BizFlow vs Camunda comparison

BizFlow and Camunda are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BizFlow is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. BizFlow holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to Camunda’s 16.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BizFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Camunda users who would recommend it.

BizFlow

Read 3 BizFlow reviews

269 Views
264 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

21,608 Views
14,910 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

BizFlow

Camunda

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

BizFlow and Camunda serve as competing business workflow automation tools. Camunda appears to have a competitive edge due to its advanced features and robust integration capabilities, which justify its higher price point.

Features: Camunda is recognized for its open architecture, seamless integration with other enterprise systems, and granular control over workflow processes. BizFlow focuses on ease of use, strong configuration options, and adaptive case management for less technically demanding implementations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda follows a developer-focused deployment model requiring significant technical expertise, supported by extensive documentation and community support. BizFlow offers a straightforward setup experience with comprehensive support services and customer assistance for a smoother transition.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda’s higher licensing fees align with its comprehensive features and scalability, offering greater ROI for complex workflow needs. BizFlow's lower setup costs and efficient deployment make it a cost-effective option for straightforward automation.

To learn more, read our detailed BizFlow vs. Camunda Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. Camunda

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizFlow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of BizFlow is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 16.0%, down from 21.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	16.0%
BizFlow	0.3%
Other	83.7%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because other tools in the market have extra capabilities that BizFlow doesn't have yet. They have some built-in capabilities and AI features, and everyone is thinking about how to implement AI in their area. I haven't seen any updates from BizFlow on this, but they might plan to implement it soon. However, we don't have this capability right now. This could be one reason why people might move from BizFlow to another tool. For example, with Nintex, we can integrate Google Cloud and achieve some functionality from Google Cloud as well. IBM also introduced some free tests in their DPM services with AI. These are good things in the market right now.

Read full review

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."

"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."

"Camunda seems to have a lot of traction, maturity, and stability. It also matches the need for agile development."

"Camunda is a scalable product."

"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."

"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."

"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."

"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."

"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."

More Camunda pros

Cons

"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."

"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."

"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."

"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."

More Camunda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license."

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."

"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizFlow?

There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BizFlow?

Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license. Where...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizFlow?

Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of devel...

See all answers

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow

September 2025

Download BizFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

September 2025

Download Camunda product report

Also Known As

No data available

Camunda BPM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

BizFlow

Camunda

Overview

Business process management & workflow automation software; designed to work with people and with existing systems.

BizFlow

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

Sample Customers

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement, The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Naval Special Warfare, Jardine Lloyd Thompson, Premier Pensions Management Ltd, Continental AG, Samsung Heavy Industries, Brazos Higher Education Service Corporation

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. Camunda

September 2025

Free Report: BizFlow vs. Camunda

Find out what your peers are saying about BizFlow vs. Camunda and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizFlow vs. Camunda report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.