No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
3.7 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers advanced traffic management and security features for web applications. It includes built-in rules, Layer 7 control, autoscaling, and integration options, providing flexibility and security for managing application traffic efficiently.

Get the Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Imperva Application Security Platform and more!
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is the #7 ranked solution in top Application Delivery Controllers and top Web Application Firewalls. PeerSpot users give Microsoft Azure Application Gateway an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most commonly compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 11% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
April 2026
Get the report
Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Featured Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

Read more reviews

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway mindshare

Product category:
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
As of April 2026, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 5.6%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway5.6%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)13.6%
NetScaler12.2%
Other68.6%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Apr 30, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 30, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Apr 30, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Azure Application Gateway vs HAProxyApr 30, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Azure Application Gateway vs NetScalerApr 30, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.2N/A98%114 interviewsAdd to research
Imperva Application Security Platform4.3N/A95%143 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's most valued aspects include Layer 7 control, customization, ease of integration, and configuration. Features like Web Application Firewall, load balancing, autoscaling, and traffic management stand out. Users appreciate the compatibility with Azure, simplification of application deployments, effective security measures, URL-based routing, SSL support, and seamless integration with other services. The service provides robust monitoring, automation, and support, enhancing protection, efficiency, and performance for users' applications.
  • "It does an excellent job of load balancing."
  • "This product works well to secure my public facing websites from things like sql injections"
  • "The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are the policies, the data store they are using, and the cloud platform it operates on."

Room for Improvement

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway requires improvements in pricing and integration, and its documentation needs enhancement. Users report challenges with user-friendliness, a complex setup process, and scalability issues. There is a need for improved security features, customizable configurations, and better support for different protocols. Concerns also arise around monitoring, real-time diagnostics, and better management of application balance. Users suggest a more intuitive interface and enhanced support services. Performance improvements and automation in processes are also necessary.
  • "The increased security that we are considering is because of some of the things that the security team has brought to our attention. They have pointed out that we would most likely require a better web application firewall than Azure Application Gateway."
  • "It is a bit tricky to configure in the UI. You've got to configure front end back end ports ips and map the listeners and rules for single or multi sites to configure it."
  • "The support that they provide could be faster."

ROI

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway shows a reasonable ROI, primarily through cost and time savings, as fewer personnel are required due to vendor management. The ease of infrastructure setup aids cost control, though unapproved setups can lead to expenses. Cost management specialists use the Azure calculator for detailed assessments. Returns are higher with increased capacity and shared resources but can escalate with too many gateways. Overall savings range from 30% to 40%.

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's pricing is generally perceived as expensive compared to alternatives like AWS and Barracuda, though some consider it competitive without annual licensing fees. It follows a pay-as-you-go model based on usage, data transfer, and scalability. Enterprise users appreciate its cost-effectiveness within their Azure ecosystem, although some express concerns over additional costs and pricing structure changes between v1 and v2. Overall, it's seen as suitable for larger scale deployments despite varying cost perceptions.
  • "The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."
  • "The solution is fairly priced."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."

Popular Use Cases

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is used for enhancing security and load balancing by filtering and protecting web and application traffic. Organizations utilize it for Layer 7 firewall and SSL termination, routing through private and public IPs, and integrating with Azure services. Its primary use includes exposing web services securely, enabling reverse proxy, and applying security measures against vulnerabilities such as OWASP Top 10, while efficiently managing internal and external requests.

Service and Support

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway receives varied feedback regarding customer service and support. Some users find the technical assistance helpful and responsive, rating it highly, while others experience delays, insufficient expertise, and impersonal interactions due to outsourced support. Communication can be inconsistent, with some praising the expertise yet encountering difficulties with response times and ticket resolutions. Service satisfaction varies widely among users, with ratings from four to ten, highlighting the need for faster, more consistent support.

Deployment

Many found Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's initial setup straightforward and quick, though some experienced challenges with configuration and network knowledge requirements. Deployment could take from minutes to hours depending on specific needs. Companies utilized automation tools like Terraform, and familiarity with routing and load balancers proved beneficial. The setup was generally manageable without additional resources, supported by Microsoft's documentation and guidance, though aspects such as rule configurations and certificate mapping were occasionally tricky.

