We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Coralogix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."
"We like this searchability and availability of the data."
"Provides an overview and high-level information."
"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."
"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."
"In the last company where I worked about a year ago, it looked very simple."
"Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy."
"This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better."
"The default interface should be improved."
"They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good."
"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."
"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."
"The monitoring of Kubernetes clusters needs improvement to be on par with competitors."
"I need connectivity with cost management."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Coralogix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Elastic Search. See our Azure Monitor vs. Coralogix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
