IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
Competitor
# Comparisons
Rating
Buyer's Guide
Remote Access
April 2022
Get our free report covering TeamViewer, and other competitors of ISL Online. Updated: April 2022.
596,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of ISL Online alternatives and competitors

CEO at Parcom d.o.o. Nova Gorica
User
Top 20
Intuitive and reliable with a useful “always-on” connection
Pros and Cons
  • "We can also monitor our systems at any time from practically anywhere."
  • "There could be a section in the menu describing the new features and changes."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the product for offering remote technical support to our clients and customers. We are an outsourcing IT company, and we provide services and support to various businesses in our region.

We use ISL whenever we have the possibility of connecting to clients remotely. This allows us to be much faster and more flexible in regards to solving any technical issues our clients may have. As ISL works across most operating systems, it allows us to have a single product that covers all areas of our operation.

How has it helped my organization?

We are more responsive and efficient now. We can monitor and connect with our clients within minutes of opening the ticket. It helps us to save on cost and time in travel to client's premises.

We can also monitor our systems at any time from practically anywhere. The software is very intuitive to our customers, therefore, we don’t have to spend a lot of time explaining to them how to use it and how to establish the connection.

The solution is also very easy to operate. It only takes a few minutes to train new employees.

ISL allows us to be quick to react and it's also friendly to people who are not most proficient with computers.

What is most valuable?

Since we only have to provide an eight-digit number to our customers, it makes the whole process much easier and faster. Some clients have become so familiar with the product, that they have it already ready when we call them and they only ask, “what is the number”. The icon is also very distinguishable, so it’s easy to explain to the customers what to look for on the website or the desktop.

The ability to set an “always-on” connection is very valuable, as we don’t have to interact directly with the clients to establish the connection. It also allows for a fast glance at the operation of the systems, to see if they are online or not. The ability to save the computers and categorize them in groups also saves us time.

The stability and reliability of the whole system are very valuable and In our many years of use, we haven’t had one incident, where we weren’t able to provide remote assistance because of ISL issues.

The sessions can also be paused and transferred to another operator. That way, if one operator has issues, they can be transferred to another technician, without interruption from the client-side. Since everyone can see the active sessions, we can also collaborate much easier.

What needs improvement?

I would like to have the feature of seeing the details of the past sessions and for them to be segmented based on the PC name of the technician or some other metric and the name of the remote PC. That would make for an easier overview of the product use per technician and make for easier documentation.

It would also be nice to have more information about the new features as they are being rolled out. There could be a section in the menu describing the new features and changes.

Overall the solution is stable and mature.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for more than ten years - since 2010.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is really stable; we didn’t encounter any downtime or any significant issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I don’t see any issues regarding the scalability of the solution. If we need more licenses, it’s easy to contact the support and resolve the issue.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support is very good. They respond quickly and provide quality support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before ISL we were using TeamViewer. However, due to various issues, we were looking for a replacement and ISL offered everything we needed at a good price.

With TeamViewer the clients had to install the software, there were always version discrepancies and the general confusion with the ID and password.

ISL offers a quick solution that doesn’t need any installation on the client-side.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very straightforward. We just installed it and integrated it into the website. It didn’t take long before our customers became used to it and started to prefer it over the previous TeamViewer.

What was our ROI?

The ROI is very good, it pays off within weeks of regular use.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would advise the new users to simply try using it with the evaluation license and see if it fits your business needs. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We transitioned directly from Teamviewer to ISL. We first used the evaluation version of ISL and since we were pleased with the solution, we decided to purchase the license.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, we are very pleased with this solution, for us, it simply works 99.9% of the time.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Buyer's Guide
Remote Access
April 2022
Get our free report covering TeamViewer, and other competitors of ISL Online. Updated: April 2022.
596,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.