Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Wireless vs Huawei Wireless comparison

Cisco and Huawei are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Huawei is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Cisco holds a 11.8% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Huawei’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Huawei users who would recommend it.
Cisco Wireless
Read 151 Cisco Wireless reviews
  • 18,506 Views
  • 17,075 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Huawei Wireless
Read 36 Huawei Wireless reviews
  • 5,990 Views
  • 5,227 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Cisco Wireless and Huawei Wireless compete in the enterprise wireless solutions market. Cisco generally has the upper hand due to its advanced features, integration capabilities, and robust support systems.

Features: Cisco Wireless is superior in scalability, security, and integration with existing Cisco products. Notable features include Cisco CleanAir, seamless roaming, and advanced security options. Huawei Wireless, on the other hand, is recognized for its smart antennas, strong reliability, and cost-effectiveness.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Wireless is often criticized for its high costs, complex licensing, and the need for comprehensive technical expertise. Improvements in pricing, licensing clarity, and configuration simplification would be beneficial. Huawei Wireless needs better user support, stability, and scalability, with a focus on SMB solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Wireless supports both on-premise and cloud deployments, offering flexibility for enterprises. Its customer service is well-regarded for detailed support. Huawei Wireless emphasizes ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness in on-premise setups but lacks in detailed post-sale support.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Wireless is expensive, but offers a good long-term ROI due to its feature set and reliability. Huawei Wireless is known for its affordable, competitive pricing, providing an immediate ROI despite having fewer advanced features, making it ideal for cost-sensitive projects.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 830,596 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Wireless
Ranking in Wireless LAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
151
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Huawei Wireless
Ranking in Wireless LAN
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless is 11.8%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huawei Wireless is 5.4%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN
 

Q&A Highlights

SS
Feb 08, 2021
Which wireless controller has maximum client connectivity and high throughput?
Cisco has maximum client connectivity and high throughput.
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Lees - PeerSpot reviewer
Affordable, resilient, and performs better than other solutions in the market
Assurance capabilities must be improved. There should be more Assurance features on the Wireless LAN Controller. A lot of it is bundled into the DNA Center. Having a little more Assurance regarding what the RF Spectrum looks like will be good. Juniper Mist has a lot of analytical data on the dashboard. The customers would be compelled to look at DNA Center as a longer-term and more comprehensive solution if Cisco were to give them an insight into some of the Assurance capabilities that might be available in DNA Center. The tool must provide something like RF Neighbor. It must enable organizations to receive signal strength and signal-to-noise ratio and see how clients perform in their wireless network. It must have a cap. If we want additional functionality to see our entire network, that's where DNA Center fits in.
Read full review
Umer Farooq - PeerSpot reviewer
Customizable and has many unique features, such as encryption, spatial streams, and smart antennas
The initial setup for Huawei Wireless is easy, so it's a nine out of ten for me. It takes six to eight weeks to deploy the product. Initially, as I'm in pre-sales, I generate RFPs and the response when a customer has issued a published tender. I'll check the requirement, and then I'll map it to the Huawei product. I'll then make the Statement of Compliance (SOC) and select the proper model. Next, I'll send the information and document to Huawei for technical vetting. After technical vetting, I'll request Huawei to share information on costs and other vetted documents I need to complete, and once completed, I'll submit the documents. It'll then take approximately ten to fifteen days. Deploying Huawei Wireless requires teamwork because the deployment process involves different people and teams, such as the project manager, post-deployment, and pre-sales teams, to deploy the product completely.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cisco Wireless improves mobility and flexibility. The only case we are working on is with hospitals, focusing on the mobility of doctors within the hospital. Everywhere, doctors need to be connected to the network, even within the operating theater, patient rooms, and even the basement, like the radiology department. As far as the solution goes, the coverage is usually very comprehensive."
"It gave us the ability to view wireless traffic, unwanted devices on the network, and how they affected overall network performance."
"The initial setup is easy. It's fairly quick to deploy."
"It is a reliable and robust solution. Access and Mobility Groups are useful. We don't use anything very fancy."
"Identity PSK helps save SSIDs."
"The installation process is very easy."
"The stability is great. It's very reliable."
"The LAN network conductivity is good."
More Cisco Wireless pros
"At the moment, I only have experience with the on-premise deployment of Huawei Wireless, but the cloud solution looks good on paper. It looks perfect. I can say that Huawei's cybersecurity is very good, stable, and works for long periods. My company has four devices running uptime for more than four years without stopping. I also like that the support for Huawei Wireless is swift, and support does precisely what you require, at least from the point of view of the technical engineer who communicated with Huawei support, as I'm more of a technical sales guy. Good technical support is vital to my company, partners, and customers. My company had this ongoing project with an ISP provider in Bulgaria that bought some routers. Still, the existing equipment was a completely different brand, so this provider wanted to migrate to Huawei Wireless and wanted help while migrating the existing infrastructure to Huawei, so the technical engineer assigned to raise the ticket with Huawei for checking and setting parameters correctly provided feedback about Huawei technical support being good quality-wise and TAT-wise. The technical engineer was also Cisco-certified and Juniper-certified and was not experienced with Huawei equipment. Still, he did mention that the Huawei Wireless router interface was straightforward, and even a person who's new to it would find it easy to configure. Huawei Wireless is user-friendly, which is another pro of the solution. It's easy to manage, and even the program language setting can be done with fewer commands than Juniper and Cisco equipment. Some of the features in Juniper need an external program, and the same features can be found in Huawei Wireless built-in, which I find remarkable."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of Huawei Wireless are WiFi coverage and ease of use."
"The solution offers very good value for money."
"From an implementation perspective, it's easy. I rate it a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup, and ten is an easy setup."
"The solution is easily managed compared to other wireless solutions."
"It is easy to set up."
"Huawei Wireless's most valuable feature is smart antenna, a combination of informative capabilities and advanced technology."
More Huawei Wireless pros
 

