Bonita vs Flowable comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Bonitasoft and Flowable are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #29, while Flowable is ranked #25. Bonitasoft holds a 2.0% mindshare in PA, compared to Flowable’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Flowable users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

6,658 Views
3,262 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Flowable

Read 1 Flowable review

3,772 Views
3,395 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bonita

Flowable

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bonita and Flowable based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, PagerDuty and others in Process Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,938 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Process Automation

29th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (16th), Business Process Management (BPM) (26th)

Flowable

Ranking in Process Automation

25th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bonita is 2.0%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flowable is 2.1%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Flowable	2.1%
Bonita	2.0%
Other	95.9%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Guermazi

Technical Director / Project Manager at I-way

The user interface is easy to use, and the product performs well, but the dashboard and the monitoring features are limited

We use the product to design workflows. We model and install them on the server. We use the Community edition The modeling features are easy. The performance of the tool is good. The user interface is easy to use. I have used the product for complex processes and sub-processes successfully. The…

Read full review

Simon Greener

Solutions Architect at Cohga Pty Ltd

Helps to control the workflow and business process components of customers' operations but OSGi integration can be challenging

I'd rate my experience with the initial setup of Flowable at about a three out of ten, but for our developers, it's probably closer to a six. I found it challenging due to the complexity of the user and help documents and the fact that much of the Flowable documentation and tutorials are focused on cloud-based implementations. Since we're primarily interested in basic components like BPMN models and form design, which aren't included in the product, the learning process was more difficult for me. In contrast, our developers are more comfortable diving into the code and technology stack, which allows them to be more proactive in their approach. The deployment took three months to complete. We're still in the deployment process. Our main challenge is integrating the Flowable process engine into our product, which uses OSGi. This has led to complexity in managing the Java versions and dependencies, as the tool has around 150 Java files. We could have chosen to interact with Flowable via a Docker container and the REST API, which would have isolated the OSGi Java dependencies, but we decided to integrate it directly. This has required resolving Java version control issues and upgrades, leading to various development challenges that must be addressed. It is a learning process for all of us. As an integrated solutions architect, I would have probably opted for the Docker route rather than the direct OSGi integration chosen by the developers. However, since they went with the OSGi integration, it's taking us longer to complete the deployment. Currently, we have one full-time developer dedicated to deployment, along with one part-time developer, and my involvement at about a quarter of my time. So, we have about two people working on deployment. As for maintenance, we're not entirely sure yet. Given our direct OSGi integration choice instead of Docker and REST, maintenance may be more challenging. However, we'll have a clearer picture once deployment is complete.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."

"The Connector implementation is a great addition to an out-of-box solution providing robust features for the developer to build hassle-free integrations."

"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."

"The solution is easy to use."

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

"Of the three BPM vendors I evaluated, Bonita was the best in creating forms, ease of customization of forms, and versatility of supported platforms, and it is the only BPM platform that I've seen so far that allows for versioning of artifacts."

"Bonita BPM is simple and fast; it is very easy to install and use."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

More Bonita pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the process engine. It allows us to define BPM-based workflows, deploy them into our process engine, and interact with them within our product."

Cons

"That said, creating custom connectors for 3rd party applications and APIs is still a challenging task."

"BPMN 2.0 notations are not all supported, would love to see them all coming in (e.g. complex gateway)."

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"There is a considerable learning curve."

"The support is mandatory to access all features (Subscription), maybe they can have a different business model."

"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."

"The community edition has limited module functionality."

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

More Bonita cons

"In my opinion, areas of improvement for Flowable include the management and creation of forms within the open-source components and the documentation and examples provided. While the cloud-based Flowable implementation with no-code features is attractive, we prefer more control over integration, especially since we deploy our product onto AWS. We also want to avoid additional licensing fees for Flowable runtime user components on top of our software development and implementation charges."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"Since the tool is open-source, we don't have to pay anything for it. It's free to download and use, which is great for us. If Flowable hadn't been available as open source and required a license fee for us to integrate it into our product, we might not have chosen it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

AuraQuantic vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Camunda vs Flowable

Compared 23% of the time

Temporal vs Flowable

Compared 17% of the time

n8n vs Flowable

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs Flowable

Compared 9% of the time

Appian vs Flowable

Compared 3% of the time

More Flowable Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

September 2026

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

August 2026

Download Flowable product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

No data available

Overview

Bonita offers a low-code platform with user-friendly implementation, drag-and-drop capabilities, and robust connectors, making it suitable for integration, form customization, and process modeling. Its compatibility with multiple platforms supports workflow management.

Bonita stands out for its rapid cycle times, comprehensive documentation, and extensive integration capabilities. Its flexible UI supports Java modules and offers valuable process modeling and application development features. Users find it particularly efficient for business process management and workflow automation, allowing them to design, develop, and deploy processes seamlessly while leveraging its open-source nature. Despite these strengths, improvements in code flexibility, debugging, and mobile version access can enhance its performance. Better BPM and IoT connectivity, coupled with a refined cloud billing model, could add further value.

What are Bonita's most important features?

Drag-and-drop capabilities: Simplify process modeling and design.
Robust connectors: Facilitate smooth integration with third-party systems.
Flexible UI: Allows easy form customization and adaptability.
Comprehensive documentation: Supports efficient implementation and learning.
Multi-platform compatibility: Enhances flexibility by supporting diverse environments.
Open-source nature: Encourages customization and community-driven enhancements.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of integration: Simplifies connecting with existing systems.
Accelerated development: Streamlines the application development cycle.
Workflow automation: Enhances operational efficiency and process management.
Customizability: Allows tailored solutions to meet specific needs.

Bonita is frequently implemented across sectors like manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and finance for web application creation, testing, and user access management. Organizations utilize it in development and pre-production environments as well as educational settings for course automation and validation, adapting its features to meet sector-specific requirements seamlessly.

Bonitasoft

Flowable is a versatile software that streamlines and automates business processes. It is commonly used for workflow management, task automation, and digital transformation initiatives.

Users also utilize Flowable for document management, case management, and customer journey mapping. Its valuable features include efficient workflow management, seamless integration capabilities, and a user-friendly interface.

Flowable allows for smooth collaboration and task automation, and its ability to integrate with other systems and applications enables a seamless flow of information.

The intuitive and easy-to-use interface makes it accessible to users of all technical backgrounds.

Flowable

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Cisco 4. Dell 5. Ericsson 6. Ford 7. General Electric 8. Honda 9. IBM 10. Johnson & Johnson 11. Kia Motors 12. LG Electronics 13. Microsoft 14. Nike 15. Oracle 16. PepsiCo 17. Qualcomm 18. Red Bull 19. Samsung 20. Toyota 21. Uber 22. Visa 23. Walmart 24. Xerox 25. Yahoo 26. Zara 27. Accenture 28. Bank of America 29. Citigroup 30. Deutsche Bank 31. ExxonMobil 32. Facebook

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, PagerDuty and others in Process Automation. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.