Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Cisco are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.2% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Cisco’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Aruba Wireless

Read 151 Aruba Wireless reviews

14,129 Views
12,716 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cisco Wireless

Read 155 Cisco Wireless reviews

9,143 Views
8,960 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

991 Views
971 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Aruba Wireless

Cisco Wireless

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN.

To learn more, read our detailed Wireless LAN Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Wireless LAN

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,728 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Wireless is 13.2%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Wireless is 9.2%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Aruba Wireless	13.2%
Cisco Wireless	9.2%
Mojo Networks	1.1%
Other	76.5%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Uma B.M

IT Infra Deputy Vice President at ESFB

Strong performance supports network team effectively but guest access compatibility needs improvement

We connect the network using Aruba Wireless. We connect our office network, and we use it primarily within our network team Aruba Wireless has many features, especially their state-of-the-art controller, which can be connected to the cloud. They also have an unlimited lifetime warranty, which is…

Read full review

EvansEsezobor

Group IT Head at Euracare

Has enabled centralized user management and improved wireless access point aggregation

To improve Cisco Wireless, the ports on the access points are all 100 Meg, not 1 gig. We have not gotten a gigabyte interface of about 1,000, but the controller we have is just 1 gig. We would prefer if we could increase the controller to a 10 gig interface because we want to connect our controller to a 10 gig interface, which currently limits us to 1 gig. When we want to move higher capacity data via wireless, it limits us to 1 gig.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Aruba Central portal is a good interface that helps us monitor the wireless devices extensively. Furthermore, the access points we use, mainly API nine zero five, are working well."

"The overall product review rating is nine out of ten."

"We find its stability very valuable, as it has been running for the past three years with no default configuration."

"ClearPass helps a lot with administration."

"The most valuable feature is the client match."

"For a newbie type of product, it's not very easy to compete with the market, especially with the Cisco controller manager, but I think Aruba is on top, nowadays, in the market."

"The solution is quite stable and very robust."

"We appreciate the integration options that are available."

More Aruba Wireless pros

"It can provide support for real-time applications, such as VoIP and Video Conferencing over wireless infrastructure."

"Even though Cisco tends to be more costly than other solutions you get more than you pay for."

"For me, there are two important features: 1) WLAN grouping – Allows us to have different groups and, within those groups, specific WLANs, so there is no overlapping. 2) FlexConnect – Enables us to have remote offices at different locations. We can have a central WLC to control all the locations."

"This product has a long life and you don't have any issues with it."

"It is good, and it works."

"Unified management, reporting, stability, and most importantly seamless roaming."

"Wireless connectivity is the main feature. It is also securely integrated with ISE, which is valuable because, in the banking industry, we also cover the security aspect. This Wi-Fi controller integrates with the ISE system that we have. Every user that comes on the wireless needs to log in with the domain. If they don't, it will not allow the user to join the network. This is the key feature of this solution."

"Cisco Wireless products are easy to use."

More Cisco Wireless pros

"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."

"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

"It's scalable. You don't have to configure an access point. Literally, if I needed a new one, I just take it right out of the box, go plug it into our network. It finds our Mojo network, and then it talks to the other access points that are close to it, and then it literally adopts the policies, and meshes itself in our network."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

"The solution is very stable."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"Configuration could be made easier with more bandwidth than they offer at the moment."

"There is a long queue whenever we reach out to support, and we have to wait for them to answer calls. Once we get in touch with them, we have to coordinate with different teams, so our engineers struggle to understand who are the correct team members. I think support is another area where Aruba needs to improve."

"Aruba Wireless is a good product, but it still has some issues, especially at the beginning, where there's inconsistent syncing between the cloud and the APs. Sometimes, there's also a little lag when accessing the query."

"Initial setup was complex."

"Not cost-effective."

"Currently, the stability of the code is the basic underlying problem for us. They had an 8.6 release that came out two weeks ago, but we had to migrate twice because the code wasn't stable. We can't get things to work the same way. Version 8 was a big change for them. They made a change so that it is forced to be a managed hierarchical system. It means that you make changes at the top, and it pushes them downstream. There are a lot of problems with the 8.6 version code. I ran into four bugs in one week and was informed that we should just move onto the next one because all of those fixes have taken place. The feedback loop for fixes is not always really relayed back to you. I don't have a lot of strong things to say about version 8.6. When we had version 6, the controller was pretty much rock solid. We had no problems. We made a heavy investment to migrate a lot of stuff to take advantage of things like WPA3, Wi-Fi 6, and all that kind of stuff, and we haven't been able to turn those features on because we are not confident that they are going to work just yet. So, right now, we're still very much stumbling through the version 8.6 code and just trying to make sure that it is safe before we turn on some of those features. In terms of the marketplace, they are one of the top three leaders. In some respects, one of the things that they focus on is wireless. Therefore, there are some things that should be beyond reproach, as far as I'm concerned. In terms of the stability of the code, there are always going to be bugs, but the core stability of the code needs to be there. When it is not stable, that's a real problem for me because you lose a lot of confidence in the products."

