"What I found most valuable in Mendix is that it's very much suitable for mobile apps such as native Android or IOS supported mobile apps. The multiple features of the platform are very, very attractive and very popular. Mendix has technical features such as microflows and nanoflows. You can also access data models in the platform. These are the features that are very, very strong in Mendix. I got my hands dirty on other low-code platforms, but I have not seen such strong features in them compared to the microflows, nanoflows, and data model access that are in Mendix, including creating and integration. The platform has out-of-the-box adapters or out-of-the-box-connectors that you can integrate with different interface applications such as SAP, Salesforce, Oracle EBS, etc."
"It is stable."
"There is a free version of the solution you can use."
"You can scale the solution."
"The features that I have found most valuable with Mendix are its business process management and its minimal low code, both from an interface perspective and from a process perspective."
"We find it intuitive and easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable features of Mendix are the drag and drop functions, the data entities, domain models, and all the related features."
"It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us."
"Mendix needs to think about itself offering machine learning and artificial intelligence."
"You need experienced programmers and developers to understand this solution."
"My understanding is that, if you are not using the free version, it is very expensive."
"Mendix is slightly less scalable than I'd like."
"An improvement I would like to see is the ability to version manage independent modules. Their version management for software repositories must be better. It's good and you can do it, but it needs work."
"There are not enough developers who are using Mendix. The knowledge base available online and in the market is not as rich as other competitors."
"Mendix could improve by allowing the customization of different programming languages, such as Python and C++."
"There's no direct tech support."
"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."
Mendix is ranked 6th in Rapid Application Development Software with 14 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 20th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Mendix is rated 8.0, while QuickBase is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Mendix writes "Low-code/no-code and has microflows, nanoflows, and data model access features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "A low-code platform for creating apps quickly and connecting work activities, but it needs a modern UI and better connectivity with other platforms". Mendix is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, OutSystems, Appian, Pega BPM and Zoho Creator, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, ServiceNow, OutSystems, Appian and Oracle Application Express (APEX).
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
