HPE OneView and Cisco Intersight compete in the field of infrastructure management solutions. Cisco Intersight appears to have the upper hand due to its superior cloud integration and hybrid cloud management capabilities.
Features: HPE OneView is recognized for its efficient automation, seamless infrastructure management, and centralized monitoring. It provides substantial time savings with a single dashboard for comprehensive management of HPE environments, especially valued for controlling blades and server health. Cisco Intersight stands out with strong cloud integration and workflow automation. It offers a unified management platform across hybrid clouds, valued for third-party integration and analytics capabilities.
Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could improve with better integration for non-HPE products and advanced alert management. Enhancing feature customization and support for older equipment is suggested. Cisco Intersight can benefit from improved hybrid cloud management and expanded automation features. Better third-party tool integration and simpler usability are also areas for enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView is deployed on-premises, focusing on infrastructure-specific solutions, with mixed reviews on technical support responsiveness and expertise. Cisco Intersight supports deployments across on-premises, public, and hybrid clouds. It is praised for its ease of deployment and reliable customer service, providing efficient assistance during setup and troubleshooting.
Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView is viewed as cost-effective for deep HPE ecosystem users, though slightly expensive to some. It shows clear ROI in time and configuration efficiency. Cisco Intersight is competitively priced, offering a free license for basic monitoring, striking a balance in cost and functionality, especially appealing for extended cloud capabilities. Both solutions show ROI in reducing configuration efforts despite differing in pricing models.
It simplifies the onboarding of new hardware, reducing time spent on manual installations and configurations.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
Cisco technical support is helpful.
Cisco provides better support than anyone else.
The customer service and support have been responsive.
The technical support for HPE OneView rates as an 8 on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is the worst and 10 is the best.
I would give the quality of HPE OneView's technical support an eight out of ten rating, indicating good customer service and support in my opinion.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten due to its capability to manage multiple domains and automate service requests.
Cisco Intersight is scalable enough for our needs, allowing management in a multi-environment setup and working remotely while deploying servers.
HPE OneView is highly scalable, especially useful for organizations with large infrastructures.
HPE OneView is a scalable solution since you can integrate any number of servers based on your license.
Scalability is fine as we can add Synergy frames and extend many frames as needed.
It is always accessible online, secure, and allows access from any location, following strict authentication standards.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
The stability of the blades is concerning; we have frequent issues with blades having memory or power issues.
HPE OneView is a stable solution that works efficiently.
It supports unified monitoring effectively but may have areas for enhancement.
When registering our devices and servers using tokens, auto-detection could make it easier by automatically identifying resources and adding them to the platform.
There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment.
It would be great to have a chat session mode AI so that when I am on standby and encountering issues, I could engage with it, much like ChatGPT.
The upgrade process is lengthy, requiring careful planning as we cannot match ESXi versions without aligning OneView first, leading to delays.
From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.
I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive.
The pricing is fair and reasonable, particularly for enterprises.
Cisco Intersight's license cost is very high compared to AWS and Azure solutions, which have lower initiation costs.
The pricing mechanism sounds fair.
Customers need to pay a substantial amount for the licenses, especially when monitoring a large number of servers and storages.
Our main concern is managing expenses related to the VMware licensing model which affects blade usage.
This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool, rather than direct cost savings.
It also provides predictive analysis, predicting data leaks and making it easy to scale up servers remotely without requiring physical interference.
It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure.
I can monitor everything in one view, which has significantly improved operational efficiency for us.
There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.
We upgrade OneView first, then the entire hardware, ensuring compatibility before doing ESXi upgrades.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Intersight | 1.7% |
| HPE OneView | 1.4% |
| Other | 96.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.
HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.
HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