"The price is high and not too reasonable. It is very high compared to other products."

"I believe it would benefit from more reporting, other than just a dashboard. It needs some type of report builder so you can have PDFs to show upper management what is going on in the wireless network."

More Aruba Wireless cons

"The integration with our CM and other technologies could improve this solution."

"It would be great if it is compatible with other products."

"Price is a concern. Although Cisco has an excellent solution, being competitive in the market is important."

"Cisco's architecture is becoming complex."

"It would be better if some utility lets us know the best place to install the system. Every time we install it, we have to change it, and we have to add more access points. This is a problem we have all the time. It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with products from other vendors. It'll also help if they included a device diagnostics feature in the next release."

"The biggest reason why we could no longer continue with Cisco Wireless was because of the high cost to upgrade everything."

"There is no technology without room for improvement. The main setback with Cisco solutions, not only with Cisco Wireless, is having to update the OS manually. We are now migrating to Miraki, so we've been able to work that out."

"The price should be reduced. It should be cheaper."

More Cisco Wireless cons

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"The user interface could use some improvement, and Mojo is working on it."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different apps to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"Technical support could be more helpful. They are lacking a bit in that regard."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Aruba Wireless could improve. It is expensive. However, I am able to reduce my costs because I do not use all the features in the controller, such as the AD integration and other enterprise features."

"The price could be better. Competitors offer more features for a similar cost."

"The product is expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten"

"Licencing can be surprising and needs improvement. Look into all features, what you need versus what you want, and know that nothing comes without some kind of license."

"The access points are more cost-effective over some other providers, both in cost per AP and the option of a controller-less environment."

"Aruba is probably cheaper than Cisco, and yet you get all the things that you want."

"The support pricing for Juniper Mist is higher than Aruba."

More Aruba Wireless pricing and cost advice

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Cisco Wireless."

"I rate the tool's pricing a ten out of ten. It is expensive compared to Aruba and Juniper."

"It is an expensive product. I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Never pay the full GPL price."

"It's a bit expensive but it's professional and works properly."

"There are annual subscriptions to use this solution. I have not been able to understand the licensing of Cisco. Some of the Cisco executives were not able to understand them either. When you first start out the price is zero but when it comes to a time of renewal you have to pay."

"The license structure is confusing."

More Cisco Wireless pricing and cost advice

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user212721

President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 24, 2015

Cisco vs. Aruba Wireless Solutions

Cisco or Aruba Networks? If you are considering wireless access solutions, this is a common question that you are probably asking. You probably have sales people knocking at your door. How do you make sense of all the stories that you are presented with. If you have done any research, you are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

University

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Marketing Services Firm

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	77
Midsize Enterprise	47
Large Enterprise	75

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	78
Midsize Enterprise	41
Large Enterprise	73

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they h...

See all answers

Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?

At my organization, we researched Ruckus Wireless among other solutions but ultimately chose Aruba wireless. What di...

See all answers

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?

On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three ...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user frie...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco Wireless?

Cisco Wireless improves mobility and flexibility. The only case we are working on is with hospitals, focusing on the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are requir...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the f...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 26% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 14% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

More Aruba Wireless Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 29% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Wireless Competitors

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 4% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Wireless

March 2026

Download Aruba Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless

March 2026

Download Cisco Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

March 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

Aruba WLAN, HP WLAN, HP Wireless, Aruba Instant On AP Series Access Point

Cisco WLAN Controller

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Aruba Wireless is a secure, high-performance, multi-user wireless LAN supporting Wi-Fi 6. As workplaces and user expectations change, users can now maintain hybrid workplaces and IoT without compromising performance, reliability, or security. Aruba Wireless delivers better performance and capacity and greater AIOps visibility throughout all devices and users. In addition, through built-in network intelligence, network operations are made simpler while keeping everything secure through user and guest encryption.

Aruba Wireless, offered through Aruba Networks, is helping achieve digital transformation and IoT with seamless connectivity through multiple Wi-Fi access points. For the user’s convenience, Aruba Wireless provides indoor, outdoor, and remote access points to help boost faster and safer connectivity.

