

Veracode and FortiCNAPP compete in the application security segment. Veracode appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive application security features, although FortiCNAPP provides strong cloud-native protection.
Features: Veracode offers static, dynamic, and manual scanning capabilities, making it ideal for DevOps integration. It supports multiple languages and integrates seamlessly with various developer environments. FortiCNAPP emphasizes cloud-native application protection with continuous compliance and security monitoring, aimed at reducing vulnerability exposure.
Room for Improvement: Veracode faces challenges with false positives and an outdated user interface. Users desire enhanced dynamic sandbox scanning, improved API integration, and more language support. FortiCNAPP users suggest better integrations, streamlined access to vulnerabilities, and improved scalability, especially regarding vulnerability organization and CI/CD pipeline integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both platforms support deployment in public and private clouds, with Veracode also offering on-premises options. Veracode's technical support is competent and responsive, although setup might require frequent interactions. FortiCNAPP provides a flexible environment with less complex initial setup and valuable support for deployment and ongoing assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Veracode is considered expensive, though justified by its robust security features and reduction in AppSec costs, but may not suit smaller enterprises. FortiCNAPP offers a more flexible licensing model with fewer variable costs, potentially better accommodating organizations seeking straightforward cost planning. Both solutions are seen as costly but worthwhile investments for larger organizations with a need for strong security solutions.
The scanners of Veracode bring status of the weaknesses in the current infrastructure. It scans and provides reports regarding the servers, the network, and the applications running on those servers.
Regarding price, the evaluation should focus on how efficiently they will recover their investment, considering the time saved through the use of Veracode Fix, for example, and the ability to fix code at dev time compared to the problems faced when fixing after the product is already deployed.
We did see a return on investment with Veracode, as we segregated our remediation efforts, which reduced our time to delivery as well as the number of engineers needed to help us in delivering a secure solution.
Technical support from Fortinet is good; I get feedback and responses quickly.
Access to the engineering team is crucial for faster feedback on the product fix process.
I have communicated with the technical support of Veracode a couple of times, and this was a really great experience because these professionals know their material.
They share detailed information via email, including screenshots or further clarification about the issue.
Cloud solutions are easier to scale than on-premise solutions.
It has a good capacity to scale effectively.
Implementing these features into our normal CI/CD was good, so I can say that scalability is really good.
If the Veracode server is down, we experience many issues during the scan.
It's not that easy to onboard, but once they have been onboarded on the platform, and the pipeline configured alongside the product configured, it works effectively.
The vulnerability part is not systematically organized; it is all clumsy in the web UI, and it is not user-friendly.
If it could be integrated directly with code repositories such as Bitbucket or GitHub, without the need to create a pipeline to upload and decode code, it would simplify the code scan process significantly.
We had issues with scanning large applications. Scanning took a lot of time, so we kept it outside the DevOps pipeline to avoid delaying deployments.
A nice addition would be if it could be extended for scenarios with custom cleansers.
It's not the most expensive solution.
Overall, Veracode's pricing is lower and more scalable than many alternatives in the market.
If there's a security gap, you'll never know the cost or effect.
The machine learning capability in Lacework FortiCNAPP is used for threat detection.
It offers confidence by preventing exposure to vulnerabilities and helps ensure that we are not deploying vulnerable code into production.
The best features in Veracode include static analysis and the early detection of vulnerable libraries; it integrates with tools such as Jenkins.
It fixes issues directly in the IDE while you're doing it.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Veracode | 3.2% |
| FortiCNAPP | 2.0% |
| Other | 94.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 44 |
| Large Enterprise | 113 |
FortiCNAPP is a comprehensive cloud security platform focusing on ease of use and machine learning-driven anomaly detection. It offers robust compliance reporting, seamless integration, and continuous monitoring, making it an essential tool for organizations managing multi-cloud environments and security configurations.
FortiCNAPP provides significant capabilities in cloud security, compliance, and vulnerability management. Designed for organizations needing efficient monitoring, it enables detection of anomalies across cloud infrastructures while optimizing security posture and ensuring compliance with environments like AWS and GCP. The platform offers in-depth insights through scanning of IAC scripts, host systems, and cloud configurations. Recognized for effectively managing security posture, it safeguards Kubernetes and container environments, providing comprehensive threat detection and response. However, some areas like visibility, IAM security controls, and compliance metrics need improvement. Users face challenges with alert setup and lack intuitive design, alongside issues like FedRAMP authorization absence and complexity in the data model.
What are the key features of FortiCNAPP?FortiCNAPP is implemented extensively by industries needing reliable cloud security, such as finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. It supports organizations in enhancing cloud infrastructure protection, ensuring compliance, and strengthening vulnerability management. By integrating with platforms like AWS and GCP, businesses can optimize security posture in their cloud deployments.
Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.
Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.
What are the key features of Veracode?
What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?
Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.
Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.