HAProxy and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway compete in the load balancing category. HAProxy appears to have the upper hand in affordability and customization due to its open-source model, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides strong cloud integration and managed solutions, though at a higher cost.
Features: HAProxy offers load balancing with various algorithms, high performance, and flexibility in TCP and HTTP handling. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides ease of use, comprehensive security through its web application firewall, and seamless cloud integration.
Room for Improvement: HAProxy users suggest improvements in monitoring, dynamic configuration, and documentation for dynamic ACLs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway needs better scalability, improved integration capabilities, and enhancements in performance and certificate handling.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HAProxy is praised for detailed documentation but needs better support availability. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers robust integration and professional support but can be complex to set up initially.
Pricing and ROI: HAProxy is cost-effective with its open-source entry providing significant ROI and minimal investment. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's pricing is competitive in a cloud context but can be expensive when scaling compared to on-premises solutions.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
In future releases of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would like to see more AI functionalities and a better dashboard as well as some customizations.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
HAProxy is considered by many in the industry to be one of the fastest and most popular and trusted software load balancer products in the marketplace today. Organizations are able to immediately deploy HAProxy solutions to enable websites and applications to optimize performance, security, and observability. HAProxy solutions are available to scale to any environment.
HAProxy is an open-source product and has a robust, active, reliable community. The solutions are continually tested and improved on by the community. HAProxy offers a dynamic design to support the most modern architectures, microservices, and deployment environments (appliances, containers, virtual, and cloud).
HAProxy utilizes a cloud-native protocol, which makes it a complete solution for cloud services such as Red Hat OpenShift, OVH, Rackspace, Digital Ocean, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and more. It also can be used as the reference load balancer in OpenStack.
HAProxy Products
Reviews from Real Users
“Having the right load balancing solution – which is what HAProxy is – and protection in place gives organizations peace of mind.” - Nathanel S., Platform Architect at SES
“I use HAProxy for individuals who can not buy low balancers. I built NFV in a box and send individuals a pathway into an HAProxy VM. The setup was not difficult; it usually takes a day to complete for a VPC. When it comes to pricing, HAProxy is free.” - Nasir O., Network & Cloud Architect at Koala Compute Inc.
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
