Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Camunda and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Camunda holds a 27.6% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Camunda
Read 77 Camunda reviews
  • 15,091 Views
  • 10,176 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 5 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 146 Views
  • 68 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Camunda are competing solutions in the BPM market, each with distinct features catering to various enterprise needs. Camunda seems to have the upper hand due to its flexible architecture and lower initial costs, which appeal to innovative tech teams.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS is characterized by its extensive integration capabilities, powerful analytics tools, and robust enterprise features suitable for complex environments. Camunda offers lightweight architecture, ease of collaboration, and developer-friendly tools that facilitate seamless process automation.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could benefit from simplifying its setup process and enhancing its agility to meet the needs of dynamic enterprises. Camunda might aim for improved advanced analytics features, a more intuitive user interface for non-developers, and enriched customer support options for enterprises seeking structured assistance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires a thorough and potentially complex setup, supported by strong technical resources and structured customer service. Camunda's lightweight deployment offers faster implementation and benefits from community support, providing flexibility and prompt assistance.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS comes with higher initial setup costs but delivers substantial value for large enterprises with comprehensive needs. Camunda’s cost-effective entry and rapid deployment present a compelling ROI for organizations focused on significant gains from process optimization.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Camunda vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Process Automation
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
33rd
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 27.6%, up from 27.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.
Read full review
ST
Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing
The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
More Camunda pros
"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
 

Cons

"Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation. More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
More Camunda cons
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."
"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."
"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."
"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."
"Camunda has a free service as well as a commercial service. We are using the free service."
"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."
More Camunda pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
See all answers
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
See all answers
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?
There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?
We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?
I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda Logo
Apache Airflow vs Camunda
Compared 11% of the time
Flowable vs Camunda Logo
Flowable vs Camunda
Compared 10% of the time
Bizagi vs Camunda Logo
Bizagi vs Camunda
Compared 8% of the time
Temporal vs Camunda Logo
Temporal vs Camunda
Compared 8% of the time
IBM BPM vs Camunda Logo
IBM BPM vs Camunda
Compared 7% of the time
More Camunda Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Camunda
April 2025
Camunda reportDownload Camunda product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
April 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
WebSphere BPMS
 

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda
Information not available
IBM
 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Buyer's Guide
Camunda vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
April 2025
Free Report: Camunda vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Camunda vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.