Choosing Aruba Wireless can help improve your organization’s user experience with wireless LAN in many ways, including:

Transforming hybrid workplaces: Employees can move seamlessly between home and office, with reliable internet and without compromising security.
Connect and protect IoT: With built-in AP support for BLE, Zigbee, and USB-port extensions, users can extend visibility, control, and connectivity to IoT devices and applications.
Expand the 5G experience to the enterprise network: Empower users to experience 5G with Wi-Fi 6 by automatically enabling cellular devices to join Aruba Wireless LAN securely and reliably.

Aruba Gateways and Controllers

Small organizations as well as large enterprises require excellent performance and security for cloud, mobility, and digital transformation. Therefore, in addition to the access points, Aruba Wireless also offers a variety of gateways and controllers, including:

9000 Series: With SD-WAN capabilities, it’s excellent for small campus networks looking for enhanced Wi-Fi scalability and security.
7200 Series: Perfect for campus WLAN scalability or branch SD-WAN and VPN Concentrator capabilities, the 7200 Series optimizes Wi-Fi performance to guarantee smooth roaming.
7000 Series: Acting as a controller or gateway to provide WAN intelligence, the 7000 Series is a policy-based router and an excellent solution for small to mid-sized campuses.
Mobility Controller Virtual Appliance: Maximizes Wi-Fi and network services in an economical, virtualized environment.
SD-WAN Virtual Gateways: Orchestrate virtual gateways in public cloud infrastructure, like Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Mobility Conductor Hardware Appliance: While enhancing the scalability and reliability for large campus WLANs, Aruba Mobility Conductors bring the full capability of ArubaOS.
Mobility Conductor Virtual Appliance: To scale large campus deployments, Aruba Mobility Conductors simplify the deployment and management of up to 1,000 Mobility Controllers.
ArubaOS Network Operating System: Great for remote workers in mid-sized and large companies who need seamless connectivity to and security over Wi-Fi.

Reviews from Real Users

Aruba Networks is aiding organizations in transforming to a hybrid work environment with Aruba Wireless. Users especially love its ability to work with many devices and its ability to group and manage access points.

A senior IT solutions architect at a manufacturing company says, "The most valuable feature is the fact that it can work with many devices. It supports everything that we need it to."

Gary F., a network administrator at wireless at Abilene Christian, notes, "I like the way it groups and manages access points."

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Cisco Wireless is a comprehensive suite of wireless solutions designed to deliver secure, high-performance connectivity for enterprises of all sizes. Offering a range of access points, controllers, and advanced management tools, Cisco Wireless ensures seamless and reliable network access, enhancing mobility and productivity.

Cisco Wireless solutions provide robust, scalable wireless networks capable of supporting high-density environments and diverse applications. With features such as seamless roaming, advanced security protocols, and detailed analytics, Cisco Wireless addresses the needs of modern businesses. The solutions include the Cisco Catalyst and Aironet series access points, wireless LAN controllers, and the Cisco DNA Center for centralized management and automation.

What are the key features of Cisco Wireless?

High-Density Performance: Optimized for environments with a high number of devices, ensuring reliable connectivity and performance.
Advanced Security: Incorporates robust security measures such as WPA3, Secure Boot, and segmentation to protect data and devices.
Seamless Roaming: Enables uninterrupted connectivity as users move across different areas within the network.
Centralized Management: Cisco DNA Center provides a single pane of glass for managing and automating wireless networks, enhancing operational efficiency.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports various deployment models, including on-premises, cloud-managed, and hybrid solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Cisco Wireless?

Improved Mobility and Productivity: Users often highlight how Cisco Wireless enhances user mobility and productivity through reliable and consistent connectivity.
Scalability: Reviews frequently mention the scalability of Cisco Wireless, making it suitable for growing businesses.
Ease of Management: Many users appreciate the centralized management capabilities, which simplify network administration and troubleshooting.
Enhanced Security: The advanced security features are often noted for providing peace of mind and compliance with industry standards.
User Experience: The overall user experience, including ease of use and seamless integration with other Cisco products, is a common point of praise.

Cisco Wireless solutions are implemented across various industries, including healthcare, education, retail, and manufacturing. In healthcare, they support critical applications like patient monitoring and electronic health records. Educational institutions use Cisco Wireless to provide reliable internet access for students and staff. Retailers benefit from enhanced customer experiences through in-store connectivity, while manufacturers use wireless networks to improve operational efficiency and automation.

Pricing and licensing for Cisco Wireless solutions are typically based on the scale of deployment and specific product selections. Cisco offers various support plans, including 24/7 customer service, technical support, and access to software updates and patches.

In summary, Cisco Wireless provides robust, scalable wireless networking solutions that enhance connectivity, security, and management for diverse enterprise environments.

Cisco

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Sample Customers

Consulate Health Care, Los Angeles Unified School District, Science Applications International Corp (SAIC), San Diego State University, KFC, ACTS Retirement-Life Communities

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.