ControlUp and Cisco Intersight compete in IT infrastructure management. ControlUp has the advantage in real-time monitoring and insights, while Cisco Intersight offers superior manageability with strong cloud integration.
Features: ControlUp provides real-time monitoring, automation tools, and detailed system performance insights. Its integrations offer powerful analytics and a clear ROI. Cisco Intersight offers comprehensive cloud integration and workflow automation, supporting diverse environments like Kubernetes.
Room for Improvement: ControlUp could improve system integration, network monitoring, and alert systems. Enhancing reporting and UI updates are recommended. Cisco Intersight needs better hybrid cloud management, integration with additional tools, and more advanced automation capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ControlUp offers easy deployment and stable performance, with responsive customer service. Cisco Intersight is more complex, requiring time for adaptation. While helpful, its customer service may be less responsive initially.
Pricing and ROI: ControlUp is cost-effective, providing ROI through automation, though some report hidden charges. It varies with licenses. Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing with straightforward licensing, offering robust features despite complexity.
It simplifies the onboarding of new hardware, reducing time spent on manual installations and configurations.
This is having a 24/7 junior admin who's really smart, always there, always doing work, but you have to consume his work.
Basically, what we were targeting is the response time of the virtual environment.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
Cisco technical support is helpful.
Cisco provides better support than anyone else.
I was quite happy to work with ControlUp because the support is excellent.
Basically, if I could take everything that you do, put it in a tool, and hand you that tool so you don't have to repeat your efforts, then you would be able to make good use of it.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten due to its capability to manage multiple domains and automate service requests.
Cisco Intersight is scalable enough for our needs, allowing management in a multi-environment setup and working remotely while deploying servers.
It scales very well; you just have to tell it what you're doing and size it for what you're asking.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
It is always accessible online, secure, and allows access from any location, following strict authentication standards.
There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment.
It would be great to have a chat session mode AI so that when I am on standby and encountering issues, I could engage with it, much like ChatGPT.
When registering our devices and servers using tokens, auto-detection could make it easier by automatically identifying resources and adding them to the platform.
There is area for improvement, maybe in the reporting.
Cisco Intersight's license cost is very high compared to AWS and Azure solutions, which have lower initiation costs.
The pricing is fair and reasonable, particularly for enterprises.
The pricing mechanism sounds fair.
It is expensive.
It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure.
It also provides predictive analysis, predicting data leaks and making it easy to scale up servers remotely without requiring physical interference.
This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool, rather than direct cost savings.
Everything works exactly the way it's meant to, a dream come true for anyone who's administering systems because it gives you all the information that you want and all the actions you want to take, all in one place.
There are a lot of counters and monitors you can implement that will help you detect problems before they happen.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Intersight | 1.6% |
| ControlUp | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.
ControlUp is a digital experience monitoring management platform that makes it possible for IT teams to deliver a work-from-anywhere experience for employees. The solution makes fixing and preventing issues easy, enabling IT teams to make smarter decisions. It also provides monitoring performance, availability, and useful productivity metrics.
The ControlUp platform supports:
ControlUp Features
ControlUp has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
ControlUp Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing ControlUp. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the ControlUp solution.
A Chair, IEEE Consumer Technology Society - Dallas,Texas, USA at a non-profit says, “In terms of the public cloud, ControlUp's features make us feel very secure. Security, uptime, and reduced capital expenditures are the main reasons we use ControlUp. So basically, the money that we consume is based on the amount of time we are using a service. ControlUp offers a return-on-investment type of approach that helps us.”
A VP Virtualisation and Citrix Engineer at BlackRock mentions, “Solve is quickly becoming one of the most-used features. Its interface allows us to connect to all 54,000 monitored endpoints in real-time. The script-based actions have allowed us to extend the core reporting capabilities. Combined with the triggers, we have been growing their usage to fix things before they become an issue. Lastly, the controller view allows us to compare the configurations of settings side-by-side which is extremely helpful when tracking down the RCA of an issue.”
A Senior Citrix Remote Access Engineer at Rabobank comments, “The high-level view of the estate coupled with powerful administration tools has been great. We can see real-time performance and trends and can create triggers for common issues with associated scripts that can automate a lot of the previous manual remediation steps.”
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
