AWS WAF and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are leading contenders in web application protection. AWS WAF holds an advantage due to its flexibility and cost-effective pricing model, while Azure Application Gateway is known for its seamless integration with Azure services.
Features: AWS WAF offers flexibility with WAF rules, integration within AWS environments, scalability, and threat blocking. Its customizable billing options enhance its cost-effectiveness. Azure Application Gateway provides ease of use, scalability, and API Gateway capabilities, along with security management against top OWASP threats.
Room for Improvement: AWS WAF could improve automation, expand security features, and make rule management simpler. There is a need for enhanced integration with third-party solutions and better documentation. Azure Application Gateway needs to address performance and scalability issues, increase configuration flexibility, and offer better threat detection with protocol support enhancements. Its pricing model could be more transparent.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS WAF stands out for its ease of integration with AWS services, although it has varied customer service reviews, noting both responsiveness and support package issues. Azure Application Gateway provides versatile deployment but involves complex configurations. Customer service feedback suggests the need for better handling of queries.
Pricing and ROI: AWS WAF uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model that aligns with scaling needs, though costs can be unpredictable. It is generally seen as affordable. Azure Application Gateway, though more costly, is competitive due to deep Azure integration. It can strain smaller budgets but offers significant security features that contribute to ROI by preventing breaches.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
Resolving issues can take time because the support personnel may lack product expertise, leading to delays.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
In terms of reliability, I would rate AWS WAF about six out of ten due to the need for improved signature sets.
Compared to firewalls, WAFs generally provide limited stateful analysis capabilities.
Features like bot protection or DDoS mitigation, available with other WAF vendors, do not come natively with AWS WAF.
In future releases of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would like to see more AI functionalities and a better dashboard as well as some customizations.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
Due to our status as an AWS shop, AWS WAF is cost-effective for us, and we benefit from discounts due to our extensive use of AWS services.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The cloud-native nature of AWS is crucial since most of our workload is in AWS, making AWS WAF native to Amazon Web Services.
AWS WAF is not stateful, it offers a time-saving solution with its custom rulesets that enhance security and simplify management.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a firewall security system that monitors incoming and outgoing traffic for applications and websites based on your pre-defined web security rules. AWS WAF defends applications and websites from common Web attacks that could otherwise damage application performance and availability and compromise security.
You can create rules in AWS WAF that can include blocking specific HTTP headers, IP addresses, and URI strings. These rules prevent common web exploits, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting. Once defined, new rules are deployed within seconds, and can easily be tracked so you can monitor their effectiveness via real-time insights. These saved metrics include URIs, IP addresses, and geo locations for each request.
AWS WAF Features
Some of the solution's top features include:
Reviews from Real Users
AWS WAF stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its user-friendly interface and its integration capabilities.
Kavin K., a security analyst at M2P Fintech, writes, “I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through.”
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.