OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs WebRatio comparison

OpenText and WebRatio are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.3, while WebRatio is ranked #55. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to WebRatio’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of WebRatio users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 16 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

577 Views
531 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WebRatio

Read 2 WebRatio reviews

203 Views
201 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

WebRatio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and WebRatio compete in enterprise solutions. OpenText 360 for SharePoint has the upper hand in pricing and support, whereas WebRatio is superior in its feature set and perceived value.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers seamless SharePoint integration, strong compliance management, and enhanced search functionality. WebRatio provides powerful visual development tools, rapid application development capabilities, and flexibility in customizing applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates smoothly with SharePoint and is known for responsive customer service. WebRatio allows efficient deployment with adaptable cloud solutions, though its customer service may be less responsive.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint has a higher upfront cost with significant ROI via improved SharePoint efficiencies. WebRatio has a lower initial cost, flexible pricing plans, and delivers attractive ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WebRatio Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WebRatio

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WebRatio

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

55th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WebRatio is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	0.5%
WebRatio	0.3%
Other	99.2%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Krishnan S

Head - Financial Reporting and Taxation at TVS Capital Funds

Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive

OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Read full review

reviewer1485573

IT Services Consultant at a consultancy with self employed

Little coding needed and speeds development time but lacks documentation

The maintenance aspect is too heavy. Moving from one version to the other made the solution change, and not in a way that we liked. Typically there are documents about the release of new versions and a set of activities required to migrate from one to the other. This time, it was very messy. There were issues surrounding the management of the release. This could potentially be due to the fact that WebRation, in the past, had started to make some choices regarding the framework and architecture that were changed later. In the past, we'd use a strategy as the environment, as an architectural pattern for the application. Now, it's moving more on the spring framework and this initiated some change that obviously had an impact on our application. It's caused a problem with maintenance. The solution seems to have changed its approach. Now, it's more related to a federative application environment in a monolithic aspect. While the solution was interesting at one point, everything is moving towards the cloud. WebRatio should be moving also in the web approach. Currently, you have to install an environment inside the desktop. The future is the cloud. Normally with a low code environment, there is a VPN notation - maybe a WebML or FML notation. If they can move in to have an environment that has a running machine at the end, it would be great. Obviously, some components on the server-side should be deliberate. Normally it's the model you control that's step-by-step and has a very simple flow. In the digital environment, in the organization, the process is more complex. The quality of the documentation and the community surrounding the product are poor. They need to give users more documentation and build up the surrounding community. As it isn't a well-known product, it's hard to find professionals to work with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"The initial setup isn't too complex."

Cons

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a reasonable price."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"On-premises version is expensive"

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Bonita vs WebRatio

Compared 100% of the time

More WebRatio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

August 2025

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2025

Download WebRatio product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

No data available

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

In WebRatio we have been nurturing a true passion for developing enterprise-class software that exponentially increases the productivity and agility of our customers.

WebRatio

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Unicredit Leasing, Acer, Gruppo Torinese Transporti, A2A, SET Distribuzone, Dolomiti Energia, AIM Gruppo, IFC CNA_ Amsa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WebRatio

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WebRatio

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WebRatio and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WebRatio report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.