You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Reviews

Name: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4.2 (81 reviews)

Vendor: OpenText

4.2 out of 5

81 reviews
94% willing to recommend

3,036 followers

Start review

What is OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)?

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

Get the OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional), Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad and more!

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is the #4 ranked solution in top Performance Testing Tools and top Load Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is most commonly compared to Apache JMeter: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 70% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 16% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

May 2025

Get the report

Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

HelenSague

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

I do not have any big challenges with LoadRunner. I only have some issues with load generators. It is a very common issue, and I hope it will be resolved in the latest release. For example, when we start to run our tests, users get the message that the load generator exceeded 80% of the CPU utilization. Even when the number of users is less, we get these messages. I am trying to resolve it, but it is not going. It is annoying. It is not a failure, but I hope that it will be resolved. IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.

Read full review

Kulveer Singh

Senior Technical Manager at Amtrak

The challenge lies in the time-consuming manual coding and testing. It takes a while to understand it, repeat it with the managers or a business analyst, and then share the reports with stakeholders, and the whole process takes time. So it would be beneficial for us if there is some kind of a dashboard where you can have different rules. A dashboard with different rules would be beneficial for quick approvals and deployment, reducing the need for extensive meetings and email communication. It could be improved in some areas to support the latest web technologies. For example, LoadRunner could be improved to better support single-page applications (SPAs). Another way to improve LoadRunner would be to add better support for testing SPAs. Now, most people are going for WAV 2.0. Most of the applications are single-page applications where the browser is not refreshing.

Read full review

SamirPatle

Senior Performance Analyst at EPAM Systems

Many times, the scripts are very lengthy, and traffic recording is tough. We're dealing with a huge chunk of data to record the traffic, and what happens is that LoadRunner takes a lot of time post-script validation to create its script after recording traffic from Ruckus. Sometimes, it gets hung because of the high resource utilization, and we have to re-record again if the requests are huge. So, LoadRunner experiences high resource utilization. Even though we have machines with higher configurations, I've observed this behavior. Heavy traffic recording results in the tool hanging. So heavy traffic recording makes the tool slow. To prepare a script, OpenText LoadRunner Professional slows down.

Read full review

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) mindshare

Product category:

As of June 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 13.9%, up from 13.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Performance Testing Tools	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad	Jun 19, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Apache JMeter	3.9	21.6%	87%	94 interviews Add to research
Tricentis NeoLoad	4.1	16.2%	95%	65 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering excels with powerful scripting tools, supporting diverse protocols and technologies. Users highlight its comprehensive analysis and flexible scripting capabilities. The platform effectively simulates multiple users, provides extensive protocol support, and offers real-time performance stats. Integration with various systems and user-friendly features enhance its utility. Its reporting mechanism and auto-correlation features are praised for efficiency and comprehensiveness. Users appreciate the tool's adaptability and detailed output, making it highly valuable.

"I would definitely recommend OpenText LoadRunner Professional to other users."
"It uses high-level languages like Java, CVC, and CCL."
"One of the most valuable features of LoadRunner Professional is the wide range of protocols it supports, especially the web user v user types."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) faces challenges with ease-of-use, high pricing, integration, and reporting. Users find script creation complex, while the tool's high cost and licensing fees remain barriers. The reporting is seen as outdated, demanding more modern features. Integration with modern technologies, cloud systems, and better real-time monitoring is essential. Users also seek improved support for agile development and more effective mobile and network testing.

"I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible; if we get a chance to work with that, then we can check how much it helps."
"The pricing could be lower."
"Technical support needs to be faster, and the pricing should be more competitive."

ROI

Users find positive ROI with OpenText Professional Performance Engineering LoadRunner Professional due to its ability to detect and prevent performance issues. Long-term use shows cost efficiency through reduced downtime and improved response times. Although costly, the ROI becomes evident when avoiding production outages and through decreased manual effort. It demonstrates value by enhancing customer experience and minimizing support costs. ROI is enhanced when used extensively, though a careful approach is necessary to manage expenses.

Pricing

OpenText LoadRunner Professional is generally considered expensive compared to other tools like NeoLoad and LoadNinja. Licensing costs vary based on user numbers and protocol types, with a detailed model that can become costly for comprehensive usage. Despite higher costs, it provides scalability, stability, and comprehensive support. Many enterprises find value in its professional and cloud options, although the high price often prompts careful consideration. A free community edition is available, limited to 50 users.

"The solution's pricing is expensive."
"The pricing model, especially when involving partners, could use some improvement."
"The price is a bit on the high side, but it is still affordable."

Popular Use Cases

LoadRunner Professional is primarily utilized for load and performance testing across diverse environments. Users leverage it to simulate realistic scenarios to identify bottlenecks and optimize system performance. It supports multiple protocols, aiding testing for web applications, REST-based APIs, and enterprise networks. Users span industries like banking, automotive, and hospitality, employing LoadRunner Professional to evaluate response times, ensure optimal service levels, and facilitate integration testing with varied applications.

Service and Support

Many find OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) customer service satisfactory, with positive interactions and fast response times. Tech support receives mixed feedback—some users praise its thoroughness and knowledge, while others report challenges, slow response times, and reliance on community resources for quick solutions. The effectiveness often varies based on the support representative encountered. Overall, users appreciate the available resources and knowledge bank but note there is room for improvement, particularly in response efficiency.

Deployment

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) setup is often straightforward due to its standalone nature and automated wizards. Common challenges involve firewall permissions and ensuring connectivity between load generators and the controller. Many users find the process easy, taking 15 to 45 minutes. IT experience aids installation, but complexity increases when involving additional infrastructure or specific organizational requirements. The setup is rated highly by experienced users despite occasional difficulties.

Scalability

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is highly scalable for many, handling significant user loads and supporting multiple protocols. Some experience issues with memory-heavy features and specific license limitations, while others find it satisfactory with ample licensing and configuration options. Organizations appreciate the flexibility in scaling capabilities but note that enterprise versions may offer more manageability, especially when demands increase. Performance assessments vary, though many rate scalability optimistically with diverse testing environments.

Stability

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is quite stable with minimal issues. Many users report consistent stability and reliability, mentioning rare crashes during long tests or high data loads. Several users highlight the tool’s maturity and improvements over time, rating its stability highly. Although minor bugs are noted, they are often manageable. Some users experience stability challenges with specific applications, but generally find LoadRunner Professional handles multi-user scenarios effectively, surpassing tools like JMeter and K6.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Media Company

Educational Organization

Transportation Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Consumer Goods Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Non Profit

Logistics Company

Hospitality Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Legal Firm

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Performing Arts

Marketing Services Firm

Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) was previously known as Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner.