GitHub CoPilot vs QuickBase comparison

GitHub and Quickbase are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2, while Quickbase is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7. GitHub holds a 5.6% mindshare in RADS, compared to Quickbase’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 27 GitHub CoPilot reviews

2,364 Views
2,175 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

2,143 Views
999 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

QuickBase and GitHub CoPilot operate in the software development and automation category. GitHub CoPilot has the upper hand due to its focus on reducing coding time and increasing productivity, which provides significant value for developers.

Features: QuickBase offers a low-code platform that provides ease of app development without extensive coding knowledge, real-time data processing, and robust API integration. Its strength lies in customizability for business applications. GitHub CoPilot enhances coding efficiency through auto-complete functionalities, code generation, and test case creation, making it ideal for developers seeking to accelerate their coding workflows.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase could improve its mobile applications, enhance cloud storage integration, and update its user interface. There's a need for better integration with Microsoft 365. GitHub CoPilot needs more accurate code suggestions, improved stability across development environments, and better user control over its activation for enhanced context awareness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase's public cloud availability and excellent customer service receive high praise for responsiveness. GitHub CoPilot offers flexible deployment, including on-premises. Customer interaction primarily occurs through technical support channels, with both platforms noted for effective assistance, though QuickBase's proactive engagement stands out.

Pricing and ROI: QuickBase's pricing depends on user count and storage, typically higher but delivering substantial ROI through productivity enhancements. GitHub CoPilot has a flat fee for individual users and is part of GitHub Enterprise licenses. Despite perceived costs, its productivity benefits justify the investment, especially for enterprise users. Both solutions are seen as valuable investments, with QuickBase streamlining workflows and GitHub CoPilot boosting development efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub CoPilot offers significant ROI with cost savings and productivity boosts, though perceptions vary by project and user.

Sentiment score

7.1

QuickBase delivers significant financial benefits by reducing costs, increasing productivity, improving efficiency, and enhancing business visibility.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.5

GitHub CoPilot support varies, with mixed user experiences; documentation and community assistance are often used over direct contact.

Sentiment score

7.8

QuickBase customer service excels in quick technical support with extensive resources, despite limited weekend support and occasional delays.

With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at valuelabs LLP

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub CoPilot is praised for high scalability, supporting hundreds of users, though sometimes faces performance issues under heavy traffic.

Sentiment score

7.7

QuickBase is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth in users and data, with strong support for expanding applications.

With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Quick Base has high potential to scale.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at valuelabs LLP

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.6

GitHub CoPilot is praised for functionality despite stability issues, with reliability improving and suggestions for proxy handling improvements.

Sentiment score

7.8

QuickBase is stable with minor disruptions, rated highly by users for reliability and timely maintenance communication.

In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs accuracy, integration, stability, and affordability, plus broader language support and improved user control for better engagement.

QuickBase requires better customization, UI, mobile experience, improved reporting, integrations, security, formulas, training, APIs, and cost management.

There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at valuelabs LLP

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Setup Cost

GitHub Copilot offers free and paid versions with flexible pricing starting at $10, rated affordable by users.

Enterprise buyers appreciate QuickBase's flexible pricing, but costs rise with users; negotiating tailored solutions is advised for large enterprises.

They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Pricing could be cheaper.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at valuelabs LLP

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot boosts productivity with code suggestions, auto-completion, and multi-language support, enhancing efficiency and rapid development.

QuickBase provides code-free app creation, customization, and efficient data management, enhancing operational efficiency with PaaS capabilities and API integrations.

Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

This provides a unified solution without needing different databases or pipelines.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at valuelabs LLP

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

QuickBase

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (12th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration

In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Read full review

Daniel Ream

Director of Estimating at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable

I would highly recommend working closely with QuickBase and taking advantage of their subcontractors who specialize in building QuickBase apps. QuickBase does a great job of connecting potential users with these subcontractors. However, I would also advise tempering expectations and being aware that building and customizing applications in QuickBase takes time. It is a user-driven platform, so it requires investment and effort to create meaningful solutions. I would rate QuickBase a ten out of ten. I believe that if implemented properly, QuickBase can provide immense value to any organization. It can be used for various purposes such as managing purchase orders, tracking change orders, and monitoring project metrics. By using QuickBase as a central hub, it becomes a reliable and trustworthy source for project-related information. This ability to consolidate and organize data makes it an invaluable tool. Moreover, any solution that helps transform information from individual knowledge into a structured database is undoubtedly a worthwhile investment.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

76%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change. The pricing aligns with other AI agents like Chargebee and Anthropic Cloud. The ability to switch between m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 36% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 9% of the time

Claude vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 30% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 22% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 14% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 6% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

April 2025

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

April 2025

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase

April 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.