AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Druva inSync comparison

"The SaaS feature of AvePoint Cloud Backup is very strong."

"It is the best product in the market for Office 365 backup, and our customers are satisfied with it."

"The most valuable features are the email backup and the SharePoint backup."

"The recovery options in Microsoft 365 are not adequate and it does not help to recover data from the recycle bin that is older than 90 days. The solution has made us more efficient and helps to recover data that is older than 90 days."

"It is a very good and stable solution...With AvePoint's support, our experience has been exceptional"

"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."

"It is the only product in the market that offers platform backup."

"The backup and recovery functionalities of the product are very useful."

"The recovery aspect of the solution is its most valuable feature."

"The main benefit of this solution is that it automatically scans the files for ransomware after the backup is complete."

"Druva is offered as a service so that we can access it from any enterprise-based browser or URL. We also have a single sign-on, which allows me to log in securely. Hence, I can easily access the system, configure it, perform day-to-day monitoring tasks, and check for any issues or configurations needed. Overall, it's a simple and easy-to-use tool with a high-speed and straightforward interface for management."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Druva inSync is very easy to use."

"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."

"Our customers do not need to purchase third party storage or a separate server for data backup."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 10."

"I would like to see improvements in the tool's initial seed. The initial seed of around 10 TB of SharePoint data took 45 days to complete."

"It is challenging for small or medium-sized businesses to purchase it."

"The component in the product that can be improved revolves around the area where the tool should focus on providing more of a custom touch to the policies."

"The restoration could be faster."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The configuration could be made easier."

"It is not a traditional restore process and it is somewhat limited in what we can do."

"It would be beneficial to have a more optimal Google Backup for larger environments."

"One functionality I would like is the ability to manage multiple Office 365 tenants from a single console."

"The backup time is very poor. The backup runs continuously. It goes on from morning till night. The system performance also becomes very poor when Druva inSync is running."

"The support team generally needs to be more proactive with technical and general suggestions."

"Druva inSync is very high in price. A general customer cannot afford this solution. Even if the product is good, people cannot afford such a high cost just for taking the backup. This is a recurring investment, and the customers have to pay for it every year. Druva is also yet to develop the channel and the channel or partner commitment."

"The current procedure for data encryption is not as straightforward"

"The support of other cloud services needs to be improved. It has very good cloud support for AWS but not with others."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"I rate the product's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The platform is more expensive than other vendors."

"It costs a little bit more than other competitors in the market."

"I would say that the pricing policy of the product is flexible and good."

"The pricing part of the solution is based on a subscription model, which is based on the number of users or storage capacity."

"It is very good for many of my customers in the banking and finance segments. The price isn't a problem there, but in some other industries, people ask for a cheaper solution. When the price is an issue for the customer, we recommend Veeam, Metallic."

"I am not sure, but I believe that the cost is $7 USD per user."

"The product is fairly priced, I would rate its pricing five out of ten."

"The pricing is good."

"The pricing of Druva inSync is very high as compared to other cloud backup solutions."

"The pricing is thirty-five dollars per year or three dollars per month per user."

"Once you decide to go with this product the cost can be worked out with the vendor."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive."

"It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"The price is quite good, It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."