OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Sumo Logic Observability comparison

OpenText and Sumo Logic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #47 with an average rating of 7.7, while Sumo Logic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Sumo Logic’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 58% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sumo Logic users who would recommend it.

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews

447 Views
247 Comparison Views

58% willing to recommend

Sumo Logic Observability

Read 6 Sumo Logic Observability reviews

441 Views
226 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Sumo Logic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and Sumo Logic Observability are two competitive products in the realm of performance monitoring and observability for tech buyers. User reviews indicate that Sumo Logic Observability generally has the upper hand due to its more comprehensive features and overall user experience.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to Sumo Logic Observability?

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers real-time monitoring, root cause analysis, and valuable insights into user experiences. Sumo Logic Observability features advanced analytics, comprehensive dashboards, and integration capabilities, providing a broader range of functionalities that many users find superior.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to Sumo Logic Observability?

OpenText Real User Monitoring needs better customization options and more flexible reporting. Sumo Logic Observability users have highlighted its complexity, indicating a need for enhanced usability and more intuitive navigation experiences.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to Sumo Logic Observability?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Sumo Logic Observability, although slightly more complex to deploy due to its advanced feature set, offers robust support and comprehensive documentation that users find highly effective.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to Sumo Logic Observability?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is known for its competitive pricing and efficiency in maximizing ROI due to lower setup costs. Sumo Logic Observability, though more expensive, is perceived as providing a solid ROI due to its extensive features and depth of insights.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Sumo Logic Observability Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Sumo Logic Observability

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

47th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sumo Logic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (17th), AIOps (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sumo Logic Observability is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive

Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.

Read full review

Shamshir Nangla

Site Reliability Engineer at LHV Bank

Getting up and running is easy, even for a newbie but management of searches definitely needs improvement

Operational effectiveness with regards to when there's an issue, when there's a reactive issue, people are able to, or as well as proactively, actually, because we use their PagerDuty integrations. We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening. With those same alerts, obviously, with that platform, you can use it to reactively start looking at troubleshooting issues as they're happening right then and there or incidents. So it's been very, very good for alerting and for troubleshooting issues. For predicting issues before they happen, it is not very good. They have a feature called anomaly detection, but I think it's quite premature compared to other stuff out there. So it's good for alerts and for troubleshooting operational effectiveness. When your operations are down or segregated, it's perfect because it will help you diagnose the issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

"Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold."

"It is a good product."

"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."

"The technical support is good at resolving issues."

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

"The solution allows multiple groups to converge on a unified platform, allowing for different utilization by various teams."

"Sumo Logic Observability presents a range of valuable features, including well-crafted dashboards and a diverse selection of helpful apps. However, personally, I don't hold a favorable opinion of the solution. While I don't struggle with writing queries, my main difficulty lies in recruiting competent individuals and ensuring their proficiency in utilizing the solution. This often leads to additional challenges and complexities. From my perspective, when compared to Microsoft Sentinel or even Splunk, Sumo Logic Observability has a steeper learning curve. One contributing factor to this disparity is the solution's long existence in the market compared to Synlogic. Nevertheless, I acknowledge that there are capable and knowledgeable professionals employed at Sumo Logic Observability. The effectiveness of the solution largely depends on how it is integrated into your internal operations and environment. Its utility and benefits can vary significantly. It is worth noting that organizations like the NSA and, I believe, the CIA used it in the past, primarily for rapidly searching and analyzing large volumes of data. To leverage its capabilities effectively, you must determine how to tailor it to your specific needs."

"We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening."

"Alerting and consistency are key. We have different tiers with log collectors, and continuous querying provides near-real-time updates. It's almost like instantly when something happens, like pending transactions or error fees. This helps reduce incident resolution time compared to waiting for thresholds on other platforms. We can continue logging in with them seamlessly and quickly get into action."

"The product is easy to learn."

"I have not seen any stability issues in the product."

Cons

"The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays."

"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

"This technology is considered to be older."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

"Documentation could be better. While it's generally good, sometimes finding what you need requires extensive searching. It's not always clear where to look for specific things."

"Implementing a more streamlined enrichment process, and conceptualizing the observability data collection as an ETL pipeline would be helpful."

"SearchUI.exe is a bit clunky in the product, making it an area where the product needs improvements."

"Fine-grained data can be quite frustrating to work with and should be made easier."

"The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five minutes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"Not expensive."

"I started on the free tier to try it out, but because of our usage, we're now paying for it."

"Now, they’re not charging by ingests anymore. You should expect the price to be a bit of an unknown and to basically increase as the business increases."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Government

Real Estate/Law Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sumo Logic Observability?

The product is easy to learn.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sumo Logic Observability?

The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sumo Logic Observability?

We used it for log observability – log aggregation specifically.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 30% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 30% of the time

New Relic vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

Cribl vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 12% of the time

More Sumo Logic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring

May 2025

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

Sumo Logic Observability

May 2025

Download Sumo Logic Observability product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

No data available

Overview

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

OpenText

Sumo Logic Observability is widely used for log aggregation, analysis, and SIEM capabilities. It assists in monitoring data, creating dashboards, and managing log storage.

Sumo Logic Observability helps teams with logging in production, debugging with trace IDs, and performing queries across large datasets. Developers leverage centralized logs for error detection and tracking metrics like successful transactions and data volume. Security teams integrate it with SOAR systems for automation and enhanced security investigations.

What are the key features?

Well-crafted dashboards: Provides visually appealing and easy-to-use dashboards.
Diverse apps: Supports multiple applications for various use cases.
Centralized management: Enables streamlined log management from a unified platform.
Near-real-time alerting: Facilitates quick incident resolution with timely notifications.
Continuous querying: Allows for constant data analysis without interruptions.
Proprietary query language: Offers a robust and flexible language for complex queries.
Custom field creation: Simplifies addition of custom fields for better data categorization.
Robust data tracing: Ensures effective log tracing for efficient debugging and analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved error detection: Helps quickly identify and address errors in production.
Enhanced security: Integrates with SOAR for better security automation and investigation.
Efficient log management: Centralizes log storage and management, simplifying processes.
Timely incident resolution: Near-real-time alerts and continuous queries lead to faster issue resolution.
Customizable to user needs: Offers flexibility with custom fields and a proprietary query language.

Industries like finance, healthcare, and technology implement Sumo Logic Observability to monitor sensitive data, manage high transaction volumes, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Security and development teams benefit from its robust capabilities, enabling effective collaboration and streamlined operations.

Sumo Logic

Sample Customers

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Sumo Logic Observability

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Sumo Logic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Sumo Logic Observability and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Sumo Logic Observability report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.