No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo

Top 10 Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Alternatives

Vendor: Mimecast
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Cloudflare One, and Cisco Umbrella. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Mimecast Advanced Email Security surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat protection, advanced impersonation detection, and comprehensive data leak prevention, ensuring unparalleled email security with smart intelligence and seamless integration capabilities.

Mimecast Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Mimecast, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
4.2 out of 5
Mimecast excels in archiving and remediation with a strong emphasis on filtering and phishing prevention. In comparison, Microsoft Defender provides seamless integration and ease of use within Microsoft environments, making it ideal for organizations seeking robust protection with integrated Microsoft service benefits.
Download Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a straightforward setup process, whereas Microsoft Defender for Office 365 incorporates a more involved initial configuration. Users note Mimecast for its simplicity and Defender for its comprehensive setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a straightforward setup process, whereas Microsoft Defender for Office 365 incorporates a more involved initial configuration. Users note Mimecast for its simplicity and Defender for its comprehensive setup options.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
Mimecast Advanced Email Security excels in email archiving, spam filtering, and Microsoft 365 integration, appealing to those prioritizing email protection despite its cost. In comparison, Cloudflare One provides strong DDoS protection and competitive pricing, ideal for buyers seeking cost-efficient, scalable security solutions.
Download Cloudflare One vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a higher setup cost, while Cloudflare One offers a more budget-friendly option. This highlights the cost-effectiveness of Cloudflare One compared to Mimecast for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a higher setup cost, while Cloudflare One offers a more budget-friendly option. This highlights the cost-effectiveness of Cloudflare One compared to Mimecast for initial setup.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Umbrella provides DNS-based security, facilitating secure browsing without needing extensive hardware. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers comprehensive email threat management. Cisco gives flexibility in deployment, while Mimecast focuses on premium email protection and advanced threat management, though priced higher.
Download Cisco Umbrella vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is competitive with efficient integration, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers a straightforward setup process. The pricing structures highlight distinct advantages, focusing on different aspects of value and deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is competitive with efficient integration, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers a straightforward setup process. The pricing structures highlight distinct advantages, focusing on different aspects of value and deployment.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Proofpoint Email Protection
4.2 out of 5
Proofpoint excels in phishing and attack prevention with strong customization, while Mimecast integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 for archiving. In comparison, Mimecast offers a user-friendly interface, whereas Proofpoint can enhance integration and reduce false positives. Pricing remains significant for both products.
Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. Proofpoint Email Protection Report
Proofpoint Email Protection offers a higher setup cost compared to Mimecast Advanced Email Security, which has a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Proofpoint Email Protection offers a higher setup cost compared to Mimecast Advanced Email Security, which has a more budget-friendly setup option.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Abnormal Security
4.7 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Abnormal Security
4.7 out of 5
Mimecast excels in integration capabilities with Microsoft 365, offering advanced filtering, sandboxing, and email archiving. In comparison, Abnormal Security emphasizes AI-driven features, enhancing security through auto-remediation and seamless API integrations, streamlining user experience and effectively reducing email threats.
Download Abnormal Security vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers lower setup costs compared to Abnormal Security, which has higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers lower setup costs compared to Abnormal Security, which has higher initial expenses.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Kiteworks offers secure file sharing and email encryption with an intuitive interface. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security excels in email threat protection, including anti-phishing. Kiteworks appeals to budget-conscious organizations, while Mimecast suits those prioritizing comprehensive email security despite its higher cost.
Download Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Kiteworks setup cost is moderate, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security tends to be higher, reflecting a difference in cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiteworks setup cost is moderate, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security tends to be higher, reflecting a difference in cost structure.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Barracuda Email Protection
4.3 out of 5
Mimecast provides robust email security with sandboxing and phishing protection, appealing for its Microsoft 365 integration. In comparison, Barracuda excels in ease of use and competitive pricing, offering effective malware blocking and AI-powered impersonation protection, suiting budget-conscious organizations.
Download Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers a straightforward setup at a moderate cost, while Barracuda Email Protection requires a higher initial investment. Distinct cost differences highlight varying budget allocations for setup between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers a straightforward setup at a moderate cost, while Barracuda Email Protection requires a higher initial investment. Distinct cost differences highlight varying budget allocations for setup between these solutions.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Barracuda Email Security Gateway
4.0 out of 5
Barracuda provides user-friendly spam and virus protection with seamless Active Directory integration. In comparison, Mimecast offers advanced threat protection, including sandboxing and email filtering. Barracuda is ideal for ease of use, while Mimecast excels in sophisticated threat defense and detailed archiving.
Download Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Barracuda Email Security Gateway has a straightforward setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security involves a higher initial expense. The simpler implementation of Barracuda contrasts with the complex configuration of Mimecast, highlighting a key pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Email Security Gateway has a straightforward setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security involves a higher initial expense. The simpler implementation of Barracuda contrasts with the complex configuration of Mimecast, highlighting a key pricing difference.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
IRONSCALES
4.6 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
IRONSCALES
4.6 out of 5
Mimecast Advanced Email Security excels in email threat filtering but faces challenges with admin interface complexity. In comparison, IRONSCALES's AI-driven detection and automated response offer seamless Microsoft 365 integration and effective threat resolution, making it ideal for those seeking advanced phishing protection and mobile accessibility.
