Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Arista is ranked #24. Cisco holds a 10.1% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 123 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

13,362 Views
12,026 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,980 Views
1,940 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks are competitors in cloud-managed wireless networking solutions. Meraki is favored for its ease of deployment and robust integration, making it appealing for less technical users, while Mojo is recognized for its strong security features, which may be more attractive to those prioritizing network protection.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers comprehensive visibility into network issues via its centralized dashboard, easy deployment, and good device integration capabilities, which appeal to users seeking streamlined management. Mojo Networks, recently acquired by Arista, is distinguished by its advanced security features, like Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (WIPS), guest WiFi capabilities, and robust analytics tools that provide detailed insights into network usage and performance.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could improve on the granularity of data logs and simplify complex rule configurations, as users find these areas challenging. Additionally, its licensing model and customer support have been flagged as problematic, with support seen as sometimes slow. Mojo Networks would benefit from a more intuitive management portal and a more integrated dashboard experience to streamline network monitoring and configuration. Users also desire expanded application security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks provide easy deployment through cloud-based solutions, but the customer service experiences differ. Cisco Meraki's support is generally fast and effective, though inconsistent at times. Mojo Networks is praised for its responsive technical support, making it easier for users to engage with support teams for problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is known for premium pricing that reflects its high-quality performance, though the cost of licensing can be high if licenses expire. Despite this, many users report a positive ROI due to reduced administrative overheads. Mojo Networks offers competitive pricing compared to major brands like Meraki and balances cost with strong features. Its pricing is appealing to those valuing security and ease of use, providing significant ROI by lowering operational expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.7

Number of Reviews

123

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 10.1%, down from 11.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	10.1%
Mojo Networks	1.6%
Other	88.3%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

reviewer2847906

Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Wireless management has become efficient with rich client visibility for troubleshooting

In terms of specific challenges with hybrid environments, I face no issues. I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in my IT environment as pretty efficient for the most part. I would rate it at approximately 80%. I have had some issues with the dashboard itself and as far as switch management goes, but that is not necessarily on the wireless side of things. The wireless side has been quite good. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN optimizes the experience in a hybrid or distributed enterprise setup. My impression of the end-to-end visibility offered by Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is quite good. I function as an admin. What stood out to make me choose Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that I already leverage many products with Cisco. I have Catalyst switching, ACI infrastructure, and use them for my core and edge routers. I would give this review an overall rating of 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The basic value of the product is the ease of use and ease of access from anywhere."

"For anyone looking for a simple management solution in a geographically spread-out network, Meraki is a good bet compared to Ruckus."

"The solution is easy to use."

"It makes life easier; you don't have to go cabling, it saves time, it saves man hours, it's just better."

"The most valuable features in Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN are that we were able to see all the registered users for each particular WAP, which is a big help. The roaming allows us to have continuous wireless throughout the building. The signal can carry over from one WAP to another. Which is probably the most important feature."

"You can scale the solution easily."

"Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a stable and reliable solution."

"I would recommend the solution to others, we have sold it to over 100 customers."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."

"Built-in guest analytics and advanced guest portal features allow our customers to create a guest experience which is typically only available with complex and expensive third-party software."

"The Mojo has proved to handle these high-density requirements and perform better than many competitive devices."

"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."

"The solution is very stable."

"Their Cognitive WiFi analytics (Mojo Aware) is the biggest feature on their dashboard. It helps us know where the problem, so we don't have to spend time with the customer diagnosing it."

"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"It would be nice to have licensing that stays in place while the system is being renovated or changed."

"We would like to see Wi-Fi 6 support for devices sold in the Middle East."

"Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's management tools need enhancement."

"The only thing that always causes problems with Meraki is the license. It's a bit of a bugbear with Meraki, and it remains today. So it's an unusual concept compared to the other products in the marketplace, but then it does cause a bit of a nuisance from time to time."

"The products are delayed when arriving in Argentina. These delays can be as long as 6 months, causing the customers to be unhappy."

"Technical support is good but can be improved. I would rate them an eight out of ten."

"It would be useful to have a service management platform integrated within this solution where we can measure the customer experience."

"It's performing well, really well. We don't have any issues. We only have issues if there is a lot of rogue APs in the neighborhood and that not Meraki's fault."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"Both further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Negotiate the deal put in front of you!"

"Pricing could be better."

"The platform is highly priced."

"I don't deal with pricing directly, however, it's my understanding that it is around $40 per unit."

"Since it's been acquired by Cisco, it's an even higher cost."

"We pay licensing fees."

"We are on a SmartNet contract. All of our Cisco products are licensed under one contract. I do not think there are any additional costs."

"The solution's pricing is a little higher."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 36% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 14% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

September 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

September 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.

What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?

Cloud-Based Management: Enables remote network configuration and monitoring.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Offers a seamless interface for managing network activities.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into network performance.
Robust Security: Ensures protection against unauthorized access.
Scalability: Supports large infrastructures without on-site controllers.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without expert requirements.
Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across locations.
High Visibility: Enhances understanding of network activities.
Reliable Connectivity: Ensures constant and stable network access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with simplified management and support.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.

Cisco

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.