Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
FortiCNAPP Logo

Top 10 FortiCNAPP Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top FortiCNAPP Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to FortiCNAPP based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Wiz, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. FortiCNAPP surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with Fortinet's Security Fabric, providing advanced threat detection, real-time analytics, and AI-driven security automation, ensuring comprehensive protection for cloud-native applications and enhancing overall cloud security posture.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
FortiCNAPP Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Cloudflare offers an extensive CDN and ease of use, making it suitable for enhancing security across diverse infrastructures. In comparison, FortiCNAPP focuses on compliance and cloud security management, appealing to those prioritizing regulatory standards like PCI and SOC 2.
Download Cloudflare vs. FortiCNAPP Report
Cloudflare setup costs are typically lower compared to FortiCNAPP, which requires a more significant initial investment. However, FortiCNAPP offers extensive features that might justify the higher setup costs for businesses seeking robust cloud application security.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare setup costs are typically lower compared to FortiCNAPP, which requires a more significant initial investment. However, FortiCNAPP offers extensive features that might justify the higher setup costs for businesses seeking robust cloud application security.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers ease of use and detailed compliance reporting, suitable for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Wiz provides a thorough risk visualization and advanced threat analysis, appealing to organizations requiring comprehensive cloud visibility despite its higher cost.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Wiz Report
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost than Wiz, providing a budget-friendly option, while Wiz offers more comprehensive initial support through its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost than Wiz, providing a budget-friendly option, while Wiz offers more comprehensive initial support through its higher setup cost.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in compliance and anomaly detection, offering seamless integration and strong reporting capabilities. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security shines in real-time threat detection and AI-driven response, making it ideal for proactive threat management and automated vulnerability handling.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
FortiCNAPP setup costs are higher, delivering comprehensive security features, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security requires lower initial investment with efficient deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP setup costs are higher, delivering comprehensive security features, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security requires lower initial investment with efficient deployment.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in ease of use and advanced threat management through machine learning, making it ideal for swift alert handling. In comparison, Snyk offers a transparent vulnerability database and seamless developer tool integration, appealing to development teams seeking efficient vulnerability management.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Snyk Report
FortiCNAPP features an affordable setup cost, while Snyk presents a higher initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP features an affordable setup cost, while Snyk presents a higher initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in machine learning anomaly detection and seamless data ingestion, fitting those prioritizing streamlined security management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers real-time monitoring and strong integration in Microsoft environments, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive multi-cloud support and robust compliance features.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
FortiCNAPP's initial setup cost is minimal, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more substantial investment. FortiCNAPP offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the higher setup costs associated with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP's initial setup cost is minimal, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more substantial investment. FortiCNAPP offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the higher setup costs associated with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace emphasizes advanced AI for anomaly detection and automated responses. In comparison, FortiCNAPP provides extensive cloud resource management with strong compliance. Tech buyers may choose Darktrace for AI innovation or FortiCNAPP for multi-cloud security control, depending on specific organizational needs.
Download Darktrace vs. FortiCNAPP Report
Darktrace has a higher setup cost, while FortiCNAPP comes with more budget-friendly initial pricing. FortiCNAPP's affordability contrasts with Darktrace's premium start-up expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace has a higher setup cost, while FortiCNAPP comes with more budget-friendly initial pricing. FortiCNAPP's affordability contrasts with Darktrace's premium start-up expenses.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in comprehensive security features, including container scanning and compliance management. In comparison, FortiCNAPP offers clear licensing and is effective for threat detection, though it lacks Prisma Cloud's advanced capabilities like micro-segmentation and broader deployment options.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost than FortiCNAPP, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost than FortiCNAPP, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Checkmarx One enhances developer skills with vulnerability pinpointing and pre-compilation SAST scanning, making it ideal for diverse languages and integrations. In comparison, FortiCNAPP excels in cloud security with strong threat detection using machine learning, focusing on compliance monitoring and anomaly detection.