Cons

"The pricing of the solution is expensive if you compare it to other competitors."
"The pricing could be better. It could be cheaper."
"The solution could be cheaper and have a better web interface."
"In the next release, I would like to see some AI capability deployed. Other competitors like Mist and Juniper already have it. So, AI features need to be introduced next year."
"The flexibility on the controllers isn't that great."
"Cisco Wireless could improve if they had some kind of social media integration. There is some limitation with social media integration and wireless interaction. They need to add some additional components to their wireless devices to complete the solution or requirements."
"An expensive solution that small companies cannot afford."
"If needs to provide more visibility. It can detect and do it, but as technicians we don't have a lot of visibility into seeing exactly what's happening. It doesn't give us a lot of log information for us to troubleshoot. They probably have additional software you need to purchase to get that kind of information. But I think not all companies can afford additional software to see those kinds of details. So if the wireless controller already had, built-in, those types of things for the technician or wireless engineer, it would be more attractive for the end-user."
More Cisco Wireless cons
"The solution could be easier to use."
"They should include more security features in the solution."
"The scalability could be a bit better."
"The speed could be a bit better."
"Huawei Wireless can improve the signal, sometimes it becomes weak."
"The scalability could be better."
"The stability could be improved."
"Huawei Wireless has a small technical problem. When you use a power injector, it needs to be specially configured for the switch to which it is connected. It tries to take power not from the power injector but from the switch. The funny thing when you look at it is that you have three switches or maybe four or five that are theoretically capable. However, the port on these switches is disabled. When you connect the access point to a power injector, the access point checks for features from the switch, but on this port, the switch doesn't do power. So, the access point changes these features to energy save mode and cuts off some features, especially WiFi 6. It took me two weeks to find out what's going on and how to mitigate this sort of problem. It is very easy to fix. You need to disable LLDP on the port on which you connect the access point to the power injector. Power injectors aren't quite commonly used, but I have 54 access points, and I have used about 27 power injectors. So, about half of the access points were working at reduced speed, not full speed, for two weeks."
More Huawei Wireless cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Because the Cisco architecture is quite complex, you may end up having to add more components and licenses. So, the cost could go up."
"This is an expensive product."
"The licensing system is very rigid. I work for a school and we are just treated like big companies. At some point, there's a limit to what we can do about that."
"However, when you integrate the access point and the controller with the DNAT across multiple sites, you need a DNAT cluster, which is a costly solution. Every site has a controller, and a DNAT cluster is not a good option in a global framework. It's okay for a small office or a few offices. But when you're talking about 500 offices, the cost becomes enormous."
"The price of the solution is fair."
"Cisco Wireless is a little bit expensive when compared to other solutions."
"Cisco is not a cheap solution. Their licensing cost is higher than that for others."
"I rate the tool's pricing a ten out of ten. It is expensive compared to Aruba and Juniper."
More Cisco Wireless pricing and cost advice
"The product has a good price."
"The price of Huawei Wireless is reasonable. The licenses are active, and everything is working fine as per the license agreement."
"I would rate them something, like, eight to nine, on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The price of Huawei Wireless is very good."
"Huawei comes at a cheaper price than competitors like Cisco and Aruba."
"It is very cost-effective."
"The price is good for the solution and there is a license required."
"The platform is less costly than one of its competitors. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."
More Huawei Wireless pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
830,596 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user212721 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 24, 2015
Cisco vs. Aruba Wireless Solutions
Cisco or Aruba Networks? If you are considering wireless access solutions, this is a common question that you are probably asking. You probably have sales people knocking at your door. How do you make sense of all the stories that you are presented with. If you have done any research, you are…
Read full review
 

