Coralogix vs Datadog comparison

Coralogix and Datadog are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.2, while Datadog is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Coralogix holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Datadog’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Datadog users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 12 Coralogix reviews

2,969 Views
1,633 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Datadog

Read 207 Datadog reviews

22,829 Views
13,926 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Datadog

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Datadog and Coralogix compete in the IT infrastructure management and monitoring category. Datadog has the upper hand due to its robust monitoring features and wide range of integrations, while Coralogix is recognized for its specialized log analysis capabilities and cost efficiency.

Features:Datadog provides extensive integration with numerous cloud services, robust monitoring with sharable dashboards, and support for various metrics and alerts. Coralogix excels in log management efficiency, offering a straightforward configuration and dynamic log control, which is especially beneficial for smaller operations.

Room for Improvement:Datadog could enhance data usage transparency and error traceability, with more automated real-time metrics and improved logging solutions. Coralogix can improve its interface usability and broaden its functionalities, increasing its support for anomaly detection through AI.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Datadog supports multiple deployment models across public, private, and hybrid clouds, receiving mixed reviews on customer service effectiveness during complex issues. Coralogix, focusing on public cloud scenarios, is praised for its efficient and immediate customer support, catering well to smaller-scale needs.

Pricing and ROI:Datadog's pricing is higher, particularly as usage scales, justified by its comprehensive feature set providing a high ROI for enterprise-level needs. Coralogix offers a cost-managed pricing strategy that is preferred by teams seeking budget efficiency for extensive logging demands, delivering strong value when assessing cost against benefits on a smaller scale.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Datadog Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Datadog

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

20th

Ranking in Log Management

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (24th), API Management (16th), Streaming Analytics (14th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Datadog

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

1st

Ranking in Log Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

207

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 6.6%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Datadog	6.6%
Coralogix	1.1%
Other	92.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Dhroov Patel

Site Reliability Engineer at Grainger

Has improved incident response with better root cause visibility and supports flexible on-call scheduling

Datadog needs to introduce more hard limits to cost. If we see a huge log spike, administrators should have more control over what happens to save costs. If a service starts logging extensively, I want the ability to automatically direct that log into the cheapest log bucket. This should be the case with many offerings. If we're seeing too much APM, we need to be aware of it and able to stop it rather than having administrators reach out to specific teams. Datadog has become significantly slower over the last year. They could improve performance at the risk of slowing down feature work. More resources need to go into Fleet Automation because we face many problems with things such as the Ansible role to install Datadog in non-containerized hosts. We mainly want to see performance improvements, less time spent looking at costs, the ability to trust that costs will stay reasonable, and an easier way to manage our agents. It is such a powerful tool with much potential on the horizon, but cost control, performance, and agent management need improvement. The main issues are with the administrative side rather than the actual application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coralogix has positively impacted my organization by providing a centralized console to monitor the dashboard, giving me rich flexibility to see different sorts of data that is spread across the logs, metrics, or traces, which are the typical pillars of the observability tool."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

More Coralogix pros

"Datadog has clear dashboards and good documentation."

"Datadog agents act as an integration to different services, providing easy access and management."

"The logging in general is one of my favorite features."

"The dashboards are super convenient to us for a more zoomed out view of what is going on with each integration that we utilize."

"When an alert fires, our on-call engineer can see the infrastructure metric spike (like CPU), pivot directly to the application traces (APM) running on that host, and see the exact, correlated logs from the services causing the problem—all in one place."

"APM and tracing are super useful."

"The centralized pipeline tracking and error logging provide a comprehensive view of our development and deployment processes, making it much easier to identify and resolve issues quickly."

"I like how we can customize alerts, and when alerts have become too noisy, we turn their threshold down fairly easily."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"In terms of documentation, I think there can be more user-friendly documentation that stresses more on day-to-day issues."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

More Coralogix cons

"I've only been using Datadog for a few months, and at first, it was frankly overwhelming in terms of both the UI and the available capabilities."

"The pricing model can be quite complex and might benefit from more flexible options tailored to different organizational needs."

"The pricing is a bit confusing."

"We need more advanced querying against logs."

"Datadog probably didn't save me a ton of time because there are so many replay videos that I had to sort through in order to find the particular sales reps that I'm looking for for our beta test group."

"I sometimes log in and see items changed, either in the UI or a feature enabled. To see it for the first time without proper communication can sometimes come as a shock."

"In some cases the screenshots don't match the text as updates are made."

"Presently, the billing CSV reports provide insights into billing-related information yet are somewhat limited in functionality, typically offering reports with only three columns."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

"The solution's pricing depends on project volume."

"This solution is budget friendly."

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost."

"While it is an expensive product, I would rate the pricing level at four out of five."

"The tool is open-source."

"The pricing and licensing through AWS Marketplace has been good. It would be nice if it was cheaper, but their pricing is reasonable for what it is. Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	95

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

Comparisons

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Logz.io vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 5% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

OpsRamp vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

November 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Datadog

November 2025

Download Datadog product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.

Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Sharable Dashboards: Facilitate collaboration with customizable, intuitive dashboards.
Extensive Integrations: Seamlessly connects with tools like Slack and AWS to support workflows.
APM and RUM: Provides deep insights into application performance and user interactions.
Real-Time Tools: Enables agile responses to system issues with real-time monitoring.
Unified Tagging and Visualization: Eases management of complex systems with simplified visualization.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For?

Efficient Troubleshooting: Centralized logging speeds up the identification and resolution of issues.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrations with popular tools enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Observability: Comprehensive monitoring improves system reliability and performance.
Resource Optimization: Efficient microservices and container management leads to better cloud resource utilization.
Responsive Alerts: Customizable alerts ensure timely identification of critical issues.

In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.

Datadog

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Datadog

November 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Datadog

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Datadog and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Datadog report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.