Download IRONSCALES vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security is known for its straightforward initial setup cost, while IRONSCALES may involve a higher cost at onboarding. This highlights significant differences in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security is known for its straightforward initial setup cost, while IRONSCALES may involve a higher cost at onboarding. This highlights significant differences in initial investment between the two solutions.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Trellix Collaboration Security
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Collaboration Security focuses on automation and real-time responses, appealing to businesses needing cloud integration. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers effective sandboxing and threat remediation, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive email security and compatibility with existing platforms like Microsoft 365.
Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. Trellix Collaboration Security Report
Trellix Collaboration Security involves a moderate setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security's setup cost is low. Trellix provides broader collaboration features, whereas Mimecast focuses on comprehensive email security measures.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Collaboration Security involves a moderate setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security's setup cost is low. Trellix provides broader collaboration features, whereas Mimecast focuses on comprehensive email security measures.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
TitanHQ SpamTitan
4.5 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
TitanHQ SpamTitan
4.5 out of 5
SpamTitan offers robust email categorization and daily management reports, proving effective for spam control. In comparison, Mimecast excels with URL protection and advanced sandboxing, making it suitable for threat remediation. Both cater to varied deployment needs, assisting organizations in different security priorities.
Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan Report
TitanHQ SpamTitan typically requires an initial setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security often offers a similar setup structure. The pricing comparison highlights differences in setup cost and structural approach.
View comparison
Pricing
TitanHQ SpamTitan typically requires an initial setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security often offers a similar setup structure. The pricing comparison highlights differences in setup cost and structural approach.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Sophos Email
4.1 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Sophos Email
4.1 out of 5
Mimecast Advanced Email Security facilitates seamless Microsoft 365 integration, offering premium features like excellent email security and link scanning. In comparison, Sophos Email excels in AI-driven protection and provides competitive pricing with a more flexible licensing model.
Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. Sophos Email Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Sophos Email offers a lower setup expense, highlighting a key pricing discrepancy between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Sophos Email offers a lower setup expense, highlighting a key pricing discrepancy between the two solutions.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Fortinet FortiMail Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiMail Cloud provides competitive pricing and strong integration capabilities, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers needing seamless integration. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers premium, comprehensive features, ideal for those prioritizing advanced threat protection despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiMail Cloud vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Fortinet FortiMail Cloud typically involves lower setup costs, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses. In contrast, Mimecast Advanced Email Security may have higher initial expenses, positioning itself with more comprehensive features and integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiMail Cloud typically involves lower setup costs, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses. In contrast, Mimecast Advanced Email Security may have higher initial expenses, positioning itself with more comprehensive features and integration capabilities.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Google Vault
4.4 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Google Vault
4.4 out of 5
Google Vault integrates well with Google Workspace, focusing on compliance through strong e-discovery and archiving. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security excels in security with features like threat protection and encryption, offering flexibility in deployment and comprehensive customer service to ensure robust email protection.
Download Google Vault vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Google Vault requires minimal setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a higher initial setup fee, highlighting a significant difference in startup expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Vault requires minimal setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a higher initial setup fee, highlighting a significant difference in startup expenses between the two solutions.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Hornetsecurity 365 Total Protection
4.7 out of 5
Mimecast Advanced Email Security delivers extensive email filtering and threat protection appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking solid ROI. In comparison, Hornetsecurity 365 Total Protection integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and offers enhanced compliance, attracting those prioritizing sophisticated features and deployment ease.
Download Hornetsecurity 365 Total Protection vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security involves a lower setup cost compared to Hornetsecurity 365 Total Protection, highlighting an economic advantage for users considering upfront expenses. Hornetsecurity offers a more extensive protection suite, which may justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security involves a lower setup cost compared to Hornetsecurity 365 Total Protection, highlighting an economic advantage for users considering upfront expenses. Hornetsecurity offers a more extensive protection suite, which may justify its higher setup cost.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
KerioConnect
3.6 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
KerioConnect
3.6 out of 5
KerioConnect appeals with unified communication tools and cost-effectiveness, ideal for small to medium businesses seeking simplicity. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers robust threat protection and sophisticated features, suiting organizations prioritizing comprehensive security despite a more intricate deployment and higher investment.
Download KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
KerioConnect offers competitive setup costs, focusing on affordability, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security represents a higher initial investment for more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
KerioConnect offers competitive setup costs, focusing on affordability, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security represents a higher initial investment for more comprehensive features.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
TitanHQ WebTitan
4.6 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
TitanHQ WebTitan
4.6 out of 5
TitanHQ's WebTitan offers adaptability through customizable web filtering and diverse deployment options, benefiting organizations needing comprehensive web protection without individual agents. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides extensive threat protection with a focus on effective email security, appealing to users prioritizing email threat detection.
Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. TitanHQ WebTitan Report
TitanHQ WebTitan requires lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly initially, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security has higher setup fees, potentially justified by its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
TitanHQ WebTitan requires lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly initially, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security has higher setup fees, potentially justified by its comprehensive features.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Messaging Gateway
