F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on May 29, 2022

We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: While some F5 BIG-IP users say the initial setup is straightforward, other users disagree and say it is complex. Most Azure Application Gateway users agree that its setup is straightforward.
  • Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability and scalability. F5 BIG-IP users like its load balancing functionality and its monitoring tools and say it is flexible and high performing. Several users mention that its UI should be more intuitive. Azure Application Gateway users praise its WAF feature for replicating firewalls and say it is a flexible solution. Several users note that Azure Application Gateway needs better integration options.
  • Pricing: Most F5 BIG-IP users feel it is an expensive product, whereas Azure Application Gateway users say it is reasonably priced.

  • ROI: F5 BIG-IP reviewers report seeing an ROI. Azure Application Gateway reviewers do not mention ROI.
  • Service and Support: Most users of both solutions report being satisfied with the level of support they receive.

Comparison Results: F5 BIG-IP comes out on top in this comparison. It is powerful and flexible with a proven ROI. Azure Application Gateway does come out on top in the pricing and ease of deployment categories, however.

771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We enjoy its overall ease of use.""We are fond of the load balancing feature for DNS and servers.""Initial setup was straightforward. We were up and running in three hours.""Currently, it's distributing the load perfectly, as per my understanding of our requirements.""F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) improves the resilience and quality of the application itself, the speed and the user experience for the application. The data that the users need from the application is actually acquired faster. So, it provides faster data acquisition.""The most valuable feature is customization.""It offers features Kemp doesn't provide. For example, there are predefined templates for handling Office 365. You can download them for automatic configuration.""It is a stable product from a stable company. Recently, they have been more focused on security as well."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is its ease of use.""The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs.""The pricing is quite good.""In my experience, Microsoft products have a smooth integration and facilitate easy management and monitoring. Using Azure Application Gateway allows us to efficiently handle the system loads.""Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.""We find it valuable because it is compatible with our existing Azure solution.""We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities.""The product's initial setup phase was easy."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pros →

"An expensive solution for the minimal features we use.""Native support for containers should be added to future releases, as this is the future of load balancing.""They could improve the product's ease of use. There is some confusion how to operate it.""The deployment could be simplified.""In terms of pricing, it could be more competitive.""The synchronization does works fairly well. However, if I were to make changes, I would make it easier to start the sync process.""I would like to see better integration.""Right now, there are a lot of products within F5's portfolio. They acquired a couple of companies like NGINX and Volterra. Some features and technologies overlapped when this acquisition occurred. They need to refine it and come up with a single, proper solution. F5 should focus more on zero trust network access (ZTNA).They should be more focused on that framework because the industry is moving towards that. Everyone is talking about SASE and zero trust."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Cons →

"The product could be easier to use and implement.""The support can be improved when you are configuring the system rules. The Disaster Recovery feature can be added in the next release. The price of the solution can be reduced a bit.""The security of the product could be adjusted.""Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port.""The configuration is very specific right now and needs to be much more flexible.""I want the solution's support to improve. The tool is also expensive.""The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules.""In the next release, the solution could improve the integration with Service Mesh and other Azure Security Services."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Though functionality is high, its cost can be considered slightly higher than its competitors​."
  • "The licensing pricing seems relatively easy enough to get your head around. I would advise anyone to ensure that you have a conversation with an F5 consultant before purchasing, as you would with most products."
  • "Take a look at the modules that you are going to use. Look into the best bundles for them."
  • "The only area that has room for improvement would be pricing, so its competitors do not have a say."
  • "If your IT budget is good, go for it."
  • "This product is costly from a licensing perspective considering its competitors."
  • "Check other vendors like Cisco, Citrix or A10 Networks. There are plenty in the market with which you can achieve same thing."
  • "Great product for the money. But they can get really expensive, so get what meets your needs."
  • More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is not expensive."
  • "Every solution comes with a license and cost. Microsoft provides the license and the total cost is for the maintenance every year."
  • "Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."
  • "There is some additional cost, such as extended support."
  • "The cost is not an issue."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced compared to other solutions."
  • "The pricing is based on how much you use the solution."
  • "The solution is paid monthly. The solution is highly expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The support from F5 BIG-IP LTM is good.
    Top Answer:There are a few licensing options available for F5 BIG-IP LTM. You can have a perpetual license which is a lifetime license. You then only need to renew the support, if you choose to open a ticket… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing must be more flexible. We get billed for firewalls based on the usage. It will be helpful if the solution provides such flexibility.
    Top Answer:We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit for… more »
    Top Answer:I rate Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 1000 users who use it daily.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
    Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway
    Learn More

    F5 BIG-IP LTM optimizes the speed and reliability of your apps via both network and application layers. Using real-time protocol and traffic management decisions based on app and server and connection management conditions, and TCP and content offloading, BIG-IP LTM dramatically improves application and infrastructure responsiveness. BIG-IP LTM's architecture includes protocol awareness to control traffic for the most important applications. BIG-IP LTM tracks the dynamic performance levels of servers and delivers SSL performance and visibility for inbound and outbound traffic, to protect the user experience by encrypting everything from the client to the server.

    BIG-IP LTM provides enterprise-class Application Delivery Controller (ADC). You get granular layer 7 control, SSL offloading and acceleration capabilities, and advanced scaling technologies that deliver performance and reliability on-demand. The highly optimized TCP/IP stack combines TCP/IP techniques and improvements in the latest RFCs with extensions to minimize the effect of congestion and packet loss and recovery. Independent testing tools and customer experiences show LTM's TCP stack delivers up to a 2x performance gain for users and a 4x increase in bandwidth efficiency.

    Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Sample Customers
    Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
    Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell
    Top Industries
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 116 reviews while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 40 reviews. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Helps deliver applications to users in a reliable, secure, and optimized way". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC, NGINX Plus, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with AWS WAF, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Front Door and Imperva Web Application Firewall. See our F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report.

    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.