We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Of all of the solutions I evaluated, it was the easiest to use and deploy."
"Can design apps quickly and can connect to any database."
"Microsoft PowerApps allows you to simplify business processes and user experience. You can also create responsive applications and canvas apps through this solution. It's an easy to scale, stable, and low-code solution."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"It allows us to provide all the information in one single place."
"Power Automate has been the most valuable feature."
"We get feedback on a real-time basis, which is actually very useful for us."
"I like the containerization of Azure."
"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."
"Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed)."
"There's a lot of stability in QuickBase...I really appreciate the processing part of QuickBase, especially considering how we're able to get information in real time instead of having to wait."
"The product is easy to use."
"We have made good use of the ability in QuickBase to add multiple apps for various departments and purposes, while some apps are shared."
"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."
"It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments."
"I am impressed with the product's automation which makes everything easy."
"It is not enough user friendly. It also doesn't integrate very well with SQL Server."
"PowerApps is still a bit new compared to a slightly more mature product such as OutSystems."
"The product could be improved by making it a production application and enabling the export of apps."
"I would like to see more improvement, for example, in direct collaboration."
"We're not in production yet, so we're still working through some issues."
"This tool doesn't have an internal database. It only relies on the data layer of Microsoft Cloud."
"The stability of this solution could be better."
"In terms of workflow automation, I believe that capabilities for creating the entire business process are required, or, at the very least, the option to model the business process, define complex business events, handle them, and route them to appropriate business stakeholders."
"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."
"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."
"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."
". For example, we need a third-party to create and save a document in PDF, MS Word, or MS Excel format. The document saving capability is probably the feature that we most often have to procure from an outside provider."
"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."
"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."
"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."
"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 16th in Rapid Application Development Software with 72 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Mendix, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Appian and ServiceNow Now Platform, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Oracle Fusion Service, Sales Creatio, OutSystems, Mendix and ServiceNow. See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. QuickBase report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.