4.1 out of 5
Mimecast excels in advanced threat protection and cloud integration, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security features. In comparison, Symantec is valued for on-premises scalability and management, making it suitable for environments emphasizing in-depth spam and malware protection.
Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report
Symantec Messaging Gateway has an initial setup cost that can be high, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security is known for a simplified and potentially more cost-effective setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Messaging Gateway has an initial setup cost that can be high, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security is known for a simplified and potentially more cost-effective setup process.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Kaspersky Security for Mail Server
3.8 out of 5
Mimecast offers robust features like sandboxing and email archiving integrated with Microsoft 365. In comparison, Kaspersky excels in reliable spam and phishing protection with seamless integration. Mimecast's custom configurations enhance adaptability, while Kaspersky provides cost-effective security and ease of deployment.
Download Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Mimecast Advanced Email Security incurs a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Security for Mail Server requires a higher initial investment. Kaspersky offers comprehensive features which contribute to its premium setup pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security incurs a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Security for Mail Server requires a higher initial investment. Kaspersky offers comprehensive features which contribute to its premium setup pricing.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Vade for M365
1 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Vade for M365
1 out of 5
Mimecast Advanced Email Security attracts tech buyers with robust spam filtering and flexible deployment. In comparison, Vade for M365 appeals with AI-powered phishing detection and seamless Microsoft 365 integration. Mimecast's pricing is competitive, while Vade offers an affordable entry point with advanced features.
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a moderate setup cost, while Vade for M365 boasts a lower setup expense, highlighting cost-efficiency differences.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a moderate setup cost, while Vade for M365 boasts a lower setup expense, highlighting cost-efficiency differences.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Proofpoint Intelligent Compliance Platform
4.0 out of 5
Proofpoint Intelligent Compliance Platform attracts budget-conscious buyers with customizable retention policies and advanced e-discovery. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers robust anti-malware detection and streamlined deployment, appealing to those prioritizing immediate, comprehensive security solutions despite potentially higher initial costs.
Proofpoint's Intelligent Compliance Platform setup cost is higher compared to Mimecast's Advanced Email Security, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Proofpoint's Intelligent Compliance Platform setup cost is higher compared to Mimecast's Advanced Email Security, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud
4.0 out of 5
Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud provides strong archiving capabilities, making it ideal for efficient compliance and data management. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security focuses on advanced threat protection features, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive email security over storage management.
Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud Report
Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud has a higher setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers more affordable initial pricing, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud has a higher setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers more affordable initial pricing, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious organizations.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Material Security
1 out of 5
Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers comprehensive threat protection with seamless integration. In comparison, Material Security provides advanced data integrity features and precise access control. Mimecast suits those seeking robust, broad coverage; while Material Security appeals to buyers needing specialized, data-centric security.
Mimecast Advanced Email Security setup costs are typically higher than those of Material Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security setup costs are typically higher than those of Material Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
N-able Mail Assure
1 out of 5
N-able Mail Assure excels in integration and customized spam filtering, attracting those valuing seamless connections. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers expansive threat protection and encryption, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive security despite higher costs.
N-able Mail Assure offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Mimecast Advanced Email Security incurs higher initial expenses. This pricing difference highlights N-able's cost-effectiveness compared to Mimecast's more robust yet costly features.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able Mail Assure offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Mimecast Advanced Email Security incurs higher initial expenses. This pricing difference highlights N-able's cost-effectiveness compared to Mimecast's more robust yet costly features.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Barracuda Message Archiver
3.8 out of 5
Barracuda Message Archiver offers cost-effective archiving and easy deployment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides extensive threat protection and secure gateways, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive security despite higher initial costs.
Download Barracuda Message Archiver vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report
Barracuda Message Archiver offers a straightforward setup cost option, whereas Mimecast Advanced Email Security presents a more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Message Archiver offers a straightforward setup cost option, whereas Mimecast Advanced Email Security presents a more complex pricing structure.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
Microsoft Purview Customer Lockbox
4.5 out of 5
Mimecast excels in threat intelligence and spam filtering, providing affordable protection. In comparison, Microsoft Purview offers enhanced data control crucial for compliance. Mimecast's ease of deployment suits independent setups, while Purview's seamless Microsoft integration benefits existing users needing comprehensive data governance and privacy.
Mimecast Advanced Email Security typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Purview Customer Lockbox, offering a budget-friendly choice for initial implementation, while Microsoft Purview emphasizes robust security measures at a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Mimecast Advanced Email Security typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Purview Customer Lockbox, offering a budget-friendly choice for initial implementation, while Microsoft Purview emphasizes robust security measures at a higher initial investment.
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
ZixArchive
1 out of 5
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Logo
ZixArchive
1 out of 5
ZixArchive excels in customer support and pricing satisfaction, appealing to those prioritizing data compliance. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security attracts decision-makers with its robust threat protection and security suite, despite higher costs, offering significant long-term investment value.
ZixArchive offers a lower setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ZixArchive offers a lower setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security requires a higher initial investment.

Related categories

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)
Email Archiving
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)