Download Checkmarx One vs. FortiCNAPP Report
Checkmarx One offers lower setup costs compared to FortiCNAPP, which can result in more immediate savings, while FortiCNAPP demonstrates robust integration capabilities that can justify its higher initial investment for users prioritizing comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One offers lower setup costs compared to FortiCNAPP, which can result in more immediate savings, while FortiCNAPP demonstrates robust integration capabilities that can justify its higher initial investment for users prioritizing comprehensive security features.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
Veracode offers diverse application security solutions with extensive integration options. In comparison, FortiCNAPP focuses on cloud-native compliance monitoring, providing flexible and economical pricing for cloud security. Tech buyers may select Veracode for broader security needs or FortiCNAPP for cloud-focused services and cost-effectiveness.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Veracode Report
Veracode's setup costs are budget-friendly with straightforward implementation, while FortiCNAPP involves a higher initial investment but offers advanced features. Veracode targets cost-conscious users, whereas FortiCNAPP appeals to those seeking comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode's setup costs are budget-friendly with straightforward implementation, while FortiCNAPP involves a higher initial investment but offers advanced features. Veracode targets cost-conscious users, whereas FortiCNAPP appeals to those seeking comprehensive capabilities.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers a comprehensive feature set including continuous monitoring and asset tagging, prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively. In comparison, FortiCNAPP highlights anomaly detection and compliance support, appealing with its straightforward pricing, although it lacks Qualys' integrated vulnerability scanning level.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while FortiCNAPP involves a more complex installation, possibly leading to higher setup expenses. Their setup processes highlight a clear difference in initial cost implications.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while FortiCNAPP involves a more complex installation, possibly leading to higher setup expenses. Their setup processes highlight a clear difference in initial cost implications.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Tenable Nessus offers extensive vulnerability scanning with predictive prioritization, ideal for integration across systems. In comparison, FortiCNAPP excels in anomaly detection and security benchmarking, suited for cloud environments. Both provide distinct advantages—comprehensive features in Nessus and holistic security in FortiCNAPP.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Tenable Nessus offers a cost-effective initial setup with user-friendly features, while FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost but provides extensive cloud security options.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Nessus offers a cost-effective initial setup with user-friendly features, while FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost but provides extensive cloud security options.
FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers detailed compliance reporting and integration capabilities, ideal for environments needing comprehensive security posture insights. In comparison, AWS GuardDuty provides seamless AWS service integration, ensuring efficient threat detection and monitoring. A tech buyer might choose FortiCNAPP for extensive compliance needs, while GuardDuty suits those prioritizing AWS ecosystem alignment.
Download AWS GuardDuty vs. FortiCNAPP Report
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost compared to AWS GuardDuty, highlighting its affordability for budget-conscious users. In contrast, AWS GuardDuty's setup cost reflects its integration features and comprehensive threat detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost compared to AWS GuardDuty, highlighting its affordability for budget-conscious users. In contrast, AWS GuardDuty's setup cost reflects its integration features and comprehensive threat detection capabilities.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers ease of use with automated compliance and anomaly detection. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security excels in real-time threat response and workload protection. FortiCNAPP integrates seamlessly, while CrowdStrike provides comprehensive endpoint protection, making both appealing for diverse security needs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. FortiCNAPP Report
FortiCNAPP offers a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, making it a more budget-friendly option. Conversely, CrowdStrike Falcon provides a more robust setup that may justify its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, making it a more budget-friendly option. Conversely, CrowdStrike Falcon provides a more robust setup that may justify its higher initial investment.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Illumio
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Illumio
4.1 out of 5
Illumio offers application dependency mapping and micro-segmentation, excelling in policy enforcement. In comparison, FortiCNAPP stands out with continuous compliance and anomaly detection, favored for its security compliance integration. Illumio is cost-effective, while FortiCNAPP stabilizes pricing for flexibility.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Illumio Report
Illumio has no upfront setup cost, while FortiCNAPP requires a moderate initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Illumio has no upfront setup cost, while FortiCNAPP requires a moderate initial investment.
FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels with customizable alerts and deep insights, appealing to enterprises needing enhanced visibility. In comparison, AWS Security Hub integrates seamlessly with AWS-native services, providing a streamlined approach to security management and making it attractive for organizations heavily invested in AWS environments.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. FortiCNAPP Report
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost compared to AWS Security Hub, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment; however, AWS Security Hub offers a broader integration scope, potentially justifying its higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost compared to AWS Security Hub, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment; however, AWS Security Hub offers a broader integration scope, potentially justifying its higher setup expenses.
FortiCNAPP Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers robust data protection with automated threat intelligence, appealing to security-focused organizations. In comparison, JFrog Xray provides deep artifact scanning and DevOps integration, ideal for enterprises prioritizing software supply chain security. FortiCNAPP suits immediate implementation, while Xray ensures long-term integration benefits.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. JFrog Xray Report
FortiCNAPP offers a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice, while JFrog Xray has a comparatively higher setup expense, highlighting a notable difference in pricing approach between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice, while JFrog Xray has a comparatively higher setup expense, highlighting a notable difference in pricing approach between the two security solutions.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
4.1 out of 5
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation excels in micro-segmentation and advanced visibility across environments, offering strong operating system support. In comparison, FortiCNAPP emphasizes rich telemetry and deception for active defense, with challenges in integration and data visibility but provides valuable security insights.
Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. FortiCNAPP Report
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation features a higher setup cost compared to FortiCNAPP, highlighting the budget-friendly implementation of the latter for cost-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation features a higher setup cost compared to FortiCNAPP, highlighting the budget-friendly implementation of the latter for cost-conscious organizations.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center excels in vulnerability scanning and asset management. In comparison, FortiCNAPP integrates seamlessly across cloud infrastructures with advanced threat detection and compliance monitoring, making each suitable for different organizational needs depending on specific security focus and deployment preferences.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center requires a considerable initial setup cost, while FortiCNAPP offers a more affordable entry point. The price differences highlight the varying budgetary impacts of choosing either solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center requires a considerable initial setup cost, while FortiCNAPP offers a more affordable entry point. The price differences highlight the varying budgetary impacts of choosing either solution.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers robust vulnerability management and compliance monitoring. In comparison, Orca Security delivers agentless scanning with deep visibility. Tech buyers may choose FortiCNAPP for its compliance reporting needs or Orca for its comprehensive agentless security capabilities and SideScanning technology.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Orca Security Report
FortiCNAPP requires an initial setup cost, which is lower than Orca Security's setup expenses. Orca Security, however, offers more comprehensive initial package options compared to FortiCNAPP, which focuses on affordability in the initial phase.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP requires an initial setup cost, which is lower than Orca Security's setup expenses. Orca Security, however, offers more comprehensive initial package options compared to FortiCNAPP, which focuses on affordability in the initial phase.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers comprehensive monitoring and compliance features with machine learning detection and multi-cloud integration, making it ideal for enterprises seeking extensive security capabilities. In comparison, Trivy provides open-source cost-effectiveness with seamless CI/CD integration and critical vulnerability detection, catering to budget-conscious organizations.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy Report
FortiCNAPP requires a substantial setup cost, while Trivy offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP requires a substantial setup cost, while Trivy offers a more cost-effective setup option.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP excels in visibility and compliance, offering robust IAM controls. In comparison, FortiCNAPP stands out with customization and real-time analytics. CloudGuard is favored for hybrid cloud deployment; FortiCNAPP is noted for integration capabilities and ROI through resource management.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. FortiCNAPP Report
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has a moderate setup cost, while FortiCNAPP offers a more competitive initial pricing, highlighting FortiCNAPP's affordability advantage for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has a moderate setup cost, while FortiCNAPP offers a more competitive initial pricing, highlighting FortiCNAPP's affordability advantage for budget-conscious users.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Aqua Cloud Security Platform appeals with competitive pricing and robust support, fitting for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, FortiCNAPP offers advanced features and AI-driven analytics, ideal for enterprises seeking intelligent insights and willing to invest in comprehensive security solutions for increased long-term ROI.
Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. FortiCNAPP Report
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while FortiCNAPP typically involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while FortiCNAPP typically involves a higher initial investment.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP highlights machine learning for threat detection and efficient virtual patching, ideal for cloud-based security. In comparison, Trend Vision One - Cloud Security emphasizes multi-cloud protection with robust intrusion prevention, integrating seamlessly with popular platforms, offering business-friendly deployment flexibility.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
FortiCNAPP offers clear details on setup costs, making budgeting straightforward, while Trend Vision One requires a deeper assessment of initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in transparency between the two cloud security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers clear details on setup costs, making budgeting straightforward, while Trend Vision One requires a deeper assessment of initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in transparency between the two cloud security solutions.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels with anomaly detection, compliance reporting, and integration with Slack for alerts, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management focuses on comprehensive asset management and risk assessments. In comparison, Qualys offers integration with existing modules, which is beneficial for current Qualys users.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
FortiCNAPP offers lower setup costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, providing a more cost-effective initial deployment. However, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management delivers a comprehensive feature set that can justify the higher setup investment for some organizati...
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers lower setup costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, providing a more cost-effective initial deployment. However, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management delivers a comprehensive feature set that can justify the higher setup investment for some organizati...
FortiCNAPP Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
Sysdig Secure focuses on cloud-native environments with cost-effective pricing and easy deployment. In comparison, FortiCNAPP offers extensive feature sets with comprehensive security management, integrating deeply with existing infrastructures, appealing to those needing a robust security investment despite higher initial costs.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Secure Report
Sysdig Secure offers a more streamlined setup process compared to FortiCNAPP, which may have a higher initial setup complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Sysdig Secure offers a more streamlined setup process compared to FortiCNAPP, which may have a higher initial setup complexity.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP streamlines monitoring with comprehensive alerting and security features for multi-cloud environments. In comparison, Amazon Inspector integrates seamlessly with AWS, offering tailored, automated vulnerability scans for EC2 instances. Tech buyers may prefer FortiCNAPP for robust features or Amazon Inspector for cost-effective AWS integration.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. FortiCNAPP Report
FortiCNAPP has a lower initial setup cost compared to Amazon Inspector, making it a more budget-friendly option for businesses starting cybersecurity implementations. In contrast, Amazon Inspector involves higher setup expenses, reflecting its comprehensive security assessment features.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a lower initial setup cost compared to Amazon Inspector, making it a more budget-friendly option for businesses starting cybersecurity implementations. In contrast, Amazon Inspector involves higher setup expenses, reflecting its comprehensive security assessment features.
FortiCNAPP Logo
XM Cyber
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
XM Cyber
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels with integration capabilities and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those prioritizing seamless connectivity. In comparison, XM Cyber provides advanced attack simulation and risk analysis, ideal for security teams seeking detailed threat modeling and deep insight into vulnerabilities.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. XM Cyber Report
FortiCNAPP has a one-time setup cost while XM Cyber requires a monthly subscription. FortiCNAPP is ideal for those preferring an upfront payment, whereas XM Cyber's subscription is suitable for ongoing cost allocation.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a one-time setup cost while XM Cyber requires a monthly subscription. FortiCNAPP is ideal for those preferring an upfront payment, whereas XM Cyber's subscription is suitable for ongoing cost allocation.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Cloud Security
4.2 out of 5
FortiCNAPP is favored for cost-effective pricing and integration capabilities. In comparison, Tenable Cloud Security is considered for its advanced analytics and long-term ROI. FortiCNAPP suits budget-conscious buyers, while Tenable attracts those valuing features and superior real-time assistance.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable Cloud Security Report
FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup with minimal upfront costs, while Tenable Cloud Security demands a higher initial investment for configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup with minimal upfront costs, while Tenable Cloud Security demands a higher initial investment for configuration.