Scalability

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway allows easy scalability and is equipped with autoscaling features. Its performance varies with resource management, yet most users find it adaptable. While some challenges exist with resource consumption, especially when integrating added functionalities, many users operate smoothly with varied user bases. Typically supporting small to medium-sized needs, versions may limit upgrades. Many rate it highly for scalability, with a few noting potential future improvements.

Stability

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is generally stable and reliable. Users report minimal issues with crashes, bugs, or glitches. Most rate its stability between seven and ten. A few encounter minor challenges, issues with configuration, and some rate it below seven. Despite differing experiences, many find it dependable when configured correctly, providing satisfactory performance in various applications. Stability is consistently positive for those with thorough resource planning and correct setup.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business238
Midsize Enterprise181
Large Enterprise550
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Retailer
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
University
3%
Construction Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Religious Institution
1%

Compare Microsoft Azure Application Gateway with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Azure Application Gateway is utilized by organizations for securing and managing web traffic with its comprehensive web application firewall, load balancing capabilities, and Layer 7 firewall rules. Known for its ease of setup and integration, the platform facilitates external application access and deploys secure services. While it enhances security with customized configurations, users note areas for improvement such as configuration complexity, pricing, third-party tool integration, and automation. Addressing these aspects can improve user experience and performance.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
  • Built-in Rules: Pre-configured rules help streamline traffic management and enhance security.
  • Layer 7 Control: Offers detailed traffic routing and policies based on application-level information.
  • Real-Time Autoscaling: Automatically adjusts resources to meet demand and optimize performance.
  • Comprehensive WAF Protection: Guards against web vulnerabilities and potential threats.
  • Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Azure services for enhanced workflow efficiency.
What benefits do users look for in reviews?
  • Traffic Routing: Efficiently directs application traffic based on defined rules for improved performance.
  • Security: Provides robust protection for internet-facing applications.
  • Ease of Setup: Simplifies deployment and management of applications.
  • Flexibility: Supports different application scenarios with customizable configurations.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Application Gateway to protect sensitive data and manage significant web traffic. Its application deployment support and security capabilities make it suitable for businesses needing to ensure secure data exchange and reliable access to online services.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway was previously known as Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway customers

Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell

Related questions

  • 50
What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?
  • 39
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
  • 34
What are the pros and cons of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for a large construction company?
  • 95
When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 374
Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org
  • 94
Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
  • 81
What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
  • 102
Why do I need an ADC solution?
  • 103
What is the best ADC solution?
  • 90
Why is Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
NGINX Plus vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
NGINX Plus vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Akamai App and API Protector vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Akamai App and API Protector vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Fortinet FortiADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Azure Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
See all alternatives
 
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Cloud Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I've found Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reliable and secure for web traffic management, with useful features like mutual TLS and WAF. Although it's costly and could improve protocol support, its scalability and support make it valuable.
Cloud Head at White-Spunner & Associates4.5I’ve used Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for over 10 years and find it secure, scalable, and feature-rich, though configuration can be complex; it’s reliable, integrates well with Azure services, and I recommend it for traffic management and security.
IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital4.5I primarily use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for web applications, appreciating its autoscaling, cost savings, and security features. However, I desire more AI functions and a better dashboard. It helped reduce expenses by about 30-40%.
Information Security and Compliance Officer at Carnation3.5We use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for internal application development, appreciating its integration with other solutions and security features like SSL. While the user interface needs improvement, it saves us time and costs, yielding around 40% ROI.
IT Architect at Western Cape Government3.5I use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway to publish web applications. It's user-friendly, flexible, and effective in threat detection, though not scalable. It offers great value by reducing management needs, yet controlling infrastructure costs is crucial to avoid unexpected expenses.
Senior Network Engineer at Eyegear3.0Microsoft Azure Application Gateway effectively manages microservices and allows developers to test and assess web applications. The custom domain feature enhances user experience by offering memorable links, but the pricing could be improved. It integrates easily with other platforms.
Advisor Cloud Master Architecture Azure AWS (USA, UK, Argentina) at Jorge Palaia4.0I rely on Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for integrating multiple applications with security and networking solutions. Its flexibility, scalability, and robust documentation enhance business outcomes, though it could improve service integration and application balancing. Azure outperforms competitors in Microsoft applications integration.
Trader at a consultancy with 1-10 employees4.0I've used Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for hosting a simple at-home application with built-in load balancing. It's easy to use but can feel cumbersome without professional infrastructure skills. The solution is inherently complex, requiring manual decisions for optimal setup.