We performed a comparison between BizFlow and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"It has an open BPM"
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"The solution is good for data models."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old."
BizFlow is ranked 29th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. BizFlow is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BizFlow writes "Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". BizFlow is most compared with , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our BizFlow vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
