We performed a comparison between Appian and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."Another advantage of this tool is its reports and records. You can maintain dashboards, layouts. If you with a Java solution, it takes six months time. If you use this tool, you can finish in one or one and a half months' time."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The setup is easy."
"The most valuable features of Appian are the VPN engine, it is fast, lightweight, and easy to set up business rules. Business teams can do it by themselves. That is a very good feature."
"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."
"Compared to other code tools that I've seen, Appian has a more robust rules engine"
"There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"They should provide more flexibility so designers can create a more picture perfect device."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases."
"What could be improved is more on the front end perspective, like the user interface and the mobile application aspect."
"If that had more DevOps capabilities, it would be an excellent product."
"If we could calculate the amount of data that will be realized, it would help us a lot."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 3rd in Process Automation with 57 reviews while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 33rd in Process Automation. Appian is rated 8.4, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.