We performed a comparison between Citrix Endpoint Management and ManageEngine Endpoint Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management)."It is a stable solution."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"There are so many features, but Windows Autopilot is one of the features that are very valuable for most customers."
"The solution has reduced the risk of security breaches by 30%."
"The ability to manage devices with different sets of policies is most valuable."
"The mobile application management, MAM, is the most useful aspect of the solution."
"The one feature we find most useful is the Mobile Application Manager. There are two types, we have the complete MDM and the Mobile Application Manager(MAM). We don't give our users phones, it is their own personal phone, and we need to allow them to have access to the company detail on their phone. We need to create a balance between their own personal data and the company data. We deploy the Mobile Application Manager for them so that we won't be able to interfere with their own personal data."
"...Intune itself integrates with that entire Microsoft ecosystem. As an individual product itself, it's okay. It holds up. But when you start saying "I've bought this as part of a wider solution, as a company we are going Microsoft throughout," then it makes more sense to have Microsoft Intune... so you have that single dashboard."
"The product is capable of acting in many different ways to help secure architecture."
"We have seen improvements in compliance management on the devices."
"A valuable feature of Citrix Endpoint Management is that it's stable. The stability is not a challenge among the move to the cloud."
"ShareFile, in particular, is valuable with its ease of sharing, and the best category security that is in the hands of users."
"The MAM applications of the product are great."
"The product works perfectly for patch management and software deployments."
"The patch manager is good, and it's easy to use."
"The solution is time-saving and resource-saving."
"Page management and ADA integrations are the most valuable features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central."
"The dashboard has been very useful."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The centralized control of all of our Windows hardware that this solution offers has been most valuable to our organization."
"Has good functionality and is user-friendly."
"The biggest problem we ever have is when something goes out of date after 30 days when nobody has logged into it. We do have a problem trying to get those back online. We've been working with Microsoft to resolve that problem, but that's been the only issue that we've had in the last few years."
"Having a dedicated configuration server that assists in modifying the configuration service, and creating personalized structures, interfaces, and web services could enhance usability."
"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."
"The feature that allows us to import the business application from the configuration manager to Intune is not very good at this time."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"The reporting is subpar. That's the only issue we have with Intune. We use another solution for that purpose."
"Reporting and troubleshooting for the application deployment could be better. It's very difficult to understand."
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"The tool’s battery usage was high."
"Citrix needs to improve the architecture. They also need to strengthen the application integration. They keep referring to some things to be required as security, and they keep selling the next level and on-premise separately. They should give the customer the opportunity to decide whether they want to use the next level on-premise or on-cloud, but they should not charge additional fees if the customer wants to deploy the next level on-premise because the customer is already being charged as the end user. They should allow next level on-premise optimization without any additional charges."
"Requires integrating with ABM before enabling some of the features."
"Support for inventory management of Apple devices should be added."
"I would like to see them include the ability to find out the network usage but I believe that might be a feature of it already."
"I would like to see them come out with a SaaS version of the product in the future."
"The MDM feature isn't very good. It doesn't support Amazon vendors."
"We are looking for a complete solution for patch management with central management and the cloud which ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not provide."
"The team I've currently got is not using it particularly well, due to the fact that they don't know how to use it particularly well. They've not done any training and so on."
"I would like to have the option to install the agent remotely."
"I would like to see more click to complete actions such as - USB lockdown for Mac, the ability to check AV compliance on servers, bit locker controls, printer tracking or print page tracking, self-help for self-healing like "BMC my IT" and more options in the self-service menu other than just software - maybe add integration in ADSelfService at the self-service menu."
"The solution lacks some configuration."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix Endpoint Management is ranked 7th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 1 review while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 3rd in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 22 reviews. Citrix Endpoint Management is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Citrix Endpoint Management writes "A scalable solution that is easy to deploy and improves compliance management of devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes " Patch and upgrade many devices simultaneously in a DevSecOps pipeline which is effective but demanding on resources". Citrix Endpoint Management is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, CyberArk Identity, MOBI, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and Ivanti Endpoint Manager, whereas ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) vendors.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.