IBM Resilient vs Swimlane comparison

Read 10 Swimlane reviews

1,359 Views
1,305 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Resilient

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

IBM Resilient and Swimlane are competing in the cybersecurity automation domain. IBM Resilient seems to have the upper hand in support and integration, while Swimlane is favored for its robust features, offering a competitive advantage in functionality.

Features: IBM Resilient provides comprehensive threat intelligence integration, automated response capabilities, and strong support for security operations. Swimlane offers flexible automation workflows, highly customizable dashboards, and advanced analytics, giving it an edge for those seeking tailored solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Resilient is notable for seamless deployment and responsive customer service. Swimlane provides straightforward deployment with extensive customization and proactive support, benefiting complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Resilient involves a higher setup cost but substantial ROI through efficient threat management and integration. Swimlane offers competitive pricing for faster ROI with customizable tools and efficient automation, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane Report (Updated: September 2025).

IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,029 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Resilient

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Incident Response (3rd)

Swimlane

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Powered Security Automation (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of IBM Resilient is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Swimlane is 3.1%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Swimlane	3.1%
IBM Resilient	1.9%
Other	95.0%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Usman Bhatti

Senior Officer Security Operations Center at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility

Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.

Read full review

Srikanth Nuthalapati

Software Engineering Manager at Deloitte

Great support, scalable, and easier to code

The stability of the solution has room for improvement. I would like Swimlane to provide a single space where we can go to code, build, and automate. Where we have a provision to create tables, playbooks, and tables to produce results, connect all the dots, and make the flow automated. This would make it much easier to navigate than having to jump to different places. I would like to have a single button to click that would start me on the journey of creating my own code from the ground up, from the workflow algorithm to the automation process. This would be simpler than what I had with Splunk Phantom, where I had to piece things together and connect the dots to get the full picture. With this new feature, I could create the full picture with just one button click.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is reliable in our usage."

"IBM Resilient is scalable."

"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."

"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."

"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."

"The integration with IBM SIM and the ability to block users during brute force attacks are particularly effective."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."

More IBM Resilient pros

"Swimlane enables two SOC analysts to work efficiently as much as ten analysts would without Swimlane, which translates to significant manpower savings."

"The technical support from Swimlane is very good."

"Our primary goal was to reduce analyst time, and we have been successful in that."

"On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine."

"Swimlane saves us 80 to 90 percent of our time by quickly helping us design the journey and efficiently passing information to various components."

"We are using it for a SOAR platform at a Cyber Security company which is MSSP."

"Swimlane is a very effective way to represent workflows involving multiple users."

"The biggest advantage of Swimlane for us is that it saves time, which in turn helps us in cost-saving."

More Swimlane pros

Cons

"Its price needs improvement."

"What could make IBM Resilient better is if IBM increased the number of built-in integrations with different products from other vendors or third-party products."

"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."

"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."

"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."

"The product needs a bit more development."

"Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution."

More IBM Resilient cons

"One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers."

"Swimlane's search bar is not working effectively, and there is no option to differentiate between two cases at the same time."

"I would like to see improvements in the minor bugs that occur with each update, as some features might have issues."

"Swimlane is not scalable because it is not exposed. Currently, it's a manual component that requires configuration through coding."

"The initial setup and deployment are complex."

"I would prefer to have more colors added to represent different risks or notations, which can be used for the prioritization of risks and the significance of information."

"There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates."

"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."

More Swimlane cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the product is quite high."

"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."

"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."

"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."

"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."

"It is very expensive."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."

More IBM Resilient pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Resilient?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?

I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.

What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?

Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.

What needs improvement with Swimlane?

One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers. We have recently seen new products such as Tines and Blink Ops coming into the market, where a pers...

What is your primary use case for Swimlane?

We are using Swimlane for automation purposes and security orchestration. We are using Swimlane's Playbook Automation. One of the major playbooks that we use in Swimlane is for phishing email autom...

What advice do you have for others considering Swimlane?

I would rate Swimlane a seven out of ten as a product.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs IBM Resilient

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 9% of the time

Proofpoint Threat Response vs IBM Resilient

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Resilient Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 21% of the time

Tines vs Swimlane

Compared 21% of the time

Torq vs Swimlane

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 8% of the time

More Swimlane Competitors

Product Reports

Download IBM Resilient product report

IBM Resilient

October 2025

Download Swimlane product report

October 2025

Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

IBM

Swimlane is a leader in security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). By automating time-intensive, manual processes and operational workflows and delivering powerful, consolidated analytics, real time dashboards and reporting from across your security infrastructure, Swimlane maximizes the incident response capabilities of over-burdened and understaffed security operations.

Swimlane was founded to deliver scalable innovative and flexible security solutions to organizations struggling with alert fatigue, vendor proliferation and chronic staffing shortages. Swimlane is at the forefront of the growing market for security automation and orchestration solutions that automate and organize security processes in repeatable ways to get the most out of available resources and accelerate incident response.

Sample Customers

Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds

LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta