

ProcessMaker and OpenText Process Automation are competitors in process automation solutions. OpenText Process Automation may have the upper hand due to its robust features catering to larger organizations, whereas ProcessMaker's cost-effectiveness and flexibility are appealing for varied organizational sizes.
Features: ProcessMaker provides an intuitive drag-and-drop process modeler, easy integration capabilities, and strong customization options. OpenText Process Automation offers advanced data management, scalability, and a suite of enterprise-grade automation tools designed for comprehensive enterprise use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ProcessMaker offers rapid deployment with both cloud-based and on-premises solutions, supported by responsive customer service. OpenText Process Automation involves a complex deployment approach suitable for enterprises, backed by extensive support channels for larger-scale deployments.
Pricing and ROI: ProcessMaker is known for lower initial setup costs, providing good ROI for small to mid-sized businesses with affordable licensing. OpenText Process Automation requires a higher initial investment but offers substantial ROI for enterprises with its comprehensive features and functionalities.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Process Automation | 1.1% |
| ProcessMaker | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.
OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.
What are the key features?OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.
ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.