GitHub CoPilot vs QuickBase comparison

GitHub and Quickbase are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while Quickbase is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. GitHub holds a 4.7% mindshare in RADS, compared to Quickbase’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 31 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,494 Views
2,921 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

2,015 Views
1,350 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

QuickBase and GitHub CoPilot operate in the software development and automation category. GitHub CoPilot has the upper hand due to its focus on reducing coding time and increasing productivity, which provides significant value for developers.

Features: QuickBase offers a low-code platform that provides ease of app development without extensive coding knowledge, real-time data processing, and robust API integration. Its strength lies in customizability for business applications. GitHub CoPilot enhances coding efficiency through auto-complete functionalities, code generation, and test case creation, making it ideal for developers seeking to accelerate their coding workflows.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase could improve its mobile applications, enhance cloud storage integration, and update its user interface. There's a need for better integration with Microsoft 365. GitHub CoPilot needs more accurate code suggestions, improved stability across development environments, and better user control over its activation for enhanced context awareness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase's public cloud availability and excellent customer service receive high praise for responsiveness. GitHub CoPilot offers flexible deployment, including on-premises. Customer interaction primarily occurs through technical support channels, with both platforms noted for effective assistance, though QuickBase's proactive engagement stands out.

Pricing and ROI: QuickBase's pricing depends on user count and storage, typically higher but delivering substantial ROI through productivity enhancements. GitHub CoPilot has a flat fee for individual users and is part of GitHub Enterprise licenses. Despite perceived costs, its productivity benefits justify the investment, especially for enterprise users. Both solutions are seen as valuable investments, with QuickBase streamlining workflows and GitHub CoPilot boosting development efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.4

GitHub CoPilot enhances productivity, reduces costs by up to 40%, and improves ROI, especially for standardized tasks.

Sentiment score

7.1

QuickBase delivers significant financial benefits by reducing costs, increasing productivity, improving efficiency, and enhancing business visibility.

A lot of time is saved using GitHub CoPilot because the PR review process used to take two to three days, but now it takes about two to three minutes to analyze the complete PR, get context, and give the rating.

Uday Boya

Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP

Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.9

GitHub CoPilot's support is generally satisfactory, with valuable community support but needs improvement in onboarding and response times.

Sentiment score

7.8

QuickBase customer service excels in quick technical support with extensive resources, despite limited weekend support and occasional delays.

With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Whenever there's a downtime of GitHub CoPilot or any issue with login or plugins, customer support is good enough to solve those issues.

Uday Boya

Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP

GitHub technical support is excellent.

Majd Alasfar

AppSec engineer at EastNets Holding Ltd.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

GitHub CoPilot is praised for its scalability, effective user support, and ease of license acquisition, with room for enterprise enhancements.

Sentiment score

7.7

QuickBase is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth in users and data, with strong support for expanding applications.

It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

Multiple people using it get a lot of immediate and exact responses useful for fixing issues, debugging, automating, or enhancing features.

Uday Boya

Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP

With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Quick Base has high potential to scale.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

GitHub CoPilot is largely stable with minor glitches, mostly consistent but occasionally disrupted, especially in complex setups.

Sentiment score

7.8

QuickBase is stable with minor disruptions, rated highly by users for reliability and timely maintenance communication.

In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs improvements in accuracy, context awareness, language support, IDE integration, UI features, and automation capabilities.

QuickBase requires better customization, UI, mobile experience, improved reporting, integrations, security, formulas, training, APIs, and cost management.

Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Setup Cost

GitHub CoPilot offers free individual access and enterprise plans from $18-$20 per user, with negotiable pricing.

Enterprise buyers appreciate QuickBase's flexible pricing, but costs rise with users; negotiating tailored solutions is advised for large enterprises.

They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Pricing could be cheaper.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot enhances productivity with context-aware suggestions, multi-language support, and seamless IDE integration for efficient coding.

QuickBase provides code-free app creation, customization, and efficient data management, enhancing operational efficiency with PaaS capabilities and API integrations.

It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour.

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

Context awareness, inline autocompletions, rapid code prototyping, Agentic mode, and availability in multiple language IDEs are the best features of GitHub CoPilot.

Uday Boya

Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

One of the valuable features of Quick Base is its ability to function as a content management system without the need for SQL.

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

QuickBase

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (13th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	4.7%
QuickBase	1.9%
Other	93.4%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages

Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Read full review

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Empowers content management and application creation without SQL

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

University

Comms Service Provider

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 19% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 9% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 6% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

January 2026

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

January 2026

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.