Answers from the Community

SS
Feb 8, 2021
Feb 8, 2021
Which wireless controller has maximum client connectivity and high throughput?
All are good selections, and this question is difficult to answer without knowing your throughput requirements, as each vendor has multiple models within there series. Personally I recommend looking at Arista Networks’ cognitive Wifi, where controllers are a thing of the past.
2 out of 7 answers
AT
Feb 17, 2020
Hi, It is all dependent on the size of the controllers in question. Though I would suggest getting a cloud base technology so you are limited by any controller and have much better redundancy. Take a look at Arista Cognitive Wireless
Read full answer
IA
Feb 17, 2020
Hi, Every one of the mentioned solutions is good but you need to check the needs which are security since the firms you are working with need protection and tracking of data. For this reason, I recommend: - if you have FortiGate installed then go for Fortinet Wireless since they can be integrated with the Fortigate without buying a controller and they work perfectly together and you will get the advantage of applying rules to the client himself whether mobile or computer, easily managed & monitored, more visibility over your network and incident notifications. If the above doesn't apply then you can go with the best one that fits your budget and security needs which for me doesn't fall on the mentioned solution but to go with ARUBA Instant Access Wireless Solution and the reasons are as such: - Cisco is too much expensive and you got to pay smart support with some complexity in configuration and you need to buy a controller - Ruckus is good but when you want to have the security you need to buy a controller with licenses and it won't give you the security needed since it is just a wireless solution - Huawei is not a stable company since it had many ups and downs and they can reach with you to have all the solutions nearly free so that you install their brand. Whereas Aruba you don't need a controller in the Instant access points and you will get the minimum security with radius integration and what is important a lifetime warranty on the access points. In addition, if the number of access points increased and you want more detailed management and more advanced configurations, you can buy a controller either on-premises or on-cloud with Aruba. The above information is based on my experience with all the solutions and their POC. If you need any more details and consultancy, kindly feel free to contact me. Regards.
Read full answer
See all 7 answers
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
See all answers
Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?
Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...
See all answers
How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?
On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are availabl...
See all answers
Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?
Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...
See all answers
What do you like most about Huawei Wireless?
The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Wireless?
For SMB customers with limited wireless users, Huawei Wireless may not be suitable due to the lack of multiple access points and the need for a centralized SSID. However, for large-capacity custome...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Wireless Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Wireless
Compared 36% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Wireless Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Wireless
Compared 25% of the time
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless Logo
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless
Compared 6% of the time
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Wireless Logo
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Wireless
Compared 4% of the time
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cisco Wireless Logo
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cisco Wireless
Compared 4% of the time
More Cisco Wireless Competitors
D-Link Wireless vs Huawei Wireless Logo
D-Link Wireless vs Huawei Wireless
Compared 25% of the time
Aruba Wireless vs Huawei Wireless Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Huawei Wireless
Compared 16% of the time
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Huawei Wireless Logo
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Huawei Wireless
Compared 14% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Huawei Wireless Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Huawei Wireless
Compared 10% of the time
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Huawei Wireless Logo
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Huawei Wireless
Compared 9% of the time
More Huawei Wireless Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless
January 2025
Cisco Wireless reportDownload Cisco Wireless product report
Buyer's Guide
Huawei Wireless
January 2025
Huawei Wireless reportDownload Huawei Wireless product report
 

