Vision One Endpoint Security.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint integrates features like Zero Phishing Protection and Anti-Ransomware with its ecosystem, enhancing threat intelligence. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection emphasizes sandboxing and AI for dynamic threat containment, making it appealing for firms prioritizing isolation and cost-effective solutions.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony Endpoint typically involves a higher setup cost but offers robust security features, whereas Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection provides a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking essential protection.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 6 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Threat Intelligence Platforms