FortiCNAPP Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
FortiCNAPP stands out for its seamless compliance and effective anomaly detection, while SUSE NeuVector offers robust runtime security and network threat scanning. In comparison, SUSE NeuVector's affordability complements its image scanning features, and FortiCNAPP excels with proactive customer support and comprehensive machine learning capabilities.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector Report
FortiCNAPP is noted for its straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while SUSE NeuVector offers a more complex installation process that may entail higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP is noted for its straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while SUSE NeuVector offers a more complex installation process that may entail higher setup expenses.
FortiCNAPP Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere provides all-in-one functionality with strong network visibility for diverse environments. In comparison, FortiCNAPP excels in cloud security with automated policy recommendations. Buyers may consider USM Anywhere for its flexibility and FortiCNAPP for its cloud-centric capabilities.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere has moderate setup costs, whereas FortiCNAPP incurs a higher initial expense. This cost difference makes USM Anywhere a more accessible option for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere has moderate setup costs, whereas FortiCNAPP incurs a higher initial expense. This cost difference makes USM Anywhere a more accessible option for budget-conscious businesses.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security offers cost-effective integration into Kubernetes with strong support. In comparison, FortiCNAPP provides advanced threat detection and AI capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security, despite potentially higher costs. Each solution presents unique strengths for enhancing Kubernetes security.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Report
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes involves significant initial setup costs, while FortiCNAPP offers a relatively lower setup expense, highlighting a cost-effective option for those prioritizing budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes involves significant initial setup costs, while FortiCNAPP offers a relatively lower setup expense, highlighting a cost-effective option for those prioritizing budget considerations.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
4.1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in compliance reporting and anomaly detection, simplifying data management. In comparison, Azure Kubernetes Service offers robust scalability and automation with seamless integration into Azure's ecosystem, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Each solution provides distinct strengths in security and integration.
Download Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. FortiCNAPP Report
FortiCNAPP has a straightforward setup cost, offering flexibility, while Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) may involve more complex initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a straightforward setup cost, offering flexibility, while Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) may involve more complex initial expenses.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Morphisec excels in endpoint protection through deterministic attack and in-memory prevention, integrating smoothly with Microsoft Defender. In comparison, FortiCNAPP specializes in cloud security with anomaly detection, though it lacks Morphisec's focus on endpoints, emphasizing cloud compliance and management instead.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Morphisec Report
Morphisec offers a more cost-effective setup without compromising performance, while FortiCNAPP involves a higher initial investment, indicating a focus on additional advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Morphisec offers a more cost-effective setup without compromising performance, while FortiCNAPP involves a higher initial investment, indicating a focus on additional advanced features.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz Code
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz Code
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in ease of deployment and offers budget-friendly pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Wiz Code provides advanced automation and integration, making it attractive for those needing a comprehensive feature set despite a more complex setup.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Wiz Code Report
FortiCNAPP offers a competitive setup cost, while Wiz Code presents a higher expense, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers a competitive setup cost, while Wiz Code presents a higher expense, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.3 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in security management with machine learning-based threat detection and integration with tools like Slack. In comparison, Qualys TotalCloud focuses on comprehensive vulnerability management and Kubernetes security. Buyers appreciate FortiCNAPP's customer service while valuing Qualys's hybrid cloud advantage and detailed reporting.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys TotalCloud Report
FortiCNAPP has a straightforward setup cost, while Qualys TotalCloud offers a more flexible pricing structure, allowing tailored solutions for different needs.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a straightforward setup cost, while Qualys TotalCloud offers a more flexible pricing structure, allowing tailored solutions for different needs.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
FortiCNAPP attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective pricing, accessible customer service, and robust security capabilities. In comparison, Upwind appeals through advanced features such as real-time analytics and adaptive threat responses, justifying higher costs with greater deployment flexibility and long-term value.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Upwind Report
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost compared to Upwind, highlighting its budget-friendly approach, while Upwind offers a more premium setup option that may be appealing for those seeking comprehensive upfront support and features.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a lower setup cost compared to Upwind, highlighting its budget-friendly approach, while Upwind offers a more premium setup option that may be appealing for those seeking comprehensive upfront support and features.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Aikido Security
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Aikido Security
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in affordability and ease of deployment, attracting budget-conscious buyers seeking rapid implementation. In comparison, Aikido Security delivers advanced automation and dynamic features, appealing to enterprises wanting robust security and willing to invest in a comprehensive, custom-tailored solution for long-term value.
