We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The simplicity is great."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The stability of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is very good."
"The solution is trustworthy. I find it easy and secure."
"We're able to automate as well as manually control as necessary."
"The most valuable thing to me is the stability of the product."
"I like the status page Cisco added that shows you the health of the wireless connection."
"The solution is easy to install."
"The network security the solution provides is its most valuable aspect."
"Its flexibility, ease of management via the portal, and the variety of access points are the most valuable features."
"The security is a valuable feature."
"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."
"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The ease of use is average. It could be more user-friendly."
"Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could improve by having more granularity in terms of the data displayed. However, I understand that with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, you need to have a compromise point to what are the functions that you're going to provide to the users versus ease of use. More granularity in terms of the data and the things that you can do to the devices would be helpful. For example, when we wanted to make a change, restriction, or segregation within Palo Alto, we can go to the level of detail that we want. The amount of detail provided is amazing, it is very granular. However, it comes with much more difficulty, it requires a technical understanding of the environment compared to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN."
"There could be more functionality."
"The initial setup was simple. However, the full deployment could be easier."
"Its price could be improved."
"If there are advanced features that you can have enabled, they should allow users access to that in an easier manner."
"Concern when there are a number of concurrent users."
"It would be nice to have licensing that stays in place while the system is being renovated or changed."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."
"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."
"The setup was complex."
More Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 62 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 21st in Wireless LAN with 4 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.0, while Mojo Networks is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Highly reliable, effective site blocking, and beneficial reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "Secure built-in wireless, stable, scalable, and has the best support". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Ruckus Wireless, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Fortinet FortiWLM, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Ruckus Wireless. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
