Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Intersight based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and Splunk AppDynamics.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Datadog excels with extensive integrations, advanced cloud features, and seamless monitoring setup, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive cloud solutions. In comparison, Cisco Intersight offers strong Cisco product integration and insightful data center management, suiting environments focused on Cisco technologies and workflow automation.
Zabbix offers a flexible, cost-effective open-source monitoring solution appealing for its wide range of device compatibility. In comparison, Cisco Intersight is preferred for robust cloud integration, making it ideal for hybrid environments seeking comprehensive data center visibility.
Splunk AppDynamics offers robust application performance monitoring and comprehensive transactional analysis. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in integration for data management and hybrid cloud optimization, making it ideal for broader infrastructure environments while Splunk AppDynamics focuses on application-specific needs.
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Intersight, making it more expensive to implement initially, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Intersight, making it more expensive to implement initially, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
IBM Turbonomic excels in automation and capacity planning, with notable strengths in VM rightsizing and environmental optimization. In comparison, Cisco Intersight effectively integrates with hybrid clouds, offering robust automation and inventory management, targeting modern infrastructures with significant cloud integration.
IBM Turbonomic's setup cost is competitive, offering predictable pricing, while Cisco Intersight has a more flexible cost structure with potential for higher initial expenses. The main differences lie in pricing models and anticipated financial commitment upfront.
IBM Turbonomic's setup cost is competitive, offering predictable pricing, while Cisco Intersight has a more flexible cost structure with potential for higher initial expenses. The main differences lie in pricing models and anticipated financial commitment upfront.
SolarWinds NPM offers customizable alerts and strong reporting, appealing to enterprises with significant network monitoring needs. In comparison, Cisco Intersight focuses on cloud integration, making it a choice for those prioritizing hybrid cloud management and data center automation.
PRTG Network Monitor offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness with rapid deployment, attractive to those needing immediate solutions. In comparison, Cisco Intersight suits environments requiring robust hybrid management and cloud integration but may have higher initial costs offset by its extensive features.
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Cisco Intersight involves more complex configuration with potentially higher expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Cisco Intersight involves more complex configuration with potentially higher expenses.
VMware Aria Automation offers customizable automation for managing complex infrastructures. In comparison, Cisco Intersight focuses on seamless platform integration and interactive monitoring. VMware's strength lies in multi-vendor personalization, while Cisco excels in supporting companies invested in Cisco hardware with effective monitoring.
VMware Aria Automation offers a competitive setup cost, while Cisco Intersight presents a slightly higher financial entry point, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
VMware Aria Automation offers a competitive setup cost, while Cisco Intersight presents a slightly higher financial entry point, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Cisco Intersight offers cost-effective infrastructure management and automation, attracting budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides superior incident and event management, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive service-oriented IT solutions, despite its higher upfront cost.
Cisco Intersight offers a competitive setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management presents a higher initial expense, emphasizing a distinction in cost-effectiveness between the two solutions.
Cisco Intersight offers a competitive setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management presents a higher initial expense, emphasizing a distinction in cost-effectiveness between the two solutions.
LogicMonitor provides extensive customization and real-time monitoring features suitable for those seeking flexible alerting capabilities. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in integration within data centers and hybrid environments, offering robust orchestration for diverse integrations like Kubernetes and cloud solutions.
Nagios Core offers extensive monitoring and customization, appealing to those seeking open-source flexibility. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in cloud integration with comprehensive management for hybrid environments. Nagios is cost-effective and scalable, while Intersight provides advanced analytics for enterprises needing robust cloud solutions.
Nagios Core offers a cost-effective setup ideal for those seeking an affordable solution, while Cisco Intersight involves higher initial costs reflecting its advanced features and infrastructure capabilities.
Nagios Core offers a cost-effective setup ideal for those seeking an affordable solution, while Cisco Intersight involves higher initial costs reflecting its advanced features and infrastructure capabilities.
Centreon is ideal for scalable infrastructure monitoring and BI reports with open-source benefits, while Cisco Intersight excels in hybrid cloud management. In comparison, Centreon's cost-effective solutions provide substantial ROI, whereas Cisco Intersight offers robust analytics and integration for diverse environments.
Centreon users report minimal setup costs, while Cisco Intersight's initial setup is described as more expensive. This cost discrepancy highlights significant budget considerations between the two solutions.
Centreon users report minimal setup costs, while Cisco Intersight's initial setup is described as more expensive. This cost discrepancy highlights significant budget considerations between the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration and rapid log searching, benefiting tech buyers seeking advanced analytics. In comparison, Cisco Intersight offers strong hybrid cloud management, appealing to those focused on integration and data center visibility.
OpsRamp is attractive for its competitive pricing and efficient support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations through its AI-driven incident management. In comparison, Cisco Intersight offers advanced automation and scalability, drawing buyers seeking robust features despite the higher cost.