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, providing advanced features tailored to large enterprises, while Aikido Security offers a more affordable setup, appealing to small and medium businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, providing advanced features tailored to large enterprises, while Aikido Security offers a more affordable setup, appealing to small and medium businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its affordability and strong customer support. In comparison, Cortex Cloud attracts those prioritizing innovation with advanced analytics and automation for proactive threat mitigation, making it ideal for sophisticated security environments despite its higher cost.
Download Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. FortiCNAPP Report
FortiCNAPP features a straightforward setup with a competitive cost, while Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a more complex setup with higher initial costs, highlighting significant differences in initial investment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP features a straightforward setup with a competitive cost, while Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a more complex setup with higher initial costs, highlighting significant differences in initial investment needs.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec
3.9 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers robust anomaly detection and integration ease for environments requiring compliance insights. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightCloudSec provides comprehensive workload protection with centralized vulnerability management. FortiCNAPP's policy adjustments cater to complex rule configurations, whereas InsightCloudSec excels in threat intelligence and speedy vulnerability remediation.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Rapid7 InsightCloudSec Report
FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process at a lower cost, while Rapid7 InsightCloudSec requires a more complex and expensive initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process at a lower cost, while Rapid7 InsightCloudSec requires a more complex and expensive initial configuration.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Google Cloud Security Command Center
3.8 out of 5
Tech buyers might choose FortiCNAPP for its robust network security and attractive pricing. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center appeals with its extensive feature set and seamless integration within Google Cloud, offering strong ROI despite a higher cost.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Google Cloud Security Command Center Report
FortiCNAPP requires a lower initial setup investment compared to Google Cloud Security Command Center, which offers more comprehensive integration features, impacting setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP requires a lower initial setup investment compared to Google Cloud Security Command Center, which offers more comprehensive integration features, impacting setup cost.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in threat protection and seamless integration with existing systems. In comparison, Uptycs showcases strengths in cloud monitoring and security analytics, offering lower setup costs and faster ROI. FortiCNAPP suits those seeking long-term security value, while Uptycs attracts budget-conscious buyers.
FortiCNAPP offers a more cost-effective setup, while Uptycs requires higher initial deployment expenses. FortiCNAPP is known for quick integrations, whereas Uptycs prioritizes extensive customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers a more cost-effective setup, while Uptycs requires higher initial deployment expenses. FortiCNAPP is known for quick integrations, whereas Uptycs prioritizes extensive customization options.
FortiCNAPP Logo
DefectDojo
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
DefectDojo
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in pricing, support, and integration, making it ideal for cost-sensitive security needs. In comparison, DefectDojo's comprehensive features and security testing capabilities appeal to those prioritizing functionality and detailed management in complex environments despite its higher cost.
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost compared to DefectDojo, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost compared to DefectDojo, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security
4.0 out of 5
BMC Helix Cloud Security offers robust configuration management and automated policy enforcement for consistent compliance. In comparison, FortiCNAPP focuses on integration and security controls, delivering extensive threat protection. BMC is ideal for quick implementation, while FortiCNAPP suits those seeking comprehensive security features.
