"The product has good integration."
"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."
"I like Intersight because of the integration with HashiCorp, Kubernetes, and each cloud because Intersight is the IO module."
"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."
"Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement."
"When new features are added, the service becomes full of bugs."
"The unique problem with Cisco Intersight is that it's not supporting some players."
"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."
Cisco Intersight is ranked 9th in Cloud Management with 3 reviews while Cisco UCS Director is ranked 14th in Cloud Management with 1 review. Cisco Intersight is rated 8.0, while Cisco UCS Director is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Intersight writes "Scalable and easy to set up portfolio of services; good for remote device management and other functions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco UCS Director writes "Integrates well, stable, and responsive technical support". Cisco Intersight is most compared with Cisco UCS Manager, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), HPE OneView, VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) and Cisco CloudCenter, whereas Cisco UCS Director is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), vCloud Director, VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), Cisco CloudCenter and SaltStack.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
