AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 3, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Application...
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
3rd
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of AWS WAF is 16.2%, down from 17.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is 8.7%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
5.2%
 

Featured Reviews

CK
Jul 11, 2023
Useful for protecting against unauthorized access and data breaches but very expensive
We use the AWS platform to implement custom security rules based on our company's SOP. We apply custom rules to protect specific APIs and specific endpoint URLs. This allows us to tailor our security measures to our specific needs and requirements AWS WAF has improved our organization by allowing…
Sami - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 29, 2022
High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure
Our company uses the solution to publish services that are on Azure. There is more than one way to publish services.  You can use the Microsoft infrastructure for app services including small programming, configurations related to obligations, and publishing. Or you can publish manually by using…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
"We do not have to maintain the solution."
"AWS WAF is very easy to use and configure on AWS."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"Some of the key features of this solution are the low-level maintenance required, floating proxy service, and load balancing."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are the policies, the data store they are using, and the cloud platform it operates on."
"Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts."
"It is a scalable solution...The installation phase of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is very easy."
"This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date."
"We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled."
"The health probe is pretty good for your backend health. It tells you whether it's communicating and talking to the endpoint correctly. It is quite useful."
 

Cons

"They should make the implementation process faster."
"It would be good if the solution provided managed WAF services."
"When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them."
"We need more support as we go global."
"We should be able to do proper whitelisting."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"On the UI side, I would like it if they could bring back the geolocation view on the corner."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"We have encountered some issues with automatic redirection and cancellation, leading to 502 and 504 gateway errors. So, I experienced some trouble with containers."
"The configuration is very specific right now and needs to be much more flexible."
"Scalability can be an issue."
"I believe that there is room for improvement in terms of additional functionality. It is an advantage to have features readily available for configuration without needing customer-defined rules."
"The solution has many limitations. You cannot upgrade the VPN to the application gateway. So I started with version one, which has limited capabilities, and they provided version two. And unfortunately, I cannot upgrade from v one to v two like other services. So I have to decommission the version one and create a new one with version two. Also the version one was complex with the certificates uploading the SQL certificates."
"One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS."
"The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"There are no separate licensing costs we pay for since it is included in the plan we purchase."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven or eight out of ten."
"Its price is fair. There is a very fair amount that they charge. It has a pay-as-you-go model, so it pretty much depends on how much a user uses it. As per the cloud norms, the more you use, the more you pay. I would rate it a five out of ten in terms of pricing."
"We are kind of doing a POC comparison to see what works best. Pricing-wise, AWS is one of the most attractive ones. It is fairly cheap, and we like the pricing part. We're trying to see what makes more sense operation-wise, license-wise, and pricing-wise."
"AWS WAF costs $5 monthly plus $1 for the rule. It's cheap, cost-wise. It's worth the money."
"It's an annual subscription."
"The solution's cost depends on the use cases."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is expensive."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has less price than other application gateway solutions."
"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being cheap and one being expensive."
"We use the tool's basic subscription. Its licensing costs are monthly."
"The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."
"The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."
"I rate the pricing seven out of ten because some third-party solutions are even costlier than this."
"The solution is fairly priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are the limitations of AWS WAF vs alternative WAFs?
Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud WAF is t...
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...
What do you like most about AWS WAF?
The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system.
What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?
We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
The solution is fairly priced. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.
 

Also Known As

AWS Web Application Firewall
Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.