Also Known As

Cisco WLAN Controller
Huawei WLAN
 

Learn More

Cisco
Huawei
 

Overview

Cisco Wireless is a comprehensive suite of wireless solutions designed to deliver secure, high-performance connectivity for enterprises of all sizes. Offering a range of access points, controllers, and advanced management tools, Cisco Wireless ensures seamless and reliable network access, enhancing mobility and productivity.

Cisco Wireless solutions provide robust, scalable wireless networks capable of supporting high-density environments and diverse applications. With features such as seamless roaming, advanced security protocols, and detailed analytics, Cisco Wireless addresses the needs of modern businesses. The solutions include the Cisco Catalyst and Aironet series access points, wireless LAN controllers, and the Cisco DNA Center for centralized management and automation.

What are the key features of Cisco Wireless?

  • High-Density Performance: Optimized for environments with a high number of devices, ensuring reliable connectivity and performance.
  • Advanced Security: Incorporates robust security measures such as WPA3, Secure Boot, and segmentation to protect data and devices.
  • Seamless Roaming: Enables uninterrupted connectivity as users move across different areas within the network.
  • Centralized Management: Cisco DNA Center provides a single pane of glass for managing and automating wireless networks, enhancing operational efficiency.
  • Flexible Deployment Options: Supports various deployment models, including on-premises, cloud-managed, and hybrid solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Cisco Wireless?

  • Improved Mobility and Productivity: Users often highlight how Cisco Wireless enhances user mobility and productivity through reliable and consistent connectivity.
  • Scalability: Reviews frequently mention the scalability of Cisco Wireless, making it suitable for growing businesses.
  • Ease of Management: Many users appreciate the centralized management capabilities, which simplify network administration and troubleshooting.
  • Enhanced Security: The advanced security features are often noted for providing peace of mind and compliance with industry standards.
  • User Experience: The overall user experience, including ease of use and seamless integration with other Cisco products, is a common point of praise.

Cisco Wireless solutions are implemented across various industries, including healthcare, education, retail, and manufacturing. In healthcare, they support critical applications like patient monitoring and electronic health records. Educational institutions use Cisco Wireless to provide reliable internet access for students and staff. Retailers benefit from enhanced customer experiences through in-store connectivity, while manufacturers use wireless networks to improve operational efficiency and automation.

Pricing and licensing for Cisco Wireless solutions are typically based on the scale of deployment and specific product selections. Cisco offers various support plans, including 24/7 customer service, technical support, and access to software updates and patches.

In summary, Cisco Wireless provides robust, scalable wireless networking solutions that enhance connectivity, security, and management for diverse enterprise environments.

Huawei WLAN products are compatible with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac standards to establish high-speed, secure, and reliable wireless network connections for indoor and outdoor applications.WLAN products can be used in enterprise offices, schools, hospitals, large shopping malls, exhibition centers, airports, and more.
 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
Anhui Agricultural University (AAU), China Everbright Bank
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless
January 2025
Free Report: Cisco Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
830,596 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.