OpsRamp has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Intersight, making it a budget-friendly option. Cisco Intersight, with its higher setup costs, may offer more advanced features appealing to a different segment of users.
OpsRamp has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Intersight, making it a budget-friendly option. Cisco Intersight, with its higher setup costs, may offer more advanced features appealing to a different segment of users.
Cisco Intersight has notably lower setup costs compared to Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), which makes Cisco Intersight a more budget-friendly option. However, Nutanix Cloud Manager may offer additional features justifying its higher initial setup cost.
Cisco Intersight has notably lower setup costs compared to Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), which makes Cisco Intersight a more budget-friendly option. However, Nutanix Cloud Manager may offer additional features justifying its higher initial setup cost.
BMC TrueSight Operations Management offers comprehensive event management and policy features suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Cisco Intersight provides easier integration with cloud settings and competitive pricing, appealing to those seeking flexibility and budget-friendly solutions.
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more flexible pricing model catering to varying budgets.
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more flexible pricing model catering to varying budgets.
VMware Cloud Director excels in robust cloud services and security features, appealing with its end-to-end management and extensibility. In comparison, Cisco Intersight provides superior manageability and integration with cloud infrastructures, offering advanced workflow automation and infrastructure optimization for cohesive platform integration.
Cisco Intersight excels in integration capabilities with Cisco hardware, offering seamless deployment and reliable customer support. In comparison, Morpheus has a comprehensive feature set, ideal for multi-cloud environments with competitive pricing, though requiring a more complex initial configuration for deployment flexibility.
Cisco Intersight has recognized challenges in setup costs, whereas Morpheus is noted for offering a more straightforward setup process with lower costs.
Cisco Intersight has recognized challenges in setup costs, whereas Morpheus is noted for offering a more straightforward setup process with lower costs.
HPE OneView offers centralized management and comprehensive control over hardware infrastructure. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in cloud integration and automation across hybrid environments. Both emphasize operational efficiencies and cost-effectiveness, addressing different priorities for tech buyers.
HPE OneView displays lower setup costs compared to Cisco Intersight, providing a cost-effective entry for businesses. Cisco Intersight's setup is more costly, reflecting its advanced cloud-based capabilities.
HPE OneView displays lower setup costs compared to Cisco Intersight, providing a cost-effective entry for businesses. Cisco Intersight's setup is more costly, reflecting its advanced cloud-based capabilities.
vRealize Network Insight offers network visualization and microsegmentation, ideal for simplifying NSX deployments. In comparison, Cisco Intersight facilitates cloud and hybrid management through orchestration tools, appealing to those managing comprehensive data centers, necessitating different approaches to integration and deployment.
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth attracts buyers with its straightforward pricing and strong financial management features. In comparison, Cisco Intersight appeals through its rich feature set focused on infrastructure automation, ideal for those seeking deeper integration and advanced automation in complex IT environments.
Dell CloudIQ is a cost-effective choice praised for excellent support and ease of deployment. In comparison, Cisco Intersight attracts those needing advanced automation and integration. Dell CloudIQ simplifies management, while Cisco Intersight offers robust features for complex environments, justifying higher costs.
Cisco Intersight emphasizes automation and efficiency, appealing to those seeking advanced analytics and streamlined operations. In comparison, FortiMonitor targets security-focused buyers with its strong real-time visibility and threat detection, providing flexible deployment options for varied infrastructure requirements.
OP5 Monitor offers strong network monitoring and alerting with simple deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in feature richness and scalability with advanced automation and integrations, appealing to those needing sophisticated tools and extensive support for cloud-based infrastructure management.
Cisco Intersight excels in integration and remote management, providing seamless automation for Cisco hardware. In comparison, Grafana Enterprise Stack offers advanced, customizable visualization tools for diverse data sources, catering to organizations requiring detailed data monitoring and analytics alongside flexible deployment options.
Cisco Intersight often incurs higher setup costs compared to Grafana Enterprise Stack, which offers competitive pricing. This cost difference highlights Grafana's potential for budget-conscious users while Cisco's robust features may justify the expense for some organizations.
Cisco Intersight often incurs higher setup costs compared to Grafana Enterprise Stack, which offers competitive pricing. This cost difference highlights Grafana's potential for budget-conscious users while Cisco's robust features may justify the expense for some organizations.
XClarity Orchestrator provides a single interface to monitor and manage all devices (including chassis, servers, switches, and storage) that are managed through an existing resource manager.
HPE Greenlake For Compute Ops Management offers streamlined infrastructure management, valuable for businesses seeking agility and control. Users appreciate its scalability and customization. There's room for improvement in integration capabilities and documentation clarity, enabling better user adaptation and smoother onboarding processes.
