Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is QuickBase?

Featured QuickBase reviews

QuickBase mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of QuickBase in the Rapid Application Development Software category stands at 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
QuickBase2.2%
Microsoft Power Apps9.0%
ServiceNow6.2%
Other82.6%
Rapid Application Development Software

PeerResearch reports based on QuickBase reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryRapid Application Development SoftwareMar 13, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 13, 2026Download
ComparisonQuickBase vs Microsoft Power AppsMar 13, 2026Download
ComparisonQuickBase vs ServiceNowMar 13, 2026Download
ComparisonQuickBase vs Oracle Application Express (APEX)Mar 13, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
ServiceNow4.36.2%91%225 interviewsAdd to research
Appian4.25.0%95%64 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business85
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise97
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Construction Company
6%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Performing Arts
5%
Transportation Company
5%
Government
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Legal Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Non Profit
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
 
QuickBase Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Software Test Engineer at Roche4.5I've used QuickBase for five years to manage projects and inventory efficiently, benefiting from its automation, ease of use, and intuitive interface, though some integrations are complex and pricing could be more competitive.
Data Entry Specialist at Pfizer4.5I've used QuickBase for over five years to streamline workflows, cut manual tasks, and improve project visibility, saving us millions. It's easy to use and highly customizable, though table limits and cost could be improved.
Lead & Initiatives Director, Strategic Projects at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees3.5I’ve used QuickBase for seven years to replace spreadsheets with quick, stable, scalable workflow apps that reduce input errors and improve compliance and reporting. It saves significant time and enables nontechnical users, though support is just fine; overall, 7/10.
Director at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees4.5I've used QuickBase for three years to build custom apps that streamline workflows, especially replacing inefficient email processes, and it's saved time, reduced errors, and boosted productivity without needing customer support or switching from another solution.
Scrum Master at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees4.5I used QuickBase to build a low-code procurement intake workflow, centralizing requests and reducing errors and follow-ups versus email. Customizable forms captured varied PO data and improved iteratively. I wished for built-in dashboards to track request status. I rate it 9/10.
Head of Quality & Supply-Chain at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees4.0I used QuickBase for ERP/MRP and MES tasks, valuing its customization, reporting, and analytics that create a single source of truth and improve collaboration. It’s stable and scalable, but adoption would benefit from clearer training and internal experts.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0I use Quick Base for management as a no-code, low-code content management system. It stores data and publishes pages effectively, though its complex user interface and limited API capabilities are drawbacks. I've also considered Salesforce and other similar platforms.
Data Analyst at Global Value Web4.5QuickBase is easy to learn and useful for diverse industries due to its dynamic forms and backend automation. However, its rising costs based on user activity may limit its adoption compared to alternatives like Microsoft PowerApps.