Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Arista is ranked #24. Cisco holds a 10.2% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 123 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

14,771 Views
13,294 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

2,341 Views
2,294 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks are competitors in cloud-managed wireless networking solutions. Meraki is favored for its ease of deployment and robust integration, making it appealing for less technical users, while Mojo is recognized for its strong security features, which may be more attractive to those prioritizing network protection.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers comprehensive visibility into network issues via its centralized dashboard, easy deployment, and good device integration capabilities, which appeal to users seeking streamlined management. Mojo Networks, recently acquired by Arista, is distinguished by its advanced security features, like Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (WIPS), guest WiFi capabilities, and robust analytics tools that provide detailed insights into network usage and performance.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could improve on the granularity of data logs and simplify complex rule configurations, as users find these areas challenging. Additionally, its licensing model and customer support have been flagged as problematic, with support seen as sometimes slow. Mojo Networks would benefit from a more intuitive management portal and a more integrated dashboard experience to streamline network monitoring and configuration. Users also desire expanded application security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks provide easy deployment through cloud-based solutions, but the customer service experiences differ. Cisco Meraki's support is generally fast and effective, though inconsistent at times. Mojo Networks is praised for its responsive technical support, making it easier for users to engage with support teams for problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is known for premium pricing that reflects its high-quality performance, though the cost of licensing can be high if licenses expire. Despite this, many users report a positive ROI due to reduced administrative overheads. Mojo Networks offers competitive pricing compared to major brands like Meraki and balances cost with strong features. Its pricing is appealing to those valuing security and ease of use, providing significant ROI by lowering operational expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.7

Number of Reviews

123

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 10.2%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	10.2%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	88.3%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

reviewer2847906

Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Wireless management has become efficient with rich client visibility for troubleshooting

In terms of specific challenges with hybrid environments, I face no issues. I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in my IT environment as pretty efficient for the most part. I would rate it at approximately 80%. I have had some issues with the dashboard itself and as far as switch management goes, but that is not necessarily on the wireless side of things. The wireless side has been quite good. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN optimizes the experience in a hybrid or distributed enterprise setup. My impression of the end-to-end visibility offered by Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is quite good. I function as an admin. What stood out to make me choose Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that I already leverage many products with Cisco. I have Catalyst switching, ACI infrastructure, and use them for my core and edge routers. I would give this review an overall rating of 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the record that is being kept and multiple SSDs."

"This solution is very easy to deploy, install, and to manage."

"Tracking the usage of staff, access points, switches and routers becomes an insanely easy thing and so do producing reports for your Exec team."

"It improved the installation time."

"The most valuable feature is the technology of the security that is offered."

"Meraki is a decent solution for a small company, and we use it in a pretty typical way. We need Teams and Zoom to work, and we need a high level of security because we want our business to remain confidential."

"The best features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN include the excellent reporting; the dashboard reporting aids us a lot in troubleshooting issues, and the platform is very robust."

"The product is very reliable and offers great performance."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"Arista Mojo Wifi has improve stability, visibility anf performance across our enterprise."

"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."

"Arista Wifi (Mojo) is highly scalable with a single pane of glass for management, and its troubleshooting capabilities and deep insights are praiseworthy, which together reduce management efforts and help you achieve a great ROI."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."

"In summary, there is very little that can be improved with this product."

"The technical support is pretty good."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"The product doesn't effectively do its job anymore since some issues crop up in it once you run out of your subscription licensing...Improvements are needed in the licensing part of the tool."

"The technical support from Cisco is good, but they can improve themselves in some areas. Sometimes it takes a while to provide a solution or an answer to our problem."

"I would like to see more cybersecurity. I would like the ability to go in and enhance security."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"They could also add some more controls for guest access. For example, when you have a captive portal, it would be nice to limit the amount of time users can stay connected per day. Right now, you can only configure the splash frequency. And you can set the connection for one hour, but you have to use the billing feature."

"The solution's mobile application and management of dashboards are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The price could be slightly lowered to make it more competitive in the market."

"Our only concern at this stage is how it's licensed."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"The user interface needs improvement to make navigation even more simplistic."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is per unit and it has annual maintenance costs."

"The solution could improve the licensing structure and the price is expensive."

"It's not super expensive and it's not super cheap."

"It is expensive, but it is a good product."

"The price is negotiable."

"The solution is overpriced and more expensive than Hauwei."

"My client has made comments on the price, indicating it is expensive, however you do receive a lot for the money that you did spend on the solution. The price of the annual renewal of the licensing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a little high. We wish the price would drop."

"We pay a yearly license fee for the solution."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 36% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 16% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

November 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

October 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.

What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?

Cloud-Based Management: Enables remote network configuration and monitoring.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Offers a seamless interface for managing network activities.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into network performance.
Robust Security: Ensures protection against unauthorized access.
Scalability: Supports large infrastructures without on-site controllers.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without expert requirements.
Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across locations.
High Visibility: Enhances understanding of network activities.
Reliable Connectivity: Ensures constant and stable network access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with simplified management and support.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.

Cisco

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

November 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.