BizFlow vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

BizFlow and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BizFlow is ranked #41, while OpenText is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.3. BizFlow holds a 0.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BizFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

BizFlow

Read 3 BizFlow reviews

493 Views
488 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

805 Views
757 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BizFlow

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and BizFlow are business process management solutions. OpenText 360 for SharePoint might have an advantage due to its seamless integration with SharePoint, while BizFlow offers extensive customization capabilities.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers efficient SharePoint integration, improved document management, and workflow automation tailored for Microsoft environments. BizFlow provides advanced automation, flexibility for custom workflows, and robust analytics for process optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 integrates well within SharePoint environments ensuring a straightforward setup with responsive support. BizFlow allows extensive customization but requires more involvement during deployment, balanced by dedicated support for complex implementations.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers a cost-effective approach for organizations using SharePoint, enhancing ROI through seamless integration and resource efficiency. BizFlow, though with higher initial costs, presents significant ROI opportunities for enterprises needing tailored automation solutions with its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed BizFlow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizFlow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of BizFlow is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	0.9%
BizFlow	0.8%
Other	98.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because other tools in the market have extra capabilities that BizFlow doesn't have yet. They have some built-in capabilities and AI features, and everyone is thinking about how to implement AI in their area. I haven't seen any updates from BizFlow on this, but they might plan to implement it soon. However, we don't have this capability right now. This could be one reason why people might move from BizFlow to another tool. For example, with Nintex, we can integrate Google Cloud and achieve some functionality from Google Cloud as well. IBM also introduced some free tests in their DPM services with AI. These are good things in the market right now.

Read full review

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."

"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

"The benefits that OpenText 360 for SharePoint has brought to my company include improved turnaround time."

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

Cons

"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"It has a reasonable price."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs BizFlow

Compared 46% of the time

IBM BPM vs BizFlow

Compared 27% of the time

More BizFlow Competitors

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 16% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow

January 2026

Download BizFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Overview

Business process management & workflow automation software; designed to work with people and with existing systems.

BizFlow

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

Sample Customers

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement, The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Naval Special Warfare, Jardine Lloyd Thompson, Premier Pensions Management Ltd, Continental AG, Samsung Heavy Industries, Brazos Higher Education Service Corporation

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

December 2025

Free Report: BizFlow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about BizFlow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizFlow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.