2021-10-24T11:24:00Z
NC
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 2
  • 211

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless? Which is better and why?

2
PeerSpot user
2 Answers
DG
Tech blogger
Real User
Top 5
2021-11-02T12:25:45Z
Nov 2, 2021

On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are available to ease the deployment of the Cisco wireless network. A small business will now be able to make use of this wireless product without being worried about having to make a massive investment of either time or resources. This peace of mind extends to the actual maintenance of the product as well. Cisco wireless’s network does not require very much in the way of maintenance. It does require occasional upgrades to keep it running smoothly, but other than that, a team tasked with maintaining it has very little to worry about. Organizations of all sizes will be able to benefit from both of these aspects of Cisco wireless’s design.


Cisco wireless provides a very robust service that will continue to run over long periods of time and under heavy usage. Furthermore, the teams that are responsible for assisting users and resolving any potential issues that may arise are highly professional. These are two additional features that make Cisco wireless a valuable product. The wireless service is capable of running for years without any real need for replacements to be made to the hardware.


Although no system is perfect, Cisco’s Wireless network shows that products can still be made to last. Long spans of time can pass without issues arising. When they do, Cisco’s technical support team is well-equipped to help handle it. They respond quickly to inquiries and they are extremely knowledgeable. They bring the kind of professionalism that one would hope to have in a product’s support team.


Aruba Wireless can support many devices and provide the features that one would expect for this type of product. It is relatively cheap when compared to other products like Cisco Wireless. For that relatively cheap price, Aruba offers hardware whose performance can match anything offered by its competitors. It advertises what it can do and follows through with its promises. It is also very easy to configure. However, they do not guide users in different industries through the best practices that they should be employing when using Aruba Wireless.


Conclusion


Cisco Wireless offers an effective service. In terms of cost it is more expensive than Aruba Wireless. They both have a lot to offer. The price tag might just be the deciding factor.

Product comparison that may be of interest to you
CK
User at ISP
User
2021-10-28T04:56:25Z
Oct 28, 2021

Aruba is our choice for our WIFI solution as Aruba has a lot of features that can do the same with Meraki. 


Aruba is saving costs vs Meraki in a long time operation.

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Wireless vs. Cisco Wireless and other solutions. Updated: January 2023.
670,400 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Vinny Govender - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Applications Specialist at bioMérieux
Jul 26, 2022
Hi, I'm working as a Technical Applications Specialist at a Pharma/Biotech company with 10000+ employees. I'm researching to purchase a high-performance Wireless LAN device. Which one of the following products would you recommend: Ubiquiti Unifi Aruba Wireless  Ruckus Wireless Huawei Wireless Thank you in advance!
2 out of 9 answers
AH
IT Admin
Nov 15, 2021
Hi, You can purchase WiFi access points from any of the above vendors. But it must be a commercial access point as in AP a few connect to the limited devices and a few can connect large devices with a single AP. It will totally depend on your work environment and access point signals covering the area. In the hall, AP can cover a large area but there is a concrete wall between two rooms or a corridor then it can down the signal to 50 DBM. So, when deciding on a WIFI/AP keep all these things in mind.
EK
Partner / Owner at Bimel Elektronik Mamuller Paz. Ltd.
Nov 15, 2021
If you want high performance and stability, you should definitely go with Ruckus Wireless.  Ruckus Wireless APs have: - Adaptive antenna technology (called BeamFlex) This technology analyzes different paths to reach the client and electronically turns itself to a directional antenna, choosing the path that gives the best performance to reach each specific client. If the client is mobile or if the environment changes (such as a warehouse) the selection of paths/direction also changes instantly. Transmitting in a directional way allows a good Signal-to-Noise Ratio and also causes less interference for other nearby APs outside the path of the directional transmission. - ChannelFly technology This technology chooses the best channel based on performance rather than background scanning for noise. - Polarization Diversity This technology allows the clients not to lose signal strength when held at different angles (important for mobile devices such as tablets and telephones). - Better receive sensitivity compared to the competitors All these features make Ruckus Wireless a better choice than any other competitor (better performance, better coverage area, more stable and surprise-free communication especially in not so easy conditions such as noise, too many clients, too much traffic).
DS
Network Manager at PHNS
Oct 5, 2021
Hi, I'm working as the Network Manager at a Healthcare Company with 5K+ employees. Currently, I'm researching Aruba Wireless and ExtremeWireless and I'd like to understand the main differences between the two of them. Please assist. Thanks.
See 2 answers
EB
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Oct 4, 2021
Hi @Huthaisa Al Saaideh, @D6B8, @DImo Dimov, @Gassan Armouti ​and @Joris Van den Bergh, Can you share your professional insights with @Danny Stevens?  We appreciate your help.
JV
Team Leader Solution Specialists at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 5, 2021
It also depends on the integration with your LAN network and Network Access Control. Both have campus and cloud-native solutions.  One single pane of glass for all your end devices is very advisable. So be sure to integrate your LAN with your WLAN and NAC, and if possible with your firewall gateway and endpoint security. Aruba Wireless has a very rich feature set and integration possibilities. Extreme has a very high level of automation and easy to deploy virtual services on their SPBM fabric.  So it all depends on your expectations and business case...
Related Articles
MZ
IT Director at Guangdong Technion Institute of Technology
Apr 8, 2021
The wireless network has been one of the critical pillars in Guangdong Technion-Israel Insitute of Technology(GTIIT) since its birth in 2017, connecting well over 75% of different types of mobile devices and shouldering over 90% of network traffic from end-user devices to internal servers or internet resources. The IT Department faces considerable challenges. All staff and students rely on th...
See 1 comment
AA
Technical Consultant at itnet
Apr 8, 2021
WIFI 6 is useless in a BYOD environment, You will not notice any added value. Looking forward to your real production input (not to the marketing)
Product Comparisons
Related Articles
MZ
IT Director at Guangdong Technion Institute of Technology
Apr 8, 2021
HPE (Aruba) Wi-Fi operationalization in Guangdong Technion
The wireless network has been one of the critical pillars in Guangdong Technion-Israel Insitute o...
Download Free Report
Download our FREE report comparing Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless based on reviews, features, and more! Updated: January 2023.
DOWNLOAD NOW
670,400 professionals have used our research since 2012.