Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway comparison

Cloudflare Web Application ...
Read 20 Cloudflare Web Application Firewall reviews
  • 8,036 Views
  • 5,841 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure Application...
Read 45 Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews
  • 13,064 Views
  • 11,116 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is praised for its load balancing capabilities, SSL termination, and integration with Azure services. Users are satisfied with customer support, reasonable pricing, and positive ROI. Improvement areas include scalability and user interface. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall excels in website security, customer service, integration with Cloudflare services, and competitive pricing. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and detailed reporting capabilities. Areas for enhancement include customization options, response times, and ease of use.

Features: The valuable features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway include excellent load balancing capabilities and seamless integration with other Azure services. On the other hand, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is highly praised for its ability to enhance website security and effectively block malicious traffic. Additionally, it offers comprehensive reporting capabilities and seamless integration with other Cloudflare services.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is minimal and the pricing is considered fair by customers. On the other hand, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers competitive pricing with straightforward setup costs and users appreciate the flexibility of licensing options available., Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has positive ROI with efficient and reliable performance, cost-effectiveness, scalability, flexibility, and ease of use. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall also results in significant financial gains.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has room for improvement in terms of scalability, performance, user interface, documentation, and support resources. On the other hand, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could benefit from enhancements in customization options, response times, ease of use, and interface simplification.

Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway revealed varying durations for deployment and setup, ranging from three months and an additional week to just one week for both phases. On the other hand, reviews for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall also showed variations in the time required, with some users mentioning three months for deployment and a week for setup, while others reported one week for both phases. Context is crucial for accurate evaluation., Regarding customer service and support, both Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall receive positive remarks from users. Azure's support is praised for its responsiveness, expertise, and helpfulness in resolving issues. On the other hand, Cloudflare's support is commended for its prompt addressing of issues and clear instructions, making users feel supported and confident in using the product.

The summary above is based on 32 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report (Updated: July 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
July 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 793,295 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Application...
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
3rd
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is 7.4%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is 8.7%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
5.2%
 

Featured Reviews

JA
Aug 16, 2023
A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules
The firewall has rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules. Some of the features we’re using to a limited extent because they require an extra subscription. We have just the basic one. For example, advanced rate-limiting features are available, but we only use basic rate-limiting. We mainly use custom and managed firewall rules, which work well for us. We also use DDoS protection, which is probably one of the main features of the Cloudflare solution. DDoS protection was the initial thing we signed up for Cloudflare to protect our exposed web services and sites. We also use Cloudflare DNS, logs, and analytics.
Read full review
Abdelrahman Anwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 30, 2022
The self-maintaining platform is very stable and easy to use
Our company uses the solution as a gateway for our customers' application services. We currently have seven users and six customers.  The solution has been very helpful.  The cloud platform is really easy to use and doesn't require any maintenance.  The solution provides great automation and it…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product has improved our security posture by blocking bad actors."
"There is a huge signature repository"
"It protects web applications efficiently."
"It's pretty convenient and pretty easy to set up and run. And then kind of for static content, it also offers caching."
"It is configurable via API."
"The product has a valuable security control functionality."
"The integration of Cloudflare with Cloud Suite is its most valuable feature."
"I'm highly satisfied. It's remarkably user-friendly, enabling me to quickly identify issues, and deploy solutions, and it offers the necessary features."
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pros
"Load balancing and web application firewall features are the most valuable."
"We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is an easy-to-use solution."
"The solution's integration is very good."
"The solution provides great automation and it is easy to upgrade service."
"The solution's most valuable feature is an HTTP solution and SSL certificate. It is also easy to use."
"We use the product in front-end and back-end applications to do the load balancing smartly."
"The pricing is quite good."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pros
 

Cons

"The notification part could be improved. It's very much connected to Web Application Firewall, rate-limiting, and DDoS protection."
"The accuracy of the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could be improved by reducing the number of false-negative alerts."
"There could be an option to duplicate the cluster to maintain the consistency of rules."
"They have some limitations with third-party integrations."
"The ModSecurity core rules need to be updated."
"If they add logs history within the Cloudflare offering, that would be a great benefit."
"The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement."
"Support can be challenging at times."
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall cons
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"It could be easier to change servicing."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is not scalable."
"The monitoring on the solution could be better."
"The increased security that we are considering is because of some of the things that the security team has brought to our attention. They have pointed out that we would most likely require a better web application firewall than Azure Application Gateway."
"The solution can sometimes feel a little cumbersome unless you're a professional infrastructure person."
"It is a bit tricky to configure. You've got to have a very specific format to configure it. They should make it a little bit easier to configure. Mapping the certificates into it isn't easy, and it could be better. Currently, you've to write a bit of automation to pull certificates directly to HTTPS."
"The configuration is very specific right now and needs to be much more flexible."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
"The solution is expensive."
"What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
"The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
"It is not too pricey."
"The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
"It starts at $20 and can easily go up to $200 monthly"
"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice
"The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."
"I rate the price of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway an eight out of ten."
"The product is not expensive."
"Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."
"We use the tool's basic subscription. Its licensing costs are monthly."
"The solution is paid monthly. The solution is highly expensive."
"The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."
"Regarding pricing for Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it at seven."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
The product has a valuable security control functionality.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
The cost of the solution depends upon the type of web application use cases. It starts at $20 and can easily go up to $200 monthly. The SASE product from the same vendor starts at around $8 per mon...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
Account-level features would be a very good option. Some clients want to implement the same checks on multiple zones (URLs or websites). Cloudflare recently introduced account-level features, but i...
See all answers
What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?
We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...
See all answers
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Akamai App and API Protector vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Akamai App and API Protector vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 17% of the time
AWS WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
AWS WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 14% of the time
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 10% of the time
Azure Front Door vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Front Door vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 6% of the time
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 5% of the time
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors
F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Compared 11% of the time
NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Compared 11% of the time
AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Compared 10% of the time
HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Compared 9% of the time
Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Logo
Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Compared 8% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
July 2024
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall reportDownload Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
July 2024
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reportDownload Microsoft Azure Application Gateway product report
 

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF
Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway
 

Learn More

Cloudflare
Microsoft
 

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

 

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell
Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
July 2024
Free Report: Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.