BizFlow vs Camunda comparison

BizFlow and Camunda are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BizFlow is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. BizFlow holds a 0.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Camunda’s 19.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BizFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Camunda users who would recommend it.

BizFlow

Read 3 BizFlow reviews

218 Views
211 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

23,608 Views
16,762 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

BizFlow

Camunda

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

BizFlow and Camunda serve as competing business workflow automation tools. Camunda appears to have a competitive edge due to its advanced features and robust integration capabilities, which justify its higher price point.

Features: Camunda is recognized for its open architecture, seamless integration with other enterprise systems, and granular control over workflow processes. BizFlow focuses on ease of use, strong configuration options, and adaptive case management for less technically demanding implementations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda follows a developer-focused deployment model requiring significant technical expertise, supported by extensive documentation and community support. BizFlow offers a straightforward setup experience with comprehensive support services and customer assistance for a smoother transition.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda’s higher licensing fees align with its comprehensive features and scalability, offering greater ROI for complex workflow needs. BizFlow's lower setup costs and efficient deployment make it a cost-effective option for straightforward automation.

To learn more, read our detailed BizFlow vs. Camunda Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. Camunda

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,722 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizFlow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of BizFlow is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 19.1%, down from 21.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because other tools in the market have extra capabilities that BizFlow doesn't have yet. They have some built-in capabilities and AI features, and everyone is thinking about how to implement AI in their area. I haven't seen any updates from BizFlow on this, but they might plan to implement it soon. However, we don't have this capability right now. This could be one reason why people might move from BizFlow to another tool. For example, with Nintex, we can integrate Google Cloud and achieve some functionality from Google Cloud as well. IBM also introduced some free tests in their DPM services with AI. These are good things in the market right now.

Read full review

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."

"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."

"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."

"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."

"Camunda is a scalable product."

"The product is stable."

"The architectural part of Camunda for workflow design is highly valuable, especially the Camunda Modeler, which allows quick process design and implementation."

"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."

More Camunda pros

Cons

"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."

"The latency of API could be decreased."

"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."

"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."

"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."

"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."

"The initial setup can be complex for business users."

"I would like to see better pricing."

More Camunda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license."

"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."

"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

"Camunda's pricing is good."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizFlow?

There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BizFlow?

Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license. Where...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizFlow?

Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of devel...

See all answers

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow

August 2025

Download BizFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

August 2025

Download Camunda product report

Also Known As

No data available

Camunda BPM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

BizFlow

Camunda

Overview

Business process management & workflow automation software; designed to work with people and with existing systems.

BizFlow

Camunda drives business process automation and AI orchestration, enhancing efficiency and innovation without compromising security and governance. Trusted by major brands like Atlassian, it seamlessly integrates systems and human tasks for impactful digital transformation.

Camunda is renowned for fostering collaboration between business and IT, empowering over 700 organizations across diverse sectors to manage and improve business-critical processes. With its flexible architecture, Camunda supports BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, allowing for efficient modeling and smooth integration with environments via REST APIs. This open-source platform offers extensive customization and combines enterprise features such as process history tracking and decision table editing, supporting both technical and non-technical users in achieving efficient automation strategies. While performance and scalability issues exist, especially in the cloud, Camunda remains a top choice for companies like ING and Vodafone.

What are Camunda's standout features?

Lightweight, scalable architecture: Facilitates smooth business process automation.
BPMN, CMMN, DMN support: Ensures comprehensive process modeling capabilities.
REST API integration: Enables seamless connectivity with different environments.
Open-source customization: Offers flexibility for adapting to specific needs.
Enterprise features: Includes process history, graphical modifications, and decision table editing.

What benefits can users expect from Camunda?

Increased efficiency: Streamlined automation processes boost productivity.
Collaboration: Facilitates synergy between IT and business teams.
Competitive advantage: Enables organizations to stay ahead through innovation.
Customization: Adapts to precise business process requirements.
Scalability: Expands with organizational growth demands.

In sectors like banking and government, Camunda's fast prototyping and workflow automation capabilities optimize processes such as client onboarding and investment banking workflows. It enhances social governance tasks, credit flows, and enterprise integration, while also being used in insurance and telecom for automating repetitive tasks and improving efficiency. Organizations utilize Camunda for training and service management, showcasing its versatility across industries.

Camunda

Sample Customers

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement, The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Naval Special Warfare, Jardine Lloyd Thompson, Premier Pensions Management Ltd, Continental AG, Samsung Heavy Industries, Brazos Higher Education Service Corporation

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. Camunda

July 2025

Free Report: BizFlow vs. Camunda

Find out what your peers are saying about BizFlow vs. Camunda and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizFlow vs. Camunda report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.