We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Basic initial setup is very easy when it comes to a new user on-premise."
"The performance and the application monitor. You can select the applications you want to use and block on your network"
"It has very flexible features."
"The web-based GUI is much simpler to use than similar products by Cisco."
"Support through third party vendors or direct from HPE has been easy to manage. They are very responsive."
"The solution is well designed so you can easily integrate it in an infrastructure network."
"Enterprise wireless LAN solution with good visibility and amazing scalability. Aruba Wireless also offers good technical support."
"If we really want to know where a specific user is connected, it gives us the ability to see that and how that user is actually receiving. We can know the speed and their IP, their MAC address and, most of the time, how much bandwidth they're using per day."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The simplicity is great."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"We need security features to recognize the traffic source and to apply Zero Trust security."
"An area of this product that could use improvement would be the troubleshooting. At times I had to engage Aruba Support which ran some pretty complicated troubleshooting commands. I would not have been able to do with existing CLI documentation."
"There is a lot of information for users about the product, but it needs to be better organized so that solutions are easier to find."
"Access point mounting options could be better."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"Improvements to the GUI, such as being able to search in the Mobility Master, would be nice."
"The user interface could be improved in Aruba Wireless. This would make the setup easier."
"The latest design of their APs removes the console port and requires purchasing an expensive proprietary cable just to access the console."
"The solution is expensive."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The price could be better."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews while Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is ranked 13th in Wireless LAN with 13 reviews. Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4, while Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points writes "Simple, easy to learn, and quick to deploy". Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Huawei Wireless, whereas Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Mist AI and Cloud. See our Aruba Wireless vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
