We performed a comparison between BizFlow and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."
"We have automated processes with IBM BPM and DocuSign. Its valuable features include low-code, timer, etc. It makes it simple to implement the products. We generate reports using the solution."
"It has improved my organization quite a bit. It brought awareness to what the business processes are, even to the business side, who did not necessarily know what they are."
"We are implementing the tool to triple our monthly transaction volume."
"IBM BPM should become cloud-native. It should also add a cloud deployment feature."
"IBM BPM is a stable solution."
"The possibility to add Java code as embedded .jar, that increases the flexibility of the solution."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"It has reduced a lot of manual errors and processes."
"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."
"The solution can improve integration with SAP, CRM, and Salesforce, which is not capital-intensive."
"I have an interest around the robotic piece, and integrating that with the processes. I think that is certainly a good direction to be going."
"There is room for improvement in the stability."
"User Interface components could be further refined to enhance and extend customizations dictated by end clients."
"IBM BPM uses JavaScript as a programming language for the server-side. I don’t know why it’s not Java, as it’s more powerful and the JavaScript part is translated into Java anyway."
"The people working on the front desk are having some problem with managing the documentation. For instance, they get a picture, and if the picture comes rotated 90 degrees, together with a picture that is not rotated, they have some problems dealing with that, technically. There are some minor aspects that on the usability side that are still lacking. That has to do with FileNet, too, I'm talking about the suite together."
"I'd like the tool to be more flexible."
"We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes."
BizFlow is ranked 29th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. BizFlow is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BizFlow writes "Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". BizFlow is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our BizFlow vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