Download BMC Helix Cloud Security vs. FortiCNAPP Report
BMC Helix Cloud Security offers a straightforward setup cost, while FortiCNAPP presents a more complex pricing structure. BMC Helix is ideal for those seeking simplicity in billing, whereas FortiCNAPP suits users prioritizing detailed cost breakdowns.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Helix Cloud Security offers a straightforward setup cost, while FortiCNAPP presents a more complex pricing structure. BMC Helix is ideal for those seeking simplicity in billing, whereas FortiCNAPP suits users prioritizing detailed cost breakdowns.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Runecast
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Runecast
4.5 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in advanced threat detection with seamless deployment and hands-on support, appealing to those needing quick integration. In comparison, Runecast's standout features in predictive analysis and compliance management attract buyers prioritizing long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.
FortiCNAPP offers lower setup costs, while Runecast provides detailed pricing with a higher initial investment. FortiCNAPP is more cost-effective upfront, whereas Runecast may offer more comprehensive features at the expense of higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers lower setup costs, while Runecast provides detailed pricing with a higher initial investment. FortiCNAPP is more cost-effective upfront, whereas Runecast may offer more comprehensive features at the expense of higher initial costs.
FortiCNAPP Logo
AccuKnox Platform
3.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
AccuKnox Platform
3.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP impresses with network security and intuitive management tools, providing a seamless deployment experience and superior support. In comparison, AccuKnox offers advanced analytics and a Zero Trust framework, requiring more customization but delivering extensive enterprise support and a high long-term ROI.
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, while AccuKnox Platform offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, while AccuKnox Platform offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Bridgecrew
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Bridgecrew
4.0 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in advanced threat protection and scalability suited for larger enterprises. In comparison, Bridgecrew offers strong integrations and compliance management, appealing to cloud-native environments. FortiCNAPP provides cost-effective traditional security, while Bridgecrew delivers enhanced ROI via automation.
Download Bridgecrew vs. FortiCNAPP Report
FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Bridgecrew provides a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Bridgecrew provides a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup process.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
VMware Carbon Black Workload
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP attracts tech buyers due to its cost-effectiveness and easy deployment. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Workload appeals with its advanced analytics and scalability. Buyers choose FortiCNAPP for affordability, while VMware is selected for superior protection through machine learning.
FortiCNAPP's setup cost is competitive with straightforward deployment, whereas VMware Carbon Black Workload requires higher initial investments with a complex setup.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP's setup cost is competitive with straightforward deployment, whereas VMware Carbon Black Workload requires higher initial investments with a complex setup.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Plerion
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Plerion
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP impresses with comprehensive security and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Plerion excels in integration and personalized support. FortiCNAPP suits those prioritizing efficient threat prevention, while Plerion appeals to those valuing seamless integration and specialized assistance, each offering unique benefits to discerning tech buyers.
FortiCNAPP incurs higher setup costs, while Plerion offers a more budget-friendly option with lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP incurs higher setup costs, while Plerion offers a more budget-friendly option with lower initial expenses.
FortiCNAPP Logo
FortiCNAPP Logo
Netskope Public Cloud Security
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers cost-effectiveness with streamlined detection and robust support. In comparison, Netskope Public Cloud Security distinguishes itself with advanced features and scalability for complex needs, making it suitable for businesses prioritizing comprehensive security solutions despite a higher initial investment.
FortiCNAPP requires a higher initial setup cost, while Netskope Public Cloud Security offers a more budget-friendly setup. Differences in initial expenses highlight distinct pricing approaches between FortiCNAPP and Netskope Public Cloud Security.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP requires a higher initial setup cost, while Netskope Public Cloud Security offers a more budget-friendly setup. Differences in initial expenses highlight distinct pricing approaches between FortiCNAPP and Netskope Public Cloud Security.
FortiCNAPP Logo
Lightspin
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP Logo
Lightspin
1 out of 5
FortiCNAPP offers comprehensive security integration, appealing to enterprises needing a robust ecosystem. In comparison, Lightspin's advanced analytics and efficient threat prioritization attract organizations prioritizing agility and resource optimization, making it suitable for tighter budgets and dynamic operational needs.
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, whereas Lightspin offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, whereas Lightspin offers a more budget-friendly option.

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Container Security
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)