Bonita vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Bonitasoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bonitasoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3. Bonitasoft holds a 3.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,094 Views
2,599 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 16 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

597 Views
525 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bonita

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and Bonita operate in the content management and business process management categories, respectively. Bonita appears to have an advantage due to its extensive process automation capabilities and larger feature set.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides seamless integration with SharePoint, robust document management, and easy workflow creation for content security and approvals. Bonita supports comprehensive process modeling, includes a flexible user interface, and offers powerful integration options with existing systems, making it ideal for complex workflows.

Room for Improvement: OpenText 360 could improve in offering a broader feature set to match wider process automation needs. Enhancements in customization options and integration with non-Microsoft platforms could also benefit users. Bonita requires streamlining initial configuration processes and expanding native support for non-web-based environments. Improving ease of use for non-technical users and optimizing integration with certain proprietary systems could enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 simplifies deployment within Microsoft ecosystems and supports a familiar setup. Bonita demands more initial configuration but provides extensive guidance and support with detailed tutorials, making it suitable for complex deployments requiring customization.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 offers competitive pricing for SharePoint users, promising an attractive ROI through seamless content management within Microsoft environments. Bonita may involve higher initial setup costs, yet it often results in higher ROI from improved process efficiencies and reduced operational redundancies.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,490 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (11th), Process Automation (15th)

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bonita is 3.5%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Ravi Krishnan S

Head - Financial Reporting and Taxation at TVS Capital Funds

Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive

OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is easy to use."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Development of forms and flows."

"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."

More Bonita pros

"Overall, I would rate OpenText 360 for SharePoint as ten."

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

Cons

"Installation could be made easier."

"There could be an improvement in IoT connectivity."

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."

More Bonita cons

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"It has a reasonable price."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 54% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 15% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

July 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

June 2